Page 1 of 2
JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:29 pm
by Cap'n Cat
Inspired from another thread.......
You conspiracist fvcks are crazy azzholes. Oswald acted alone. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a whackjob dork.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_bul ... Conspiracy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Discuss.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:37 pm
by 93henfan
Oswald was Marine Corps-trained in marksmanship. Of course he acted alone. He should be ashamed of himself for disgracing The Corps by scoring only a throat and a head from such a short distance. Marines qualify at 500 yards with iron sites for chrisakes. Dealey Plaza was pretty much point blank, and he had a scope. Any good Marine would have taken off three heads. Jackie was lucky Oswald was such a bad shot and basically wasted two good rounds before getting his shit together. The best I can figure is that he hadn't zeroed the scope and needed three shots to walk on to JFK's head with Kentucky windage.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:40 pm
by Cap'n Cat
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 7:57 pm
by Ivytalk
Jack Ruby, we hardly knew ye!

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 7:58 pm
by CID1990
I am going to go out on a limb here and say that Expandospanos or whatever his name is believes in the assassination conspiracy theories.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:13 pm
by HI54UNI
Well if Roseanne Barr, Jacob Godwin – Licensed Acupuncturist, and Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD – Professor Emerita of Feminist Theology all come out and say it is a conspiracy I will believe it.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:41 am
by Cap'n Cat
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:44 am
by youngterrier
wasn't the angle of the bullet slightly odd?
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:03 am
by UNHWildCats
youngterrier wrote:wasn't the angle of the bullet slightly odd?

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:08 am
by UNHWildCats
youngterrier wrote:wasn't the angle of the bullet slightly odd?

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:31 am
by youngterrier
thanks for the pics. Can I get an answer please? I'm just curious as I think there is more to the JFK assassination than the official story but only because some questions haven't been answered to me such as the bullet; at the same time I'm not a tinfoil hat guy
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:39 am
by Rob Iola
Hens and Ewu fans might want to take in a tour of the 6th Floor museum while down in the Dallas area - one of the best museums I've ever been to...
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:12 pm
by griz37
Oswald had to have acted alone, the government said so.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:28 pm
by 93henfan
1. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
2. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard the shots come from the vicinity of where Oswald shot from.
3. Eyewitnesses saw Oswald before and during the shooting.
4. Two men watching from a room directly below where Oswald shot from were startled by three shots they heard being fired above them, and they even heard three shell casings hit the floor.
5. A railroad worker in a tower was watching the grassy knoll from behind during the entire assassination time frame. He described the people standing there in great detail. None had a gun. None ran away. Nobody acted suspiciously along the stockade fence behind the grassy knoll. Witnesses that were along the fence at the top of the grassy knoll reported no shots fired from their immediate vicinity. It seems pretty darn clear there was no shooter there.
6. The single bullet theory has been validated/replicated multiple times. The science makes sense.
These are the elephants in the room that the conspiracy advocates conveniently gloss over every time. Are there all kinds of angles and mistakes to exploit in the official investigations? Absolutely.
But...
You eat what Oliver Stone and the conspiracy nuts (all who profit from your interest) are spoon feeding you if you so choose, but I prefer to lean on facts.
Oswald acted alone.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:20 pm
by youngterrier
works for me,thanks 93
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:58 pm
by Grizo406
93henfan wrote:1. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
2. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard the shots come from the vicinity of where Oswald shot from.
3. Eyewitnesses saw Oswald before and during the shooting.
4. Two men watching from a room directly below where Oswald shot from were startled by three shots they heard being fired above them, and they even heard three shell casings hit the floor.
5. A railroad worker in a tower was watching the grassy knoll from behind during the entire assassination time frame. He described the people standing there in great detail. None had a gun. None ran away. Nobody acted suspiciously along the stockade fence behind the grassy knoll. Witnesses that were along the fence at the top of the grassy knoll reported no shots fired from their immediate vicinity. It seems pretty darn clear there was no shooter there.
6. The single bullet theory has been validated/replicated multiple times. The science makes sense.
These are the elephants in the room that the conspiracy advocates conveniently gloss over every time. Are there all kinds of angles and mistakes to exploit in the official investigations? Absolutely.
But...
You eat what Oliver Stone and the conspiracy nuts (all who profit from your interest) are spoon feeding you if you so choose, but I prefer to lean on facts.
Oswald acted alone.
So, you're showin' off now, huh?
You've proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are one of the few comic geniuses on CS.com! It's ever so nice to know that I'm not alone in that arena.
Now, you gotta' go and show how smart you are? Not necessary...you had me at Steve Perry!
Nice work! Agree completely!!

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:50 pm
by CID1990
93henfan wrote:1. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
2. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard the shots come from the vicinity of where Oswald shot from.
3. Eyewitnesses saw Oswald before and during the shooting.
4. Two men watching from a room directly below where Oswald shot from were startled by three shots they heard being fired above them, and they even heard three shell casings hit the floor.
5. A railroad worker in a tower was watching the grassy knoll from behind during the entire assassination time frame. He described the people standing there in great detail. None had a gun. None ran away. Nobody acted suspiciously along the stockade fence behind the grassy knoll. Witnesses that were along the fence at the top of the grassy knoll reported no shots fired from their immediate vicinity. It seems pretty darn clear there was no shooter there.
6. The single bullet theory has been validated/replicated multiple times. The science makes sense.
These are the elephants in the room that the conspiracy advocates conveniently gloss over every time. Are there all kinds of angles and mistakes to exploit in the official investigations? Absolutely.
But...
You eat what Oliver Stone and the conspiracy nuts (all who profit from your interest) are spoon feeding you if you so choose, but I prefer to lean on facts.
Oswald acted alone.
Oliver Stone has made a fortune off of factualizing fiction. He has never, in the course of his career, produced any movie that even approached factual accuracy.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:10 am
by Ibanez
93henfan wrote:1. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
2. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard the shots come from the vicinity of where Oswald shot from.
3. Eyewitnesses saw Oswald before and during the shooting.
4. Two men watching from a room directly below where Oswald shot from were startled by three shots they heard being fired above them, and they even heard three shell casings hit the floor.
5. A railroad worker in a tower was watching the grassy knoll from behind during the entire assassination time frame. He described the people standing there in great detail. None had a gun. None ran away. Nobody acted suspiciously along the stockade fence behind the grassy knoll. Witnesses that were along the fence at the top of the grassy knoll reported no shots fired from their immediate vicinity. It seems pretty darn clear there was no shooter there.
6. The single bullet theory has been validated/replicated multiple times. The science makes sense.
These are the elephants in the room that the conspiracy advocates conveniently gloss over every time. Are there all kinds of angles and mistakes to exploit in the official investigations? Absolutely.
But...
You eat what Oliver Stone and the conspiracy nuts (all who profit from your interest) are spoon feeding you if you so choose, but I prefer to lean on facts.
Oswald acted alone.
Very true, but you failed to mention MOTIVE!
LHO was trained by the Marine Corps and given the task by the mob and the CIA. The Mob hated how he "turned his back" on them and the CIA disliked him b/c he was Catholic. THESE are the facts, a guy with white hair told me. His communist and pro Cuba activites were part of his cover.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:48 am
by blueballs
Doesn't matter... he was and remains the original "Dead Kennedy." His ass is on the wrong side of the grass and that's that.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:16 am
by 93henfan
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:19 pm
by JoltinJoe
93henfan wrote:1. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard three shots
2. The vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said they heard the shots come from the vicinity of where Oswald shot from.
3. Eyewitnesses saw Oswald before and during the shooting.
4. Two men watching from a room directly below where Oswald shot from were startled by three shots they heard being fired above them, and they even heard three shell casings hit the floor.
5. A railroad worker in a tower was watching the grassy knoll from behind during the entire assassination time frame. He described the people standing there in great detail. None had a gun. None ran away. Nobody acted suspiciously along the stockade fence behind the grassy knoll. Witnesses that were along the fence at the top of the grassy knoll reported no shots fired from their immediate vicinity. It seems pretty darn clear there was no shooter there.
6. The single bullet theory has been validated/replicated multiple times. The science makes sense.
These are the elephants in the room that the conspiracy advocates conveniently gloss over every time. Are there all kinds of angles and mistakes to exploit in the official investigations? Absolutely.
But...
You eat what Oliver Stone and the conspiracy nuts (all who profit from your interest) are spoon feeding you if you so choose, but I prefer to lean on facts.
Oswald acted alone.
Does the fact that Oswald was a lone gunman mean that he definitely acted alone?
I have to admit that the fact that Jack Ruby had some connection to the mob has always lingered in my mind ....
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 7:25 am
by houndawg
93henfan wrote:Oswald was Marine Corps-trained in marksmanship. Of course he acted alone. He should be ashamed of himself for disgracing The Corps by scoring only a throat and a head from such a short distance. Marines qualify at 500 yards with iron sites for chrisakes. Dealey Plaza was pretty much point blank, and he had a scope. Any good Marine would have taken off three heads. Jackie was lucky Oswald was such a bad shot and basically wasted two good rounds before getting his **** together. The best I can figure is that he hadn't zeroed the scope and needed three shots to walk on to JFK's head with Kentucky windage.
Likely the cause of his bad shooting, couldn't shut up long enough to get a good shot off.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:49 am
by COBBLESTONE
I think Oswald acted alone as far as pulling the trigger. I do think he wanted and was willing to be the lone gunman. However, it is a fact that RFK made a ton of enemies from the mafia when he was his brother's AG. I wouldn't be too shocked if Oswald did get some backing and financing from mafia bosses. I think that is as far as it goes though.
Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 7:23 pm
by 93henfan
houndawg wrote:93henfan wrote:Oswald was Marine Corps-trained in marksmanship. Of course he acted alone. He should be ashamed of himself for disgracing The Corps by scoring only a throat and a head from such a short distance. Marines qualify at 500 yards with iron sites for chrisakes. Dealey Plaza was pretty much point blank, and he had a scope. Any good Marine would have taken off three heads. Jackie was lucky Oswald was such a bad shot and basically wasted two good rounds before getting his **** together. The best I can figure is that he hadn't zeroed the scope and needed three shots to walk on to JFK's head with Kentucky windage.
Likely the cause of his bad shooting, couldn't shut up long enough to get a good shot off.

If he couldn't get a good shot off, then why was Jackie holding some brain before she went under the overpass?
Homeslice learned the weapon in three shots: whiff, two-fer neck/back, head. That's what I call a quick study.

Re: JFK Assassination "Conspiracy"
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 7:56 pm
by BlueHen86
COBBLESTONE wrote:I think Oswald acted alone as far as pulling the trigger. I do think he wanted and was willing to be the lone gunman. However, it is a fact that RFK made a ton of enemies from the mafia when he was his brother's AG. I wouldn't be too shocked if Oswald did get some backing and financing from mafia bosses. I think that is as far as it goes though.
That seems plausible.