Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Political discussions
blueballs
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2590
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
A.K.A.: blueballs
Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk

Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by blueballs »

Here's an example of what every American should be pissed about:

JOE LEGAL vs. JOSE ILLEGAL

You have two families: "Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have two parents, two children, and live in Arizona .

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".

Ready? Now pay attention...

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.

Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.

Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.

Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for homeowner/car/life insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinking insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.

Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after
work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch.. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens... You are part of the problem!
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by clenz »

Image


I don't know about all the numbers of the thread, but the gist of the post and the last sentence...bravo
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

EXACTLY!!!

This is why I have been saying tax the poor and make them accountable and pay their fair share. Very, very few people should ride for free.
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

So no whites are here illegally? :coffee:


1) Arizona is a non-union state. Joe was making $15/hour with little or no benefits, and would be eligible for anything that Jose is making. And there are no free medical/dental clinics in Arizona
2) Arizona has strict workforce rules (and enforcement). Even if Jose had forged papers, more likely than not he is paying social security taxes, income taxes, etc. He has auto insurance as well.
3) If Jose had no papers, he would not receive federal housing subsidies
4) If Jose had no papers, he would not receive food stamps

Joe construction worker in Arizona's kids would qualify for free lunches as well, because he is not making $25/hour.


CHAIN E-MAIL FAIL
:thumb:
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by JMU DJ »

Not to break balls here


... but Illegals can't obtain welfare or food stamps. Only through false documentation can they.

... Illegals pay sales tax, and contrary to the chain email provided, most pay into social security (which they will never get back unless they become citizens and then pay in for another 10 years minimum) and also pay income tax.

... US born children of illegals, who are documented and are citizens, can obtain medicaid and state children health insurance, not the Illegal parents. So this would go to your "anchor" baby, is a child born in the US really a US citizen argument.

... Assistance obtained for families containing US citizens with an Illegal head of household is less than 1%, compared to the 5% "native" average.

... the cost to enforce immigrations laws and deport illegals is estimated to cost more per year than the entire annual budget of the DHS.


... it's the emergency medical care and cost of public education where most of the money is lost.


... GAO estimates that over $1.3 billion is lost in fraudulent claims for unemployment. Only $30 million is estimated to be paid to Illegal aliens, or %2 of the fraudulent claims and less than 0.001% of total claims.


I have no problem trying to rectify these issues, enforcing/reforming/being stricter with illegal immigration, welfare reform, tighter regulation of unemployment, etc. Most of the monetary problems we have with the system come from "Natives" abusing the system, not illegals. I'm more worried about the number of citizens (and I currently know some of these people), who are knowingly abusing the system and have no problem with it.
Image
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

White illegals are a very small fraction (under 400k) of the 20 million illegals already in this country and of the 10k that come into our country everyday.


But then again you already knew that.
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

JMU DJ wrote:Not to break balls here


... but Illegals can't obtain welfare or food stamps. Only through false documentation can they.
Thank god we know this would never happen!!

... Illegals pay sales tax, and contrary to the chain email provided, most pay into social security (which they will never get back unless they become citizens and then pay in for another 10 years minimum) and also pay income tax.
Can you post the link you got your Dem talking points from? Also since this is a version of somebody trying to say its OK they are here ILLEGALLY because they help with sales tax, that side is a bunch of assholes and maybe even accessories to a crime

... US born children of illegals, who are documented and are citizens, can obtain medicaid and state children health insurance, not the Illegal parents. So this would go to your "anchor" baby, is a child born in the US really a US citizen argument. No problem with the kids, but DEFINITELY send the parents back home and let them become legal citizens you know lawfully

... Assistance obtained for families containing US citizens with an Illegal head of household is less than 1%, compared to the 5% "native" average. Its higher than 1% but they use that number since it looks good

... the cost to enforce immigrations laws and deport illegals is estimated to cost more per year than the entire annual budget of the DHS. Then cut education and welfare and increase the budget


... it's the emergency medical care and cost of public education where most of the money is lost.
Public education is an incredible waste of money for what we get, agreed.

... GAO estimates that over $1.3 billion is lost in fraudulent claims for unemployment. Only $30 million is estimated to be paid to Illegal aliens, or %2 of the fraudulent claims and less than 0.001% of total claims.
another justification for people being here ILLEGALLY, people that make this argument are assholes and may even be accessories to a crime.

I have no problem trying to rectify these issues, enforcing/reforming/being stricter with illegal immigration, welfare reform, tighter regulation of unemployment, etc. Most of the monetary problems we have with the system come from "Natives" abusing the system, not illegals. I'm more worried about the number of citizens (and I currently know some of these people), who are knowingly abusing the system and have no problem with it.
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by mainejeff »

Is this the official Tea Bagger :jack: :jack: :jack: :jack: :jack: thread?
Go Black Bears!
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by JMU DJ »

... and you can provide sources for your Repub chain mail Sprout, or are things that are inherently known to all too? :lol:


You have evidence that a majority don't pay taxes or is that just conjecture and hearsay?


But here ya go for paying taxes and social security:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8711 ... ration.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/05/busin ... 83&ei=5090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
blueballs
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2590
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
A.K.A.: blueballs
Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by blueballs »

Y'all are all aware that there is a black market for buying and selling social security numbers, right?
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

blueballs wrote:Y'all are all aware that there is a black market for buying and selling social security numbers, right?
And if they have one, they are still paying taxes, so that blows a hole in your "argument"
:thumb:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote:
blueballs wrote:Y'all are all aware that there is a black market for buying and selling social security numbers, right?
And if they have one, they are still paying taxes, so that blows a hole in your "argument"
Ya'll are aware that "having" a social security number doesn't mean they gave it to their employer, aren't you?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

AZGrizFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
And if they have one, they are still paying taxes, so that blows a hole in your "argument"
Ya'll are aware that "having" a social security number doesn't mean they gave it to their employer, aren't you?
if the employer didn't ask for it, then the employer is breaking laws than have always existed.
:thumb:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Ya'll are aware that "having" a social security number doesn't mean they gave it to their employer, aren't you?
if the employer didn't ask for it, then the employer is breaking laws than have always existed.
OMG. How could that EVER happen? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Maybe the employer is using THIS logic: If the US government is going to ignore their own laws regarding protecting our borders and let these folks across, then I'm going to ignore the law that requires me to check their immigration status.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

AZGrizFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
if the employer didn't ask for it, then the employer is breaking laws than have always existed.
OMG. How could that EVER happen? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Maybe the employer is using THIS logic: If the US government is going to ignore their own laws regarding protecting our borders and let these folks across, then I'm going to ignore the law that requires me to check their immigration status.
So once again you are absolving a BUSINESS of any responsibility.

And the US Government spending billions defending the border. Can they do more? Sure. But if there were no employers giving them jobs, then they would not be here.


And if an employer is not asking for SS# to avoid paying SS taxes, they probably don't care about the status of the worker...
:thumb:
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

And your absolving the ILLEGALS of any responsibility.
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by grizzaholic »

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:And your absolving the ILLEGALS of any responsibility.
But Alpha, it is the govt's responsibility to keep them out, not the other way around. Once they are here illegally they don't have to follow rules until they get caught.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
OMG. How could that EVER happen? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Maybe the employer is using THIS logic: If the US government is going to ignore their own laws regarding protecting our borders and let these folks across, then I'm going to ignore the law that requires me to check their immigration status.
So once again you are absolving a BUSINESS of any responsibility.

And the US Government spending billions defending the border. Can they do more? Sure. But if there were no employers giving them jobs, then they would not be here.

And if an employer is not asking for SS# to avoid paying SS taxes, they probably don't care about the status of the worker...
You absolve the government, I absolve businesses. The difference is, ONE of these two entities needs to make a LIVING. :coffee: :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

AZGrizFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
So once again you are absolving a BUSINESS of any responsibility.

And the US Government spending billions defending the border. Can they do more? Sure. But if there were no employers giving them jobs, then they would not be here.

And if an employer is not asking for SS# to avoid paying SS taxes, they probably don't care about the status of the worker...
You absolve the government, I absolve businesses. The difference is, ONE of these two entities needs to make a LIVING. :coffee: :coffee:
They must not teach reading comprehension at Idaho.

I am not absolving Government. Can the Feds do more? Sure. Enforcing/beefing up sanctions against the employers would be a great start. Deploying more live bodies on the border is needed. Don't destroy the economies/governments of the sources of immigration. Instead of spending trillions in Iraq, spend it in the Western Hemisphere.
:thumb:
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by grizzaholic »

dbackjon wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
You absolve the government, I absolve businesses. The difference is, ONE of these two entities needs to make a LIVING. :coffee: :coffee:
They must not teach reading comprehension at Idaho.

I am not absolving Government. Can the Feds do more? Sure. Enforcing/beefing up sanctions against the employers would be a great start. Deploying more live bodies on the border is needed. Don't destroy the economies/governments of the sources of immigration. Instead of spending trillions in Iraq, spend it in the Western Hemisphere.

So.....bomb Mexico? :?
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by dbackjon »

grizzaholic wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
They must not teach reading comprehension at Idaho.

I am not absolving Government. Can the Feds do more? Sure. Enforcing/beefing up sanctions against the employers would be a great start. Deploying more live bodies on the border is needed. Don't destroy the economies/governments of the sources of immigration. Instead of spending trillions in Iraq, spend it in the Western Hemisphere.

So.....bomb Mexico? :?

No - that would kill gay and straight Mexicans alike, unless there is a "straight" bomb.
:thumb:
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by grizzaholic »

dbackjon wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:

So.....bomb Mexico? :?

No - that would kill gay and straight Mexicans alike, unless there is a "straight" bomb.
:roll:
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

dbackjon wrote: No - that would kill gay and straight Mexicans alike, unless there is a "straight" bomb.

Speaking of bombs..............................................see your joke.
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by 89Hen »

dbackjon wrote:
blueballs wrote:Y'all are all aware that there is a black market for buying and selling social security numbers, right?
And if they have one, they are still paying taxes, so that blows a hole in your "argument"
:lol: :rofl:

Yeah, all these guys waiting to get picked up for work give their SS#'s to the guy in the pick-up so they can report their taxes. Oh Jon, you slay me.

Image
Image
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

Post by Skjellyfetti »

89Hen wrote: :lol: :rofl:

Yeah, all these guys waiting to get picked up for work give their SS#'s to the guy in the pick-up so they can report their taxes. Oh Jon, you slay me.
Poor white manual laborers do the same thing...
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Post Reply