Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

No, not the bush betwix a womans legs, but former President George W. Bush.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/1 ... urn false;

He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.

Does that still make him a right Wing radical? D1b, your thoughts?

Ibanez wrote:No, not the bush betwix a womans legs, but former President George W. Bush.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/1 ... urn false;

He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.

Does that still make him a right Wing radical? D1b, your thoughts?

Any real conservative worth their salt was a Bush hater.

Ibanez = Ralph Jr.

kalm wrote:

Ibanez wrote:No, not the bush betwix a womans legs, but former President George W. Bush.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/1 ... urn false;


Does that still make him a right Wing radical? D1b, your thoughts?

Any real conservative worth their salt was a Bush hater.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
Any real conservative worth their salt was a Bush hater.

It's true. You're one of em. MOF, you were one of the first to jump shit when gas prices skyrocketed and the economy went tits up during Bush's second term.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:

It's true. You're one of em. MOF, you were one of the first to jump shit when gas prices skyrocketed and the economy went tits up during Bush's second term.

And yet, if it had been Bush against Obama for a third term, I'd have voted Bush again.

AZGrizFan wrote:

D1B wrote:
It's true. You're one of em. MOF, you were one of the first to jump shit when gas prices skyrocketed and the economy went tits up during Bush's second term.

And yet, if it had been Bush against Obama for a third term, I'd have voted Bush again.

Obama saved the economy and has done more positive things for america than Bush did in 8 years.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
Any real conservative worth their salt was a Bush hater.

I said "worth their salt". You're a closeted hippie.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And yet, if it had been Bush against Obama for a third term, I'd have voted Bush again.

Obama saved the economy and has done more positive things for america than Bush did in 8 years.

What color is the sky in your world?

D1B wrote:Ibanez = Ralph Jr.

I'm not a drug addicted, socially inept, closeminded left wing radical. You, on the other hand, are a left wing, close minded, intolerant menace that is more equivalent to Ralph than I.


I always say it, but how come those that preach tolerance and respect of others are more times than not contrary in thier own behavior and actions?

Ibanez wrote:

D1B wrote:Ibanez = Ralph Jr.

I'm not a drug addicted, socially inept, closeminded left wing radical. You, on the other hand, are a left wing, close minded, intolerant menace that is more equivalent to Ralph than I.

DB and Ralph are from the same cloth.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And yet, if it had been Bush against Obama for a third term, I'd have voted Bush again.

Obama saved the economy and has done more positive things for america than Bush did in 8 years.

Just not true. Obama did not save the economy. He used taxpayer money to reward his voting blocks.

While the results of recent "stimulus" spending are legitimately debatable, if any government action made a positive difference it was Bush's initial emergency response, not Obama's subsequent porkulus.

Obama has made the country far worse than it was before and is more polarizing and divisive than any other politician in modern history.

Ibanez wrote:

D1B wrote:Ibanez = Ralph Jr.

I'm not a drug addicted, socially inept, close minded left wing radical. You, on the other hand, are a left wing, close minded, intolerant menace that is more equivalent to Ralph than I.

I always say it, but how come those that preach tolerance and respect of others are more times than not contrary in their own behavior and actions?

Not to mention the dismal brothers' weird, Ralph-like obsession with China.

Why does this shit matter? The guy is nuts, who really cares about his political leanings? The press needs to let it go, the dems need to let it go and the reps need to let it go.

We should focus on the important stuff - like trying to keep guns out of the hands of wackjobs. We should stop bickering over stupid stuff like this. Next week we'll find out Laughner's favorite color is red, I guess that makes him a conk.

BlueHen86 wrote:Why does this **** matter? The guy is nuts, who really cares about his political leanings? The press needs to let it go, the dems need to let it go and the reps need to let it go.

We should focus on the important stuff - like trying to keep guns out of the hands of wackjobs. We should stop bickering over stupid stuff like this. Next week we'll find out Laughner's favorite color is red, I guess that makes him a conk.

Don't even try to bring Roos Field into this.

89Hen wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
I'm not a drug addicted, socially inept, closeminded left wing radical. You, on the other hand, are a left wing, close minded, intolerant menace that is more equivalent to Ralph than I.

DB and Ralph are from the same cloth.

Funny, this coming from one of his henchmen.

*FACT - 89Hen was on the board of directors of AGS and helped lead the effort to ban almost everyone that matters on this board.

89Hen worked for Ralph

native wrote:

D1B wrote:
Obama saved the economy and has done more positive things for america than Bush did in 8 years.

Just not true. Obama did not save the economy. He used taxpayer money to reward his voting blocks.

While the results of recent "stimulus" spending are legitimately debatable, if any government action made a positive difference it was Bush's initial emergency response, not Obama's subsequent porkulus.

Obama has made the country far worse than it was before and is more polarizing and divisive than any other politician in modern history.

Naive, what qualifies you to make such an opinion? Was watching C-SPAN a few weeks ago and they interviewed the buisness leaders Obama invited to the economic "summit" of sorts. They invaribly credited Obama's stimulus as saving the economy. While hard, as most remedies are, the next steps are already in place for further recovery.

Sorry, buy I'll take the word of the CEO of FED EX before you any day.

God bless Obama.

BlueHen86 wrote:Why does this shit matter? The guy is nuts, who really cares about his political leanings? The press needs to let it go, the dems need to let it go and the reps need to let it go.

We should focus on the important stuff - like trying to keep guns out of the hands of wackjobs. We should stop bickering over stupid stuff like this. Next week we'll find out Laughner's favorite color is red, I guess that makes him a conk.

It matters because the it's part of the conservative right's strategy to resist harmony and cooperation. They thrive on discontent, hatred and racism - it's the only way they can get elected. They're fascists.

D1B wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:Why does this shit matter? The guy is nuts, who really cares about his political leanings? The press needs to let it go, the dems need to let it go and the reps need to let it go.

We should focus on the important stuff - like trying to keep guns out of the hands of wackjobs. We should stop bickering over stupid stuff like this. Next week we'll find out Laughner's favorite color is red, I guess that makes him a conk.

It matters because the it's part of the conservative right's strategy to resist harmony and cooperation. They thrive on discontent, hatred and racism - it's the only way they can get elected. They're fascists.

I'm not too sure about that. At least it seems equal on one side vs. the other. The first bullets on this one were being fired from the liberal camp so whatever this turns out to be the libs that laid this out are accountable for doing so.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And yet, if it had been Bush against Obama for a third term, I'd have voted Bush again.

Obama saved the economy and has done more positive things for america than Bush did in 8 years.

D1B wrote:

native wrote:
Just not true. Obama did not save the economy. He used taxpayer money to reward his voting blocks.

While the results of recent "stimulus" spending are legitimately debatable, if any government action made a positive difference it was Bush's initial emergency response, not Obama's subsequent porkulus.

Obama has made the country far worse than it was before and is more polarizing and divisive than any other politician in modern history.

Naive, what qualifies you to make such an opinion? Was watching C-SPAN a few weeks ago and they interviewed the buisness leaders Obama invited to the economic "summit" of sorts. They invaribly credited Obama's stimulus as saving the economy. While hard, as most remedies are, the next steps are already in place for further recovery.

Sorry, buy I'll take the word of the CEO of FED EX before you any day.

God bless Obama.

Baloney.

The cream of the jest is that without massive government intervention our so-called "free market" system would today rest on the ash heap of history right next to the Soviet collectivist system that it managed to outlast on its own by a whopping twenty years.

houndawg wrote:The cream of the jest is that without massive government intervention our so-called "free market" system would today rest on the ash heap of history right next to the Soviet collectivist system that it managed to outlast on its own by a whopping twenty years.

Whats funny is all you donks that believe this baloney...

houndawg wrote:The cream of the jest is that without massive government intervention our so-called "free market" system would today rest on the ash heap of history right next to the Soviet collectivist system that it managed to outlast on its own by a whopping twenty years.

Whaaaaaat? Sure, there would be a down turn...there always is. But there also would have been a recovery with or without government intervention. And one could easily argue that is was the government interventions that helped cripple the economy in the first place.

While I am on a horse, most of the liberals say you need the government to control the big money people. Funny stuff right there. It is the big money folks that use the government to control the masses.

D1B wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:Why does this **** matter? The guy is nuts, who really cares about his political leanings? The press needs to let it go, the dems need to let it go and the reps need to let it go.

We should focus on the important stuff - like trying to keep guns out of the hands of wackjobs. We should stop bickering over stupid stuff like this. Next week we'll find out Laughner's favorite color is red, I guess that makes him a conk.

It matters because the it's part of the conservative right's strategy to resist harmony and cooperation. They thrive on discontent, hatred and racism - it's the only way they can get elected. They're fascists.

"Harmony and cooperation?" Is that what you tell all your rape victims?