Page 1 of 1

Rewriting Kennedy History

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:55 am
by Col Hogan
Yep, the revisionsts are hard at work trying to improve Ted Kennedy's image...

If you believe the latest, Teddy boy can't be held responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death because Teddy (it is theorized) suffered a concussion...
Now, a year after Kennedy died, his lifelong biographer Burton Hersh, armed with fresh interviews with Kennedy's mistress at the time, tells Whispers that the whole July 1969 episode should have been handled as a simple crash, leaving the senator's legacy untainted. "It was a car accident," he says. "Ted was a terrible driver. He never paid much attention to where he was going."

"He took a tremendous blow on the head," says Hersh. In interviews following the crash, Kennedy displayed confusion and amnesia, he says.

"If the thing had been handled properly, the first thing they would have done is put him in a hospital. Then they would have said he was a victim of an auto accident and didn't know what he was doing and couldn't be held responsible for anything that happened really after that, which would have been a fair explanation," says author-journalist Hersh, who knew Kennedy since they were classmates at Harvard. "But instead, he felt terribly guilty about the whole thing ... tried to take responsibility and ... just confused the issue."
http://politics.usnews.com/news/blogs/w ... k-accident" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hersh says Teddy had no interest in Kopechne' because "she wasn't a bimbo"...
He also brushes off tales that Kennedy was a playboy more than a lawmaker. "Kennedy's central project was accomplishing as much as he could in public life. And all of the things, including the drinking, the women, and the rest, were sort of supportive activities. They were amusements."

Re: Rewriting Kennedy History

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:12 pm
by HI54UNI
:ohno: :ohno:

Re: Rewriting Kennedy History

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:50 pm
by BlueHen86
Col Hogan wrote:Yep, the revisionsts are hard at work trying to improve Ted Kennedy's image...

If you believe the latest, Teddy boy can't be held responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death because Teddy (it is theorized) suffered a concussion...
Now, a year after Kennedy died, his lifelong biographer Burton Hersh, armed with fresh interviews with Kennedy's mistress at the time, tells Whispers that the whole July 1969 episode should have been handled as a simple crash, leaving the senator's legacy untainted. "It was a car accident," he says. "Ted was a terrible driver. He never paid much attention to where he was going."

"He took a tremendous blow on the head," says Hersh. In interviews following the crash, Kennedy displayed confusion and amnesia, he says.

"If the thing had been handled properly, the first thing they would have done is put him in a hospital. Then they would have said he was a victim of an auto accident and didn't know what he was doing and couldn't be held responsible for anything that happened really after that, which would have been a fair explanation," says author-journalist Hersh, who knew Kennedy since they were classmates at Harvard. "But instead, he felt terribly guilty about the whole thing ... tried to take responsibility and ... just confused the issue."
http://politics.usnews.com/news/blogs/w ... k-accident" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hersh says Teddy had no interest in Kopechne' because "she wasn't a bimbo"...
He also brushes off tales that Kennedy was a playboy more than a lawmaker. "Kennedy's central project was accomplishing as much as he could in public life. And all of the things, including the drinking, the women, and the rest, were sort of supportive activities. They were amusements."

That is not what the biographer said. Ted is still being responsible for the accident (and Kopechne's death), but is being given a pass for anything that happened after that (i.e. leaving the scene) due to a concussion.

I'm not saying I agree/disagree with the concussion theory, just stating my interpretation of what I read.

Re: Rewriting Kennedy History

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:19 pm
by Bronco
This would have been a good story to tell at the time but they didn't, and he was found after he sobered up with nary a scratch.



******

"Investigators found it difficult to understand why he was crossing Dyke Bridge when he said he was attempting to reach Edgartown which was in the opposite direction. They also could not understand why he was driving so fast on this unlit, uneven, road. They also could not work out how Kennedy escaped from the car. When it was recovered from the water all the doors were locked. Three of the windows were either open or smashed in. If Kennedy, a large-framed 6 foot 2 inches tall man could manage to get out of the car, why was it impossible for Kopechne, a slender 5 foot 2 inches tall, not do the same?

Local experts could not understand why Kennedy (and later, Markham and Gargan) could not rescue Kopechne from the car. It also surprised investigators that Kennedy did not seek help from Pierre Malm, who only lived 135 yards from the bridge. At the inquest Kennedy was unable to answer this question.

There were also doubts about the way Mary Jo Kopechne died. Dr. Donald Mills of Edgartown, wrote on the death certificate: "death by drowning". However, Gene Frieh, the undertaker, told reporters that death "was due to suffocation rather than drowning". John Farrar, the diver who removed Kopechne from the car, claimed she was "too buoyant to be full of water". It is assumed that she died from drowning, although her parents filed a petition preventing an autopsy."

Image