Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Is that McCain landslide you predicted still going to happen?

I believe OUR bet is that Obama would get 300 EV's. I took the under. THAT I am VERY certain of....

Not to jump into your little private party here but I heard that the worse the economy gets the better Obama's chances are for winning the election. Any truth to it?

AZGrizFan wrote:I believe OUR bet is that Obama would get 300 EV's. I took the under. THAT I am VERY certain of....

Yes, I know that.

But you also have been very certain that McCane would win, no problem...

grizzaholic wrote:Not to jump into your little private party here but I heard that the worse the economy gets the better Obama's chances are for winning the election. Any truth to it?

Probably...

http://electoral-vote.com/

Obama 349, McCain 174, 15 tied

dbackjon wrote:http://electoral-vote.com/

Obama 349, McCain 174, 15 tied

fickle....fickle.....

and, 2 weeks ago it was 282-256....so, things can change a LOT in 4 weeks.

AZGrizFan wrote:and, 2 weeks ago it was 282-256....so, things can change a LOT in 4 weeks.

Ah - the Palin bounce, before America found out what a Whacko she was...

You've been listening a bit too much to the wenches on the View, Jon. Sarah's not the whack-job. Nobama is. Raising taxes on small businesses in the midst of a finanical crisis is a sure way to ruin. In addition, many people want no part of a president with ties to terrorists and TRUE religious nut jobs.

SuperHornet wrote:You've been listening a bit too much to the wenches on the View, Jon. Sarah's not the whack-job. Nobama is. Raising taxes on small businesses in the midst of a finanical crisis is a sure way to ruin. In addition, many people want no part of a president with ties to terrorists and TRUE religious nut jobs.

I don't watch the view.

Obama is a million times the leader that Whacko Sarah will ever be.


And you need to examine the terrorist ties. Palin has more ties to terrorist.

And, PALIN IS A TRUE RELIGIOUS NUT JOB. SHE IS A CHRISTIAN TERRORIST

AZGrizFan wrote:I believe OUR bet is that Obama would get 300 EV's. I took the under. THAT I am VERY certain of....

Our bet was straight up electoral college winner.

dbackjon wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:You've been listening a bit too much to the wenches on the View, Jon. Sarah's not the whack-job. Nobama is. Raising taxes on small businesses in the midst of a finanical crisis is a sure way to ruin. In addition, many people want no part of a president with ties to terrorists and TRUE religious nut jobs.

I don't watch the view.

Obama is a million times the leader that Whacko Sarah will ever be.


And you need to examine the terrorist ties. Palin has more ties to terrorist.

And, PALIN IS A TRUE RELIGIOUS NUT JOB. SHE IS A CHRISTIAN TERRORIST

Woman hater...!!!

travelinman67 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
I don't watch the view.

Obama is a million times the leader that Whacko Sarah will ever be.


And you need to examine the terrorist ties. Palin has more ties to terrorist.

And, PALIN IS A TRUE RELIGIOUS NUT JOB. SHE IS A CHRISTIAN TERRORIST

Woman hater...!!!

LOL - I like OUR woman governor.


And I like women - just don't want to have sex with them...

Skjellyfetti wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:I believe OUR bet is that Obama would get 300 EV's. I took the under. THAT I am VERY certain of....

Our bet was straight up electoral college winner.

Yeah.


I gotta admit....THAT bet, I'm not feelin' too sure about right now....

SuperHornet wrote:You've been listening a bit too much to the wenches on the View, Jon. Sarah's not the whack-job. Nobama is. Raising taxes on small businesses in the midst of a finanical crisis is a sure way to ruin. In addition, many people want no part of a president with ties to terrorists and TRUE religious nut jobs.

Yes, taxes would be raised on those small businesses with profits over 250k. 95% of small businesses report a profit of less than 250k and would actually recieve a tax CUT. Beware the witches of Wasilla......

Appaholic wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:You've been listening a bit too much to the wenches on the View, Jon. Sarah's not the whack-job. Nobama is. Raising taxes on small businesses in the midst of a finanical crisis is a sure way to ruin. In addition, many people want no part of a president with ties to terrorists and TRUE religious nut jobs.

Yes, taxes would be raised on those small businesses with profits over 250k. 95% of small businesses report a profit of less than 250k and would actually recieve a tax CUT. Beware the witches of Wasilla......

...the effects of partying rear their ugly head...

Where in the fvcK did you get those stats, hillbilly! "...95% of small businesses report a profit of less than $250k..." ???

Even if that were true (and it isn't), using "$250K" as a defacto benchmark for a "successful" business that can afford a tax hike is a larger load of crap than Obama's plan for socialized medicine.

Want to help America? Restrict or monitor ALL transactions with overseas/offshore banks. Wealthy Americans and businesses have been pouring money into overseas/offshore accounts for years, with little oversight and no tax liability. There are a large number of businesses who launder a large portion of their cash transactions into accounts with no U.S. oversight. Clean up that mess (which won't happen as many in D.C. are party to that game), and you would fill Uncle Sam's coffers.

travelinman67 wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Yes, taxes would be raised on those small businesses with profits over 250k. 95% of small businesses report a profit of less than 250k and would actually recieve a tax CUT. Beware the witches of Wasilla......

...the effects of partying rear their ugly head...

Where in the fvcK did you get those stats, hillbilly! "...95% of small businesses report a profit of less than $250k..." ???

Even if that were true (and it isn't), using "$250K" as a defacto benchmark for a "successful" business that can afford a tax hike is a larger load of crap than Obama's plan for socialized medicine.

Want to help America? Restrict or monitor ALL transactions with overseas/offshore banks. Wealthy Americans and businesses have been pouring money into overseas/offshore accounts for years, with little oversight and no tax liability. There are a large number of businesses who launder a large portion of their cash transactions into accounts with no U.S. oversight. Clean up that mess (which won't happen as many in D.C. are party to that game), and you would fill Uncle Sam's coffers.

Just regurgitating facts from a source other than Limbaugh T-Man.....those are all good suggestions you made....why haven't the Republicans instituted them from 2000-2006.....re: oversight.....now which party has been rallying around de-regulation all these years?

Appaholic wrote:

travelinman67 wrote: ...the effects of partying rear their ugly head...

Where in the fvcK did you get those stats, hillbilly! "...95% of small businesses report a profit of less than $250k..." ???

Even if that were true (and it isn't), using "$250K" as a defacto benchmark for a "successful" business that can afford a tax hike is a larger load of crap than Obama's plan for socialized medicine.

Want to help America? Restrict or monitor ALL transactions with overseas/offshore banks. Wealthy Americans and businesses have been pouring money into overseas/offshore accounts for years, with little oversight and no tax liability. There are a large number of businesses who launder a large portion of their cash transactions into accounts with no U.S. oversight. Clean up that mess (which won't happen as many in D.C. are party to that game), and you would fill Uncle Sam's coffers.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008 ... 914&page=2

Appaholic wrote: Just regurgitating facts from a source other than Limbaugh T-Man.....those are all good suggestions you made....why haven't the Republicans instituted them from 2000-2006.....re: oversight.....now which party has been rallying around de-regulation all these years?

Oh, go blow a mountain goat, Virgil. You're starting to sound like UNHWildcats.

travelinman67 wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Just regurgitating facts from a source other than Limbaugh T-Man.....those are all good suggestions you made....why haven't the Republicans instituted them from 2000-2006.....re: oversight.....now which party has been rallying around de-regulation all these years?

Oh, go blow a mountain goat, Virgil. You're starting to sound like UNHWildcats.

Ah yes, the last vestige for the incorrect....personal insults.....I'll go look for a goat to give you more time to craft an educated response, Syntax.....

Appaholic wrote:

travelinman67 wrote: Oh, go blow a mountain goat, Virgil. You're starting to sound like UNHWildcats.

Ah yes, the last vestige for the incorrect....personal insults.....I'll go look for a goat to give you more time to craft an educated response, Syntax.....

OOOoooooo Burn.

grizzaholic wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Ah yes, the last vestige for the incorrect....personal insults.....I'll go look for a goat to give you more time to craft an educated response, Syntax.....

OOOoooooo Burn.

Quick, quick, someone ban somebody!

dbackjon wrote:
Obama is a million times the leader that Whacko Sarah will ever be.

really? What's he ever led?

BigApp wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
Obama is a million times the leader that Whacko Sarah will ever be.

really? What's he ever led?

.....the "Million Man March"....