Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

GREAT actor!

mainejeff wrote:GREAT actor!

Yup!

mainejeff wrote:GREAT actor!

Great Actor
Great Fagguly

native wrote:

mainejeff wrote:GREAT actor!

Yup!

What else was he in? Seriously, I don't know.

89Hen wrote:

native wrote:
Yup!

What else was he in? Seriously, I don't know.

Magneto (X-Men)

89Hen wrote:

native wrote:
Yup!

What else was he in? Seriously, I don't know.

The Da Vinci Code

Was I supposed to somehow NOT know Ian MacKellan is gay?

He has only been out of the closet for years.

I am going to take away your fag credentials, MJ.

BTW-

There's an excellent fudge-packer movie with him and Brendan Fraser called "Gods and Monsters."

I highly recommend it.

CID1990 wrote:Was I supposed to somehow NOT know Ian MacKellan is gay?

He has only been out of the closet for years.

I am going to take away your fag credentials, MJ.

MJ......I didn't start this thread, you fvckin queer.

CID1990 wrote:BTW-

There's an excellent fudge-packer movie with him and Brendan Fraser called "Gods and Monsters."

I highly recommend it.

Faggot.

Sorry, MJ.

I get all you pillow biters mixed up from time to time.

To be more precise, some people are homosexual. "Gay" can mean homosexual because for some reason homosexuals decided to hijack the word. But the original meaning of "gay" is "happy." So, even though our language has been contaminated by the homosexual movement so that a word that once exclusively meant "happy" now also means "homosexual," there are still people who are "gay" who are not "homosexual" at any given time.

Then there's the irony associated with the fact that homosexual people are probably less likely to be happy than other people. And, no, I haven't looked up the statistics yet. But I know that the whole point of the "homosexuality is normal" movement is that homosexuals would be just as happy on average as everybody else if it wasn't for other people discriminating against them.

I need to get a T shirt made that says, "Being homosexual is abnormal. Get over it."

JohnStOnge wrote:I need to get a T shirt made that says, "Being homosexual is abnormal. Get over it."

Please do it, and march yourself down to the gay pride parade in San Francisco and let the biggest, queerest-looking dude there know just how you feel. We support you courageous efforts.

Please do it, and march yourself down to the gay pride parade in San Francisco and let the biggest, queerest-looking dude there know just how you feel. We support you courageous efforts.

Oh. So if somebody could beat me up it makes me wrong?

JohnStOnge wrote:

Please do it, and march yourself down to the gay pride parade in San Francisco and let the biggest, queerest-looking dude there know just how you feel. We support you courageous efforts.

Oh. So if somebody could beat me up it makes me wrong?

No, you're already wrong. I just thought you could use some reinforcement.

JohnStOnge wrote:To be more precise, some people are homosexual. "Gay" can mean homosexual because for some reason homosexuals decided to hijack the word. But the original meaning of "gay" is "happy." So, even though our language has been contaminated by the homosexual movement so that a word that once exclusively meant "happy" now also means "homosexual," there are still people who are "gay" who are not "homosexual" at any given time.

Then there's the irony associated with the fact that homosexual people are probably less likely to be happy than other people. And, no, I haven't looked up the statistics yet. But I know that the whole point of the "homosexuality is normal" movement is that homosexuals would be just as happy on average as everybody else if it wasn't for other people discriminating against them.

Bitching about the inability to use the word gay as happy is abnormal...

And also probably gay.

kalm wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:To be more precise, some people are homosexual. "Gay" can mean homosexual because for some reason homosexuals decided to hijack the word. But the original meaning of "gay" is "happy." So, even though our language has been contaminated by the homosexual movement so that a word that once exclusively meant "happy" now also means "homosexual," there are still people who are "gay" who are not "homosexual" at any given time.

Then there's the irony associated with the fact that homosexual people are probably less likely to be happy than other people. And, no, I haven't looked up the statistics yet. But I know that the whole point of the "homosexuality is normal" movement is that homosexuals would be just as happy on average as everybody else if it wasn't for other people discriminating against them.

Bitching about the inability to use the word gay as happy is abnormal...

And also probably gay.

But it's still OK to use the word "dyke" as a structure to hold back water!

Ivytalk wrote: But it's still OK to use the word "dyke" as a structure to hold back water!

I still occasionally hear people (usually field or general grade officers trying to rally the troops during particularly challenging situations) say, "we need to stick a finger in the dyke".

That's a tough one to sit through without reacting.

CID1990 wrote:Sorry, MJ.

I get all you pillow biters mixed up from time to time.

I get you Cadet closet cases confused too.

No prob bud.

No, you're already wrong. I just thought you could use some reinforcement.

I am not wrong in stating that homosexuality is an abnormal condition. And that fact that you would even suggest that I am illustrates the "Emporer's New Clothes" syndrome afflicting this culture when it comes to this issue.

JohnStOnge wrote:

No, you're already wrong. I just thought you could use some reinforcement.

I am not wrong in stating that homosexuality is an abnormal condition. And that fact that you would even suggest that I am illustrates the "Emporer's New Clothes" syndrome afflicting this culture when it comes to this issue.

I can't call anything that God gives someone abnormal. It might put them in the minority, but it doesn't make them abnormal.

BTW, why do you think there is such resistance to calling the condition what it is? Why does the T shirt not say, "Some people are homosexual....?"

I think you know. It's because reminding people of the truth of the situation isn't consistent with achieving the desired effect. "Gay" doesn't quite bring home what's being described to the extent that the accurate term "homosexual" does. It's a "lipstick on a pig" strategy.

I can't call anything that God gives someone abnormal. It might put them in the minority, but it doesn't make them abnormal.

Really? I think you need to think about that statement. Are you saying there is no such thing as an abnormal condition?