Page 1 of 2

Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:33 am
by D1B
Maybe there is a benevolent god? The American Southeast/Gulf States is without a doubt the anus of the worlld - full of racist, violent, stupid low brow motherfuckers who essentially elected assholes like the Bush's and Reagan. They got what they deserve. :nod:

I hope they never recover and I hope the spill ravages Florida and Texas more in the future. Fuck nuking Iran or N. Korea. We could solve alot of the world's problems by wiping Florida and Texas off the face of the earth.

:thumb:

Re: Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:50 am
by ASUG8
Within 40 feet of me here at work we have people from:
Pennsylvania
Minnesota
Ohio
Virginia
Rhode Island
Wisconsin
Delaware
Michigan
California
Maryland

Clearly the South sucks since it draws from all over. I NEVER see cars from out of state when I visit our beaches or mountains. :sarcasm: :rofl:

Apology accepted. :coffee:

Re: Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:28 am
by Rob Iola
If this had happened in Iowa it would've been capped, bottled (barrelled?), and sold by now...

Re: Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:38 am
by ASUG8
Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:50 am
by Col Hogan
ASUG8 wrote:Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:
Stop it...

You're using truth and logic...that's not allowed in debates with DouchBag... :geek:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:55 am
by ASUG8
Col Hogan wrote:
ASUG8 wrote:Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:
Stop it...

You're using truth and logic...that's not allowed in debates with DouchBag... :geek:
Sorry - I tend to feed the trolls sometimes. My bad. :oops:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:29 am
by ASUMountaineer
D1B wrote:Maybe there is a benevolent god? The American Southeast/Gulf States is without a doubt the anus of the worlld - full of racist, violent, stupid low brow motherfuckers who essentially elected ******* like the Bush's and Reagan. They got what they deserve. :nod:

I hope they never recover and I hope the spill ravages Florida and Texas more in the future. **** nuking Iran or N. Korea. We could solve alot of the world's problems by wiping Florida and Texas off the face of the earth.

:thumb:
You're so cute. :lol:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:40 am
by Baldy
D1B wrote:Maybe there is a benevolent god? The American Southeast/Gulf States is without a doubt the anus of the worlld - full of racist, violent, stupid low brow motherfuckers who essentially elected ******* like the Bush's and Reagan. They got what they deserve. :nod:

I hope they never recover and I hope the spill ravages Florida and Texas more in the future. **** nuking Iran or N. Korea. We could solve alot of the world's problems by wiping Florida and Texas off the face of the earth.

:thumb:
i guess you dumbfucks should have given the South their independence when you had the chance. :lol:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:55 am
by Ivytalk
D1B wrote:Maybe there is a benevolent god? The American Southeast/Gulf States is without a doubt the anus of the worlld - full of racist, violent, stupid low brow motherfuckers who essentially elected ******* like the Bush's and Reagan. They got what they deserve. :nod:

I hope they never recover and I hope the spill ravages Florida and Texas more in the future. **** nuking Iran or N. Korea. We could solve alot of the world's problems by wiping Florida and Texas off the face of the earth.

:thumb:
Hittin' the Jagermeister kinda early, huh? :roll:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:23 am
by Skjellyfetti
Cocksucker!

Any state in the South is far better than Iowa.

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:32 am
by dbackjon
Skjellyfetti wrote:Cocksucker!

Any state in the South is far better than Iowa.
Does that include states in Southern Mexico?

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:39 am
by GannonFan
ASUG8 wrote:Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:
Interestingly enough, Iowa went heavy for Reagan, twice - Reagan beat Carter by 14% pts in '80 and Iowa gave Reagan an 8% pts win in '84 over the darling of a neighboring state in Mondale. And of course Iowa also went with Bush in '04. Who knew Iowa was so far South?? :rofl:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:58 am
by D1B
Col Hogan wrote:
ASUG8 wrote:Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:
Stop it...

You're using truth and logic...that's not allowed in debates with DouchBag... :geek:

Fine, people from the South are primarily responsible for the modern republican party and fucks like Reagan and the Bush assholes, especially W. You're ignorant, violent and conservative. The world would be a better place if we just blew you all to smithereens.

Oh, fuck you pedophile-protector Hogan. :ohno:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:59 am
by D1B
GannonFan wrote:
ASUG8 wrote:Do some research next time by the way.

In 1980, Reagan carried 44 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1980" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1984, Reagan carried 49 states including yours
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In 1988, Bush carried 40 states
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... tion,_1988" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bush II carried 30 and 31 states in 2000 and 2004. Some of these states weren't even in the South oddly enough. :coffee:
Interestingly enough, Iowa went heavy for Reagan, twice - Reagan beat Carter by 14% pts in '80 and Iowa gave Reagan an 8% pts win in '84 over the darling of a neighboring state in Mondale. And of course Iowa also went with Bush in '04. Who knew Iowa was so far South?? :rofl:

Who gives a fuck? The South is republican, period. Glad their soaking in oil, they deserve it and it's gonna get worse, hopefully. :nod:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:13 pm
by grizzaholic
D1B wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Interestingly enough, Iowa went heavy for Reagan, twice - Reagan beat Carter by 14% pts in '80 and Iowa gave Reagan an 8% pts win in '84 over the darling of a neighboring state in Mondale. And of course Iowa also went with Bush in '04. Who knew Iowa was so far South?? :rofl:

Who gives a fuck? The South is republican, period. Glad their soaking in oil, they deserve it and it's gonna get worse, hopefully. :nod:

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :roll:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:47 pm
by D1B
grizzaholic wrote:
D1B wrote:

Who gives a fuck? The South is republican, period. Glad their soaking in oil, they deserve it and it's gonna get worse, hopefully. :nod:

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :roll:

Fuck em. Time to take the gloves off and hold those pricks accountable. They'll ruin everything. Look at what those fucks did to America. :ohno:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:48 pm
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :roll:

Fuck em. Time to take the gloves off and hold those pricks accountable. They'll ruin everything. Look at what those fucks did to America. :ohno:
You're a racist, bigoted fuck if you don't like those wonderful folks from the American Southeast. :kisswink: :kisswink: :kisswink:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:04 pm
by Skjellyfetti
dbackjon wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:Cocksucker!

Any state in the South is far better than Iowa.
Does that include states in Southern Mexico?
Yes, indeed. Oaxaca and Chiapas are the shit. :ugeek:

Re: Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:05 pm
by Ibanez
Jeff, your freedom of speech should be revoked for it's incredible ignorance. Grow up, Peter Pan.

Re: Oil Disaster: Fucks in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:01 pm
by D1B
Ibanez wrote:Jeff, your freedom of speech should be revoked for it's incredible ignorance. Grow up, Peter Pan.

Fuck you. Southern man needs to go. Nothing better than an ecological disaster of biblical proportion or a never ending war to hopefully put you fuckers away for a while. You're a scourge to humanity - violent, stupid and self-centered. :ohno:

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:09 pm
by D1B
Skjellyfetti wrote:Cocksucker!

Any state in the South is far better than Iowa.
Close, but doubtful. People in Iowa at least work hard for a living. :nod:

I live in Wisconsin. Georgia is tolerable in my book. The rest can go to hell.

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:24 pm
by JohnStOnge
D1B wrote:Maybe there is a benevolent god? The American Southeast/Gulf States is without a doubt the anus of the worlld - full of racist, violent, stupid low brow motherfuckers who essentially elected ******* like the Bush's and Reagan. They got what they deserve. :nod:

LOL! Yeah and they're much more rude than people from the midwest. ROTFL!!!

We're going to be fine. We've enjoyed the economic benefits of being in an oil rich region for many decades. Now one of the risks have been realized and it'll tweak us some. But we'll be fine.

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:30 pm
by JohnStOnge
Georgia is tolerable in my book. The rest can go to hell.
Since I know you like to fish, I must assume you either never went fishing in Louisiana or else didn't go with someone who knew what to do. The fishing in Louisiana is much, MUCH better than the fishing in Georgia. Not that the fishing in Georgia is bad. But I lived in Georgia for five years and the thing I missed MOST when I was living there was the fishing in Louisiana. Even now it's great. Lots of places you can't go now because of conservative closures to all fishing due to the oil spill. But if you could go to them you'd still catch fish as long as you stay away from the patchy oil. And, no, they won't be contaminated for various reasons including the fact that they just move out of the way because they have plenty of space to do that.

Plus there are still plenty of open waters. And there's the inland fishing; which is also great.

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:43 pm
by JohnStOnge
BTW, I've been through all the NOAA Mussel Watch data in detail as part of my job. If you're thinking you have to worry about contaminated fish and shellfish under normal circumstances in Louisiana, you are mistaken. There is much more of a problem in other areas such as, for example, the Great Lakes region. Not that you have to really worry about fish from the Great Lakes either. Yeah, you'll read some stuff that might scare you but levels of concern are based on unrealistic assumptions like people eating something like 10 pounds of fish tissue per month for five years straight or even for 70 years.

I'm sure there will be some short term elevations in PAH levels in oysters and crustaceans in Louisiana waters impacted by the oil spill. They are unlikely to reach levels high enough to be a real threat to human health. I know that because I know they have rarely reached such levels in association with previous oil spills such as Exxon Valdez, etc., even in the most heavily oiled areas. And the levels I'm talking about are conservative to begin with because, as noted, they assume people eat way more seafood over time than they really do.

Re: Oil Disaster: **** in the South deserve it

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:01 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Would populations of mussels be the best gauge to the overall effect of the oil spill? Don't mussels live burrowed in mud?

Also, what do you do for a living (if you don't mind me asking)? It will be rich with irony if you turn out to work for some government agency. ;)