Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Say what you want about Muslims you whiney assed bitches, but they have this sh!t totally right.


Report: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment


CAIRO – Saudi media are reporting that a judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him.

Saudi Arabia enforces Islamic law and on occasion metes out punishments based on the ancient code of an eye-for-an-eye.

At least two Saudi newspapers reported Thursday that a judge in northwestern Tabuk province asked hospitals for a medical opinion on the question.

Okaz newspaper reports that a leading hospital in Riyadh responded that it could not do the operation. Two of the hospitals involved and the court were closed for the Saudi weekend and could not be reached for comment.

polsongrizz wrote:Say what you want about Muslims you whiney assed bitches, but they have this sh!t totally right.


Report: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment


CAIRO – Saudi media are reporting that a judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him.

Saudi Arabia enforces Islamic law and on occasion metes out punishments based on the ancient code of an eye-for-an-eye.

At least two Saudi newspapers reported Thursday that a judge in northwestern Tabuk province asked hospitals for a medical opinion on the question.

Okaz newspaper reports that a leading hospital in Riyadh responded that it could not do the operation. Two of the hospitals involved and the court were closed for the Saudi weekend and could not be reached for comment.

so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

WAS it the right one or just one you made up in your head? Would you be okay if someone parked a moving van outside of timmy's Catholic Church?

AZGrizFan wrote:so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

Oh God. Here goes Z with the analogies again. You just don't grasp the concept.

AZGrizFan wrote:

polsongrizz wrote:Say what you want about Muslims you whiney assed bitches, but they have this sh!t totally right.


Report: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment


CAIRO – Saudi media are reporting that a judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him.

Saudi Arabia enforces Islamic law and on occasion metes out punishments based on the ancient code of an eye-for-an-eye.

At least two Saudi newspapers reported Thursday that a judge in northwestern Tabuk province asked hospitals for a medical opinion on the question.

Okaz newspaper reports that a leading hospital in Riyadh responded that it could not do the operation. Two of the hospitals involved and the court were closed for the Saudi weekend and could not be reached for comment.

so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

Absolutely, in fact I hope it happens.

Clearly, the lack of college football is clouding people's thinking. Dear God, let September be here soon. Amen.

89Hen wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

Oh God. Here goes Z with the analogies again. You just don't grasp the concept.

Please provide an example of a proper analogy, fuckhead.

AZGrizFan wrote:

89Hen wrote: Oh God. Here goes Z with the analogies again. You just don't grasp the concept.

Please provide an example of a proper analogy, fuckhead.

Z, getting his ass kicked in a thread, again, and so early!

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Please provide an example of a proper analogy, fuckhead.

Z, getting his ass kicked in a thread, again, and so early!

Hey, fuck you, asshole. 89 has already been removed from my Christmas card list, and you're RIGHT ON THE EDGE, buster.

AZGrizFan wrote:

89Hen wrote: Oh God. Here goes Z with the analogies again. You just don't grasp the concept.

Please provide an example of a proper analogy, fuckhead.

Yeah, I didn't think so, fuckhead.

AZGrizFan wrote:

polsongrizz wrote:Say what you want about Muslims you whiney assed bitches, but they have this sh!t totally right.


Report: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment


CAIRO – Saudi media are reporting that a judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him.

Saudi Arabia enforces Islamic law and on occasion metes out punishments based on the ancient code of an eye-for-an-eye.

At least two Saudi newspapers reported Thursday that a judge in northwestern Tabuk province asked hospitals for a medical opinion on the question.

Okaz newspaper reports that a leading hospital in Riyadh responded that it could not do the operation. Two of the hospitals involved and the court were closed for the Saudi weekend and could not be reached for comment.

so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

Well, in p-griz's example, the person getting the punishment is the person receiving the same punishment...eye for an eye...his eye...or in this case his back.

In your example, there are thousands of people getting hurt that had nothing to do with the offense.

Just saying...

You think living under sharia law is the way to go? You go live with it. Nothing but a bunch of barbaric vengful nutjobs in my book.

Cluck U wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

Well, in p-griz's example, the person getting the punishment is the person receiving the same punishment...eye for an eye...his eye...or in this case his back.

In your example, there are thousands of people getting hurt that had nothing to do with the offense.

Just saying...

Weren't there thousands of people hurt in the ORIGINAL offense that had nothing to do with anything?

AZGrizFan wrote:

Cluck U wrote:
Well, in p-griz's example, the person getting the punishment is the person receiving the same punishment...eye for an eye...his eye...or in this case his back.

In your example, there are thousands of people getting hurt that had nothing to do with the offense.

Just saying...

Weren't there thousands of people hurt in the ORIGINAL offense that had nothing to do with anything?

Fuck dude you are really terrible at this. Yes is the answer to your question, that's obvious. To make an analogy of your poor analogy it would be like this defendant causing this victim's paralysis and then the judge orders that some random guy the defendant may have met to be paralyzed. You do see the difference here don't you?

That would not be an eye for an eye punishment it would be an eye for any random eye punishment and therefore the effectiveness of the deterrent would be lost.

You are very bad at analogies but I'm going to make up a word and say that you may be the finest Amalgamationalogist I've ever seen.

CSUBUCDAD wrote:You think living under sharia law is the way to go? You go live with it. Nothing but a bunch of barbaric vengful nutjobs in my book.

Says Glenn Beck's biggest fan!

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Weren't there thousands of people hurt in the ORIGINAL offense that had nothing to do with anything?

Fuck dude you are really terrible at this. Yes is the answer to your question, that's obvious. To make an analogy of your poor analogy it would be like this defendant causing this victim's paralysis and then the judge orders that some random guy the defendant may have met to be paralyzed. You do see the difference here don't you?

That would not be an eye for an eye punishment it would be an eye for any random eye punishment and therefore the effectiveness of the deterrent would be lost.

You are very bad at analogies but I'm going to make up a word and say that you may be the finest Amalgamationalogist I've ever seen.

fine. Then I change my analogy to an eye for a random eye.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: Fuck dude you are really terrible at this. Yes is the answer to your question, that's obvious. To make an analogy of your poor analogy it would be like this defendant causing this victim's paralysis and then the judge orders that some random guy the defendant may have met to be paralyzed. You do see the difference here don't you?

That would not be an eye for an eye punishment it would be an eye for any random eye punishment and therefore the effectiveness of the deterrent would be lost.

You are very bad at analogies but I'm going to make up a word and say that you may be the finest Amalgamationalogist I've ever seen.

fine. Then I change my analogy to an eye for a random eye.

You just snatched victory from the jaws of defeat my man. Well played sir.

AZGrizFan wrote:

polsongrizz wrote:Say what you want about Muslims you whiney assed bitches, but they have this sh!t totally right.


Report: Saudi judge considers paralysis punishment


CAIRO – Saudi media are reporting that a judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him.

Saudi Arabia enforces Islamic law and on occasion metes out punishments based on the ancient code of an eye-for-an-eye.

At least two Saudi newspapers reported Thursday that a judge in northwestern Tabuk province asked hospitals for a medical opinion on the question.

Okaz newspaper reports that a leading hospital in Riyadh responded that it could not do the operation. Two of the hospitals involved and the court were closed for the Saudi weekend and could not be reached for comment.

so then, you'd be fine with someone flying a plane into their planned mosque when it's full of evening prayers, you know, in the old eye-for-an-eye punishment mentality?

I was thinking about three well placed cruise missles would do the trick... no reason to kill innocent passengers and pilots or destroy a pefectly operational aircraft.