Page 1 of 3

Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:44 pm
by Skjellyfetti
The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters look like Republicans in many ways, but they hold more conservative views on a range of issues and tend to be older than Republicans generally. They are also more likely than Republicans as a whole to describe themselves as “very conservative” and President Obama as “very liberal.”

And while most Republicans say they are “dissatisfied” with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as “angry.”
In some ways, Tea Party supporters look like the general public. For instance, despite their allusions to Revolutionary War-era tax protesters, most describe the amount they paid in taxes this year as “fair.” Most send their children to public schools, do not think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president, and, despite their push for smaller government, think that Social Security and Medicare are worth the cost. They are actually more likely than the general public to have returned their census forms, despite some conservative leaders urging a boycott.
The overwhelming majority of Tea Party supporters say Mr. Obama does not share the values most Americans live by, and that he does not understand the problems of people like themselves. More than half say the policies of the administration favor the poor, and 25 percent, compared with 11 percent of the general public, think that the administration favors blacks over whites. They are more likely than the general public, and Republicans, to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black people.
“I just feel he’s getting away from what America is,” said Kathy Mayhugh, 67, a retired medical transcriber in Jacksonville. “He’s a socialist. And to tell you the truth I think he’s a Muslim and trying to head us in that direction, I don’t care what he says. He’s been in office over a year and can’t find a church to go to. That doesn’t say much for him.”

The nationwide telephone poll was conducted April 5-12 with 1,580 adults. For the purposes of analysis, Tea Party supporters were oversampled, for a total of 881, and then weighted back to their proper proportion in the poll. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points for both all adults and Tea Party supporters.
They do not want a third party, and say they usually or almost always vote Republican. The percentage holding a favorable opinion of former president George W. Bush — at 57 percent — almost exactly matches the percentage in the general public that holds an unfavorable view.
And nearly three quarters said they would prefer smaller government even if it means spending on domestic programs would be cut.

But in follow up interviews, people said did not want to cut Medicare or Social Security — the biggest domestic programs – suggesting instead a focus on “waste.”

“I do believe we are responsible for the widow and the orphan,” said Richard Gilbert, a 72 year old retired teacher. “But I think there is a welfare class that lives for having children and receiving payment from the government for having those children. They have no incentive to do any better because they have been conditioned into it.”


Others defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying they had paid into the system, so deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

“I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security,” said Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. “I didn’t look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I’ve changed my mind.”
( :lol: )
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/po ... ll.html?hp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:50 pm
by Wedgebuster
Image

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:15 am
by OSBF
Skjellyfetti wrote:
But in follow up interviews, people said did not want to cut Medicare or Social Security — the biggest domestic programs – suggesting instead a focus on “waste.”

“I do believe we are responsible for the widow and the orphan,” said Richard Gilbert, a 72 year old retired teacher. “But I think there is a welfare class that lives for having children and receiving payment from the government for having those children. They have no incentive to do any better because they have been conditioned into it.”


Others defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying they had paid into the system, so deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

“I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security,” said Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. “I didn’t look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I’ve changed my mind.”
( :lol: )

so in summary, they want their government handouts, but want to bitch and moan about other people getting a government handout.

ok, yeah.................

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:24 am
by Skjellyfetti
And when asked about it at a Tea Party rally realize their position makes no sense and change their mind. :lol:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:55 am
by Benne
Skjellyfetti wrote:
“And to tell you the truth I think he’s a Muslim.”
Fucking really? Still?

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:02 am
by kalm
Benne wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
**** really? Still?
What's worse is that he's a blacksocialistmarxiststalinistcommunistcorporatistmuslim. :nod:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:34 am
by JMU DJ
Benne wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
Fucking really? Still?

I don't care so much that people think he's a Muslim, so what? I'm more disturbed by the second comment from the same lady:
"He’s been in office over a year and can’t find a church to go to. That doesn’t say much for him."
I was unaware we'd decided as the American people that our leaders be Christian and attend church. :roll:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:39 am
by Skjellyfetti
Keep goverment out of my Medicare!!!!!

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:45 am
by 89Hen
Why are teabaggers such an interest of Liberals? AFAIK there aren't any teabaggers here.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:46 am
by Benne
89Hen wrote:Why are teabaggers such an interest of Liberals? AFAIK there aren't any teabaggers here.
Paranoia is contagious. That's the only thing that I can see.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:47 am
by clenz
JMU DJ wrote:
I was unaware we'd decided as the American people that our leaders be Christian and attend church. :roll:
Think about it, when was the last time a non-Christian was president? Hell, only once in history has a non-protestant been President

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:49 am
by JMU DJ
89Hen wrote:Why are teabaggers such an interest of Liberals? AFAIK there aren't any teabaggers here.

... and the liberal agenda isn't a focus of the Tea Party?

... Conservatives don't have hang ups with Liberals and visa versa?

... your shit don't stank too?

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:51 am
by JMU DJ
clenz wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:
I was unaware we'd decided as the American people that our leaders be Christian and attend church. :roll:
Think about it, when was the last time a non-Christian was president? Hell, only once in history has a non-protestant been President
Yes Chester, I'm aware of the history. But can you tell me where it says we deemed it appropriate that only Christians become president and that they must attend church in order to be a good leader?

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:51 am
by AZGrizFan
Benne wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
Fucking really? Still?
Tell you what, we'll make you a deal: You dumbshits stop claiming that GW "stole" the election in 2000 and we'll stop calling Obama an African-born Muslim. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:56 am
by Benne
AZGrizFan wrote:
Benne wrote:
**** really? Still?
Tell you what, we'll make you a deal: You dumbshits stop claiming that GW "stole" the election in 2000 and we'll stop calling Obama an African-born Muslim. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Are you making deals with liberals? Fucking RINO :D

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:57 am
by 89Hen
JMU DJ wrote:tell me where it says we deemed it appropriate that only Christians become president and that they must attend church in order to be a good leader?
It doesn't. It just makes them more electible.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:59 am
by AZGrizFan
Benne wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Tell you what, we'll make you a deal: You dumbshits stop claiming that GW "stole" the election in 2000 and we'll stop calling Obama an African-born Muslim. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Are you making deals with liberals? Fucking RINO :D
If that's what it takes to get beyond that topic, yes.

And I'm a bridge-builder. Always have been. Just ask KY. :kisswink: :kisswink:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:59 am
by mainejeff
Angry, conservative white Baby Boomers........*YAWN*.

:coffee:

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:02 am
by clenz
89Hen wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:tell me where it says we deemed it appropriate that only Christians become president and that they must attend church in order to be a good leader?
It doesn't. It just makes them more electible.
This. American's (not just Conks, teabaggers, etc... aren't alone in this, it is an American issue) don't want/haven't wanted a non Christian president. Hell when JFK was elected wasn't there a bunch of "Catholic fear" that he was going to turn the country catholic?

The more mainstream, down the center in all areas, a person is the more electable they are.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:11 am
by GannonFan
mainejeff wrote:Angry, conservative white Baby Boomers........*YAWN*.

:coffee:
While I share your disdain of Baby Boomers, the other description you left out was ... Voters. People can dismiss the Tea Party all they want, and certainly the whacko fringe element that gets the most press is certainly worthy of being dismissed, but at the end of the day, there are a lot of people who will be going to the polls in November that share a lot of the views being put forth by those who identify with the Tea Parties. If incumbents just want to bet on the Tea Party being a fringe group, they stand to be disappointed in November when perfectly normal voters show up sharing some of the Tea Party views and voting accordingly.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:18 am
by death dealer
OSBF wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
But in follow up interviews, people said did not want to cut Medicare or Social Security — the biggest domestic programs – suggesting instead a focus on “waste.”

“I do believe we are responsible for the widow and the orphan,” said Richard Gilbert, a 72 year old retired teacher. “But I think there is a welfare class that lives for having children and receiving payment from the government for having those children. They have no incentive to do any better because they have been conditioned into it.”


Others defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying they had paid into the system, so deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

“I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security,” said Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. “I didn’t look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I’ve changed my mind.”
( :lol: )

so in summary, they want their government handouts, but want to bitch and moan about other people getting a government handout.

ok, yeah.................
But Social Security and medicare are not handouts. You pay into the system, and in all but rare exceptions, if you retire at 65 unless you live to a very old age, never get as much out as you pay in.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:37 am
by OL FU
Thanks God for the Tea Party. It isn't like they are rioting in the street. Just like thank God for the peaceful war protesters in the 60s and later. Thank god for people that take there time out to make their views known (even if their views might be occasionally convoluted). This and other groups are what make our democracy stronger. Don't diss dissent just because it doesn't fit your political view point.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:06 pm
by Ibanez
89Hen wrote:Why are teabaggers such an interest of Liberals? AFAIK there aren't any teabaggers here.
It'd be the same way if the Tea Baggers were predominately liberal.

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:12 pm
by native
OSBF wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
But in follow up interviews, people said did not want to cut Medicare or Social Security — the biggest domestic programs – suggesting instead a focus on “waste.”

“I do believe we are responsible for the widow and the orphan,” said Richard Gilbert, a 72 year old retired teacher. “But I think there is a welfare class that lives for having children and receiving payment from the government for having those children. They have no incentive to do any better because they have been conditioned into it.”


Others defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying they had paid into the system, so deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

“I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security,” said Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. “I didn’t look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I’ve changed my mind.”
( :lol: )

so in summary, they want their government handouts, but want to bitch and moan about other people getting a government handout.

ok, yeah.................
The time for honoring yourself will soon be at and end, peewee. 8-)

Re: Teabagger demographics:

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:14 pm
by Skjellyfetti
89Hen wrote:Why are teabaggers such an interest of Liberals? AFAIK there aren't any teabaggers here.
native is a teabagger. I'm sure there are some others that are afraid to admit it.

And, like them or not they are a new political movement that is worth following if you have an interest in politics.