Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

House Republicans on Thursday blocked a Democratic plan to provide billions of dollars for medical treatment to rescue workers and residents of New York City who suffered illnesses from the toxic dust and debris at ground zero.

A majority of the lawmakers in the chamber supported the bill, but the 255-to-159 vote fell short of the two-thirds margin needed under special rules that were used to bring the measure to the floor. In the end, 243 Democrats and 12 Republicans supported the measure; 155 Republicans and 4 Democrats opposed it.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year.

Republican opponents of the legislation expressed concern over the $7.4 billion cost of the program. But Democrats accused Republicans of being callous and vowed to bring the bill back for another vote in the fall.

Until now, the federal government has been appropriating money on an annual basis to monitor the health of people injured at ground zero and to provide them with medical treatment. But the bill’s supporters said there were problems with the year-to-year approach, including that money for the program was subject to the political whims of Congress and the White House.

The bill would have provided $3.2 billion over the next eight years to monitor and treat injuries stemming from exposure to toxic dust and debris at ground zero. New York City would have paid 10 percent of those health costs.

The bill also would have set aside $4.2 billion to reopen the Sept. 11 Victim Compensation Fund to provide compensation for any job and economic losses.

In addition, the bill contained a provision that would have allowed money from the Victim Compensation Fund to be paid out to anyone who receives payment under the pending settlement stemming from lawsuits that 10,000 rescue and cleanup workers filed against the city. At the moment, anyone who receives a settlement from the city could not receive compensation from the fund, according to the bill’s sponsors.

Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, a Democrat and one of the bill’s chief sponsors, expressed disappointment with the outcome, saying that it was a shame that many who opposed the measure “don’t understand the scope and severity of this health crisis.” But she expressed confidence that the House would pass the bill with a simple majority when Congress returned from its summer recess in September.

Representative Lamar Smith, a Republican from Texas, who opposed the bill, described it as an “irresponsible overreach” and asserted that it did not contain sufficient protections to prevent waste and fraud.

Representative Jerrold Nadler, another Democratic sponsor, called the rejection of the measure “heartless and unpatriotic.”

There are nearly 60,000 people enrolled in a variety of health-monitoring and treatment programs related to the 9/11 attacks, according to the sponsors of the bill. The federal government provides the bulk of the funding for those health programs.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year.

A majority of the lawmakers in the chamber supported the bill, but the 255-to-159 vote fell short of the two-thirds margin needed under special rules that were used to bring the measure to the floor. In the end, 243 Democrats and 12 Republicans supported the measure; 155 Republicans and 4 Democrats opposed it.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year.

Skjellyfetti wrote: Anthony Weiner from Brooklyn tells it like it is:
[youtube][/youtube]

Col Hogan wrote:Nice try kyjelly...you blame the GOP for something the Democrats did...

A majority of the lawmakers in the chamber supported the bill, but the 255-to-159 vote fell short of the two-thirds margin needed under special rules that were used to bring the measure to the floor. In the end, 243 Democrats and 12 Republicans supported the measure; 155 Republicans and 4 Democrats opposed it.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year.

The Democrats control the vote...the Democrats invoked the special rule, not the Republicans...


SHAME ON THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP...


Another kyjelly LIE!!!!!!!

Skjellyfetti wrote:

Col Hogan wrote:Nice try kyjelly...you blame the GOP for something the Democrats did...



The Democrats control the vote...the Democrats invoked the special rule, not the Republicans...


SHAME ON THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP...


Another kyjelly LIE!!!!!!!

They invoked the rule so they could get it passed because that way it comes to the floor quicker and they can get it passed before summer recess.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year

blueballs wrote:$7.4 billion for health benefits and compensation for job loss for an incident that happened nine years ago?????????

Did none of these people have health insurance (you bet your ass they did, they are overwhelmingly union)??? Can they not find another job in NINE YEARS????

Good grief folks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $7.4 BILLION dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That ain't chump change... let's assume 10,000 workers aided in the cleanup and we know 3,000+ people perished. If that is the case that is over $560,000 per person for people who have already received massive payouts, insurance benefits, and continued aid.

This is nothing more than a veiled union payoff under the guise of helping 9/11 folks. I call BS.

blueballs wrote:Did none of these people have health insurance (you bet your ass they did, they are overwhelmingly union)???

Baldy wrote:

blueballs wrote:$7.4 billion for health benefits and compensation for job loss for an incident that happened nine years ago?????????

Did none of these people have health insurance (you bet your ass they did, they are overwhelmingly union)??? Can they not find another job in NINE YEARS????

Good grief folks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $7.4 BILLION dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That ain't chump change... let's assume 10,000 workers aided in the cleanup and we know 3,000+ people perished. If that is the case that is over $560,000 per person for people who have already received massive payouts, insurance benefits, and continued aid.

This is nothing more than a veiled union payoff under the guise of helping 9/11 folks. I call BS.

THE voice of reason has spoken.

wildkyle wrote:Now the Democrats want to talk about 9-11. They want to forget about it or if they talk about it they say it was our fault that it happened

Skjellyfetti wrote:

House Republicans on Thursday blocked a Democratic plan to provide billions of dollars for medical treatment to rescue workers and residents of New York City who suffered illnesses from the toxic dust and debris at ground zero.

A majority of the lawmakers in the chamber supported the bill, but the 255-to-159 vote fell short of the two-thirds margin needed under special rules that were used to bring the measure to the floor. In the end, 243 Democrats and 12 Republicans supported the measure; 155 Republicans and 4 Democrats opposed it.

Democrats used rules requiring a wider majority for approval to prevent Republicans from offering amendments on the floor that would embarrass Democrats in an election year.

Republican opponents of the legislation expressed concern over the $7.4 billion cost of the program. But Democrats accused Republicans of being callous and vowed to bring the bill back for another vote in the fall.

Until now, the federal government has been appropriating money on an annual basis to monitor the health of people injured at ground zero and to provide them with medical treatment. But the bill’s supporters said there were problems with the year-to-year approach, including that money for the program was subject to the political whims of Congress and the White House.

The bill would have provided $3.2 billion over the next eight years to monitor and treat injuries stemming from exposure to toxic dust and debris at ground zero. New York City would have paid 10 percent of those health costs.

The bill also would have set aside $4.2 billion to reopen the Sept. 11 Victim Compensation Fund to provide compensation for any job and economic losses.

In addition, the bill contained a provision that would have allowed money from the Victim Compensation Fund to be paid out to anyone who receives payment under the pending settlement stemming from lawsuits that 10,000 rescue and cleanup workers filed against the city. At the moment, anyone who receives a settlement from the city could not receive compensation from the fund, according to the bill’s sponsors.

Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, a Democrat and one of the bill’s chief sponsors, expressed disappointment with the outcome, saying that it was a shame that many who opposed the measure “don’t understand the scope and severity of this health crisis.” But she expressed confidence that the House would pass the bill with a simple majority when Congress returned from its summer recess in September.

Representative Lamar Smith, a Republican from Texas, who opposed the bill, described it as an “irresponsible overreach” and asserted that it did not contain sufficient protections to prevent waste and fraud.

Representative Jerrold Nadler, another Democratic sponsor, called the rejection of the measure “heartless and unpatriotic.”

There are nearly 60,000 people enrolled in a variety of health-monitoring and treatment programs related to the 9/11 attacks, according to the sponsors of the bill. The federal government provides the bulk of the funding for those health programs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/nyreg ... tml?src=mv" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fucking cocksuckers.

Anthony Weiner from Brooklyn tells it like it is:
[youtube][/youtube]

Skjellyfetti wrote:**** cocksuckers.

Anthony Weiner from Brooklyn tells it like it is:

kalm wrote:

wildkyle wrote:Now the Democrats want to talk about 9-11. They want to forget about it or if they talk about it they say it was our fault that it happened

Were you a member of the Bush administration?

Gil Dobie wrote:Dems and Reps should be ashamed at the shape they are leaving America in for the next generation.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Funny how this Wiener is now wrapping himself in the American/9/11 flag so tightly. It is so great to see the Dems doing exactly what they rightly criticized a lot of Republicans for doing.

What a **** toolbag that guy is.