Tax Cut Battle
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:35 pm

FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=20111

Penalty.HI54UNI wrote:Shouldn't you have to pay taxes to get a tax cut?

Not in the "donk wealth redistribution" world.HI54UNI wrote:Shouldn't you have to pay taxes to get a tax cut?
No. It's quantified.Cap'n Cat wrote:Penalty.HI54UNI wrote:Shouldn't you have to pay taxes to get a tax cut?
Tired old RushConk generalization and exaggeration.
![]()
So point me to the website with the paperwork for me to incorporate.Chizzang wrote:Jeezus...
If we all just incorporated ourselves none of this would matter at all
Corporations have more rights than citizens - pay less taxes - are not held accountable - and can fold up shop whenever they feel like it to protect themselves. Individual who incorporate can show very close to ZERO income while banking as much money as possible...
Why bother being a citizen..?
This country is designed for corporations to succeed not tax paying citizens
Citizenship to those who haved served in combat on behalf of the greatest nation on earth?CID1990 wrote:So point me to the website with the paperwork for me to incorporate.Chizzang wrote:Jeezus...
If we all just incorporated ourselves none of this would matter at all
Corporations have more rights than citizens - pay less taxes - are not held accountable - and can fold up shop whenever they feel like it to protect themselves. Individual who incorporate can show very close to ZERO income while banking as much money as possible...
Why bother being a citizen..?
This country is designed for corporations to succeed not tax paying citizens
US citizenship is cheaply bought and getting cheaper. Maybe we could try the Roman model?
The VAT is kinda sneaky, Robbie. Makes it hard to control and easy to get out of control.Rob Iola wrote:Simple solution - lower, flat income and corporate taxes, and a VAT. That basically sums up the Domenici/Rivlin bipartisan debt reduction task force's findings:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 05032.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
HI54UNI wrote:Shouldn't you have to pay taxes to get a tax cut?
I'm in favor of a VAT, as long as other taxes are reduced. If I see that my tax money is actually going to improve education, infrastructure, the financial enviroment, I wouldn't have a problem paying my share.Rob Iola wrote:Simple solution - lower, flat income and corporate taxes, and a VAT. That basically sums up the Domenici/Rivlin bipartisan debt reduction task force's findings:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 05032.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;