Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

The guy's in a tizzy - doesn't know up from down! Obama and all Democrats caused the Fall of Rome, locust plagues, the rise of Hitler, the sinking of the Lusitania, crucifixion of Christ, they burned Joan d' Arc, were behind the Spanish Inquisition, and helped bring Castro to power!

Now, they are on a quest to destroy the United States of America. Dude has a short memory! It's already destroyed!



Great entertainment over lunch. Bet he and Brother Baldy are cowering together naked in a Florida bunker.

Cap'n Cat wrote:The guy's in a tizzy - doesn't know up from down! Obama and all Democrats caused the Fall of Rome, locust plagues, the rise of Hitler, the sinking of the Lusitania, crucifixion of Christ, they burned Joan d' Arc, were behind the Spanish Inquisition, and helped bring Castro to power!

Now, they are on a quest to destroy the United Staets of America. Dude has a short memory! It's already destroyed!



Great entertainment over lunch. Bet he and Brother Baldy are cowering together naked in a Florida bunker.

You can't give any credence to the ravings of a junkie.

I don't listen to him unless I forget the XM radio driving around town and that is normally only because ESPN radio is on a commercial so I'm a real short timer on his channel. I would bet his ratings will go up even higher now that the repubs need to commiserate and listen to logic as they see it. "America left" is even loonier than Limbaugh though.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I don't listen to him unless I forget the XM radio driving around town and that is normally only because ESPN radio is on a commercial so I'm a real short timer on his channel. I would bet his ratings will go up even higher now that the repubs need to commiserate and listen to logic as they see it. "America left" is even loonier than Limbaugh though.

Not by much.....both are a sad commentary on our society...

Wasn't Rush the one who (upon realizing that McCain was the Conk nominee) was grousing on and on about letting the donks win the white house to get a REAL candidate to run in 2012?

AZGrizFan wrote:Wasn't Rush the one who (upon realizing that McCain was the Conk nominee) was grousing on and on about letting the donks win the white house to get a REAL candidate to run in 2012?

Yes

dbackjon wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Wasn't Rush the one who (upon realizing that McCain was the Conk nominee) was grousing on and on about letting the donks win the white house to get a REAL candidate to run in 2012?

Yes

apparently the oxycontin has affected his memory....

AZGrizFan wrote:Wasn't Rush the one who (upon realizing that McCain was the Conk nominee) was grousing on and on about letting the donks win the white house to get a REAL candidate to run in 2012?

I listened to him almost every day for an hour the past six months and I only heard him mention that once or twice and, then, it seemed in jest. He did not like McCain running. Also, T, if you coulda heard him during the final days, he was a bitter f*ck, like many Conks on this and other boards. Obama, the Radical. Obama, the wealth confiscator. Come on.



But, Limbaugh, along with many such traditional-type Conks, is being left behind in a new and different world. It ain't 1949 in Dixon, IL, any longer. Example? Bush's war. That type of "action" doesn't work anymore.

Capitulating is not the answer, either, however, dialogue, hopefully has its own Renaissance.

The Cap'n hath spoken.
Long live Cap'n Cat.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Wasn't Rush the one who (upon realizing that McCain was the Conk nominee) was grousing on and on about letting the donks win the white house to get a REAL candidate to run in 2012?

I listened to him almost every day for an hour the past six months and I only heard him mention that once or twice and, then, it seemed in jest. He did not like McCain running. Also, T, if you coulda heard him during the final days, he was a bitter f*ck, like many Conks on this and other boards. Obama, the Radical. Obama, the wealth confiscator. Come on.



But, Limbaugh, along with many such traditional-type Conks, is being left behind in a new and different world. It ain't 1949 in Dixon, IL, any longer. Example? Bush's war. That type of "action" doesn't work anymore.

Capitulating is not the answer, either, however, dialogue, hopefully has its own Renaissance.

The Cap'n hath spoken.
Long live Cap'n Cat.

Amen, amen. What's that Dr. King said? Free at last...

Purple For Life wrote: Amen, amen. What's that Dr. King said? Free at last...

But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

That's the difference between a leader/statesman and a "poser" ideologue. Leaders build consensus, but don't steamroll over the opposing minority. The President's responsibilty is to the country first, which includes all people. And, save the "Bush...belch, brap, blech..." rhetoric. Few conservatives, myself, included consider him to have been a good President. He was elected principally due to Daddy's connections and a relatively small group of exceptionally greedy Texans. But for the Donks to even think of climbing upon a soapbox and passing judgement is vulgar and purely disingenuous. When the dust settles from this CRA mess, the Donks will have plenty of blood on their hands, and the Pelosi/Reid show is just starting...

travelinman67 wrote:

Purple For Life wrote: Amen, amen. What's that Dr. King said? Free at last...

But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

That's the difference between a leader/statesman and a "poser" ideologue. Leaders build consensus, but don't steamroll over the opposing minority. The President's responsibilty is to the country first, which includes all people. And, save the "Bush...belch, brap, blech..." rhetoric. Few conservatives, myself, included consider him to have been a good President. He was elected principally due to Daddy's connections and a relatively small group of exceptionally greedy Texans. But for the Donks to even think of climbing upon a soapbox and passing judgement is vulgar and purely disingenuous. When the dust settles from this CRA mess, the Donks will have plenty of blood on their hands, and the Pelosi/Reid show is just starting...

Bitter ConkLoser scat. Projection is your greatest (most humorous) skill, teabagsmen. Your crystal ball has a 404 Error, though.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

travelinman67 wrote: But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

That's the difference between a leader/statesman and a "poser" ideologue. Leaders build consensus, but don't steamroll over the opposing minority. The President's responsibilty is to the country first, which includes all people. And, save the "Bush...belch, brap, blech..." rhetoric. Few conservatives, myself, included consider him to have been a good President. He was elected principally due to Daddy's connections and a relatively small group of exceptionally greedy Texans. But for the Donks to even think of climbing upon a soapbox and passing judgement is vulgar and purely disingenuous. When the dust settles from this CRA mess, the Donks will have plenty of blood on their hands, and the Pelosi/Reid show is just starting...

Bitter ConkLoser scat. Projection is your greatest (most humorous) skill, teabagsmen. Your crystal ball has a 404 Error, though.

No shit. Invaribly, the exact opposite of whatever that dolt says is true. He consistent, but in a bad way.

"McCain could not have picked a better running mate" Teabagsmen69 (On AGS referring to Sarah Palin)

Blind Conk Rushgurgitating dork.

travelinman67 wrote:

Purple For Life wrote: Amen, amen. What's that Dr. King said? Free at last...

But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

Yeah, masterpiece of consensus-building we've had for the last eight years.

travelinman67 wrote:

Purple For Life wrote: Amen, amen. What's that Dr. King said? Free at last...

But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

Obviously, you do it by alienating 74% of your own country and 100% of the rest of the world. Searching for a leader from the current crop of REpublicans is about like picking out the skinniest chick at a WeightWatchers meeting......but thanks for enlightening us, we would be helpless without Conks like yourself to guide us.......

Appaholic wrote:

travelinman67 wrote: But you don't build a progressive society by telling 49% of the people they're going to go along with it "whether they like it or not".

Obviously, you do it by alienating 74% of your own country and 100% of the rest of the world. Searching for a leader from the current crop of REpublicans is about like picking out the skinniest chick at a WeightWatchers meeting......but thanks for enlightening us, we would be helpless without Conks like yourself to guide us.......

As opposed to the 84% of the country the Donk congress has alienated?

AZGrizFan wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Obviously, you do it by alienating 74% of your own country and 100% of the rest of the world. Searching for a leader from the current crop of REpublicans is about like picking out the skinniest chick at a WeightWatchers meeting......but thanks for enlightening us, we would be helpless without Conks like yourself to guide us.......

As opposed to the 84% of the country the Donk congress has alienated?

The same congress that gained donk seats? Try again.....let me re-iterate...the same donk congress with low approval rating GAINED seats while the Republican-led Executive branch got their asses handed to them....nice campaign Republicrats....

AZGrizFan wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Obviously, you do it by alienating 74% of your own country and 100% of the rest of the world. Searching for a leader from the current crop of REpublicans is about like picking out the skinniest chick at a WeightWatchers meeting......but thanks for enlightening us, we would be helpless without Conks like yourself to guide us.......

As opposed to the 84% of the country the Donk congress has alienated?

If you think the record number of filibusters alienated them this session, just wait.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Appaholic wrote: Obviously, you do it by alienating 74% of your own country and 100% of the rest of the world. Searching for a leader from the current crop of REpublicans is about like picking out the skinniest chick at a WeightWatchers meeting......but thanks for enlightening us, we would be helpless without Conks like yourself to guide us.......

As opposed to the 84% of the country the Donk congress has alienated?

Repugnicants have been alienating women, minorities and the poor for decades. Your party is a world wide embarrassment and has finally been exposed as the party of hatred, division, racism, suffering, stupidity and violence. Change or get the F out.

D1B wrote:Repugnicants have been alienating women, minorities and the poor for decades. Your party is a world wide embarrassment and has finally been exposed as the party of hatred, division, racism, suffering, stupidity and violence. Change or get the F out.

looks like the party of "hatred, division, racism, suffering, stupidity and violence" isn't quite dead yet.

Nice find Z. I didn't notice the date at first.

I'm sure the brothers and Hound will have some great excuse for what happened yesterday.

D1B wrote: ...The Republican Party, which was founded in opposition to Democrat slavery, has been promoting and electing intelligent women, minorities and the poor for decades. It is the only party to successfully quell (as opposed to providing mere lip service against) hatred, division, racism, suffering, stupidity and violence. Embrace it or get the F out.

FIFY, D!

T-mans post (way up there) is actually interesting - in part I agree with it...
I think we get sold a bill-of-goods far too often in our political system and indeed Obama was just that - a laundry list of "coulda shoulda woulda" is about all we're going to be left with after he leaves (based on his last two years)

I do not - however - buy into the whole "he's destroying the country nonsense... He has in fact been a flash point igniting Health care issues that nobody would do anything about - ultimately - he did something which even if it's the wrong thing at least he got that ball rolling... of course it will all be dismantled over the next three years but...

We do need a leader who actually listens (unlike the last two presidents) and who gathers both sides together

Cap'n lives in the Polka-belt of Minnesota, it's either Rush or Polka music, and he chooses Rush