FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=20473
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 4754.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;93henfan wrote:Federal pay is going to be frozen for two years for civilians. You can all do a little victory dance as we get no raise while Wall Street execs at bailout firms continue to pay themselves millions in bonuses. Yay for the private sector!
President Obama will announce Monday morning that he wants to freeze pay for federal employees for the next two years, a move the administration says would save more than $5 billion between now and 2012.
The freeze would not apply to military personnel but rather to all other civilian employees on the federal payroll. Congress would have to approve the proposal in order for it to take effect.
The plan is part of Obama's effort to contain the $1.3 trillion federal deficit, and will be followed by more proposals for spending reductions over the next few months, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said Monday morning.
Federal employees undergo RIFs all the time. Try again.89Hen wrote:In related news, Federal employees are all keeping their jobs while hundreds of thousands in the private sector are fired or laid off.
Liar! Sure, I could shit everywhere but the rape would be grounds for termination.bandl wrote:Federal employees could rape their boss and shit in every coworkers desk and still not get fired.
So you've forgotten your roots? Do you beat your mother too?AZGrizFan wrote:I think it's BS the military is exempted.
They'd be fired if they didn't include any minorities.bandl wrote:Federal employees could rape their boss and shit in every coworkers desk and still not get fired.
No, I haven't forgotten my roots. But a federal employee is a federal employee is a federal employee. Share the pain equally.93henfan wrote:So you've forgotten your roots? Do you beat your mother too?AZGrizFan wrote:I think it's BS the military is exempted.
No, I'm being for seriousness. This really happened. All you have to do is say "I think I need to admit myself for mental health problems".93henfan wrote:Liar! Sure, I could shit everywhere but the rape would be grounds for termination.bandl wrote:Federal employees could rape their boss and shit in every coworkers desk and still not get fired.
Next hater.
Dummy, there AREN'T any minorities in the federal government. At least not in any important positions.Ibanez wrote:They'd be fired if they didn't include any minorities.bandl wrote:Federal employees could rape their boss and shit in every coworkers desk and still not get fired.
That ship has sailed. Military has been getting bigger raises than us for years. We are the most palatable whipping bitches. Congress passes their raise first and then comes after the lunchpale feds. How convenient?AZGrizFan wrote:No, I haven't forgotten my roots. But a federal employee is a federal employee is a federal employee. Share the pain equally.93henfan wrote:
So you've forgotten your roots? Do you beat your mother too?
No chance 93. They are rare for the Feds. Reductions in force for the Feds usually occurs when somebody leaves or retires and their position isn't filled... ie hiring freezes.93henfan wrote:Federal employees undergo RIFs all the time. Try again.
You need to brush up on your fed employment reading. RIFs happen all the time, especially in the age of BRAC.89Hen wrote:No chance 93. They are rare for the Feds. Reductions in force for the Feds usually occurs when somebody leaves or retires and their position isn't filled... ie hiring freezes.93henfan wrote:Federal employees undergo RIFs all the time. Try again.
Nope. You need to because they don't. See, I can play that game too.93henfan wrote:You need to brush up on your fed employment reading. RIFs happen all the time, especially in the age of BRAC.89Hen wrote: No chance 93. They are rare for the Feds. Reductions in force for the Feds usually occurs when somebody leaves or retires and their position isn't filled... ie hiring freezes.
Reading Is Fundamental? WTF does that have to do with this?93henfan wrote:You need to brush up on your fed employment reading. RIFs happen all the time, especially in the age of BRAC.89Hen wrote: No chance 93. They are rare for the Feds. Reductions in force for the Feds usually occurs when somebody leaves or retires and their position isn't filled... ie hiring freezes.
Except you're showing your cluelessness.89Hen wrote:Nope. You need to because they don't. See, I can play that game too.93henfan wrote:
You need to brush up on your fed employment reading. RIFs happen all the time, especially in the age of BRAC.
There is also a hiring freeze in effect as well.89Hen wrote:No chance 93. They are rare for the Feds. Reductions in force for the Feds usually occurs when somebody leaves or retires and their position isn't filled... ie hiring freezes.93henfan wrote:Federal employees undergo RIFs all the time. Try again.
No, you are.93henfan wrote:Except you're showing your cluelessness.89Hen wrote: Nope. You need to because they don't. See, I can play that game too.
Who is anti-gov? We're merely stating that one of the perks to Federal jobs is the job security. There are some people trying to pass legislation to have a reduction in force, but I'm sure you realize how hard it is to pass legislation to have any significan RIFs... then again, based on your posts above..93henfan wrote:You ladies discuss this amongst yourselves. I need to hit the road. I expect the anti-gov talk to be hot and heavy by the time I check back in.
