Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Speech to be presented after the State Of The Union address by Michelle Bachmann.

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.co ... to-del.php

This ought to be really good..

Bachmann actually makes Palin look good.

It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.

Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.

Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

Bullshit. Palin, the poster child for your argument above, is a fucking lunatic profiteer.

Last I heard, business is clamoring for infrastructure investment.

blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.

Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

I find it tough to like strong, successful, liberal women too. I'm an equal opportunity misogynist.

Oh...and Bachmann is a stupid whore.

If she were a liberal the honks would be bitching about how she need a strong pimp hand.....

Still wondering if MB is fronting for Palin, or attempting to steal her thunder... not sure which...

blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.

Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.

Grizalltheway wrote:

blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.

Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.

blueballs gets schooled again by GATW

dbackjon wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.

blueballs gets schooled again by GATW

Hillary Clinton is a conservative? Hmmm, didn't know that.

89

Grizalltheway wrote:89

dbackjon wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.

blueballs gets schooled again by GATW

Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?

Grizalltheway wrote:89

blueballs wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
blueballs gets schooled again by GATW

Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

D1B wrote:

blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Bingo.

D1B wrote:

blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some **** crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every **** liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Won't happen on the honk side, the lunatic fringe controlling the party screens out moderates in the primary.

D1B wrote:I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Bullshit.

D1B wrote:

blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.
The spin cycle is outta control today.

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.
The spin cycle is outta control today.

What does this have to do with my statement? Try to stay on topic Baldy.

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:

It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some **** crazy, to carry the torch.

I think I speak for every **** liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.
The spin cycle is outta control today.

Sorry, Moldy, independent since 1972.

89Hen wrote:

D1B wrote:I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Bullshit.

You'd like it to be Hen, but unlike you and the other automatons here with their fists up Ayn Rands aynus, we're not willing to give up our freedoms, civil rights and natural environment for a suit who just want's to gut goverment to save everyone a nickel.

You'd support Hitler if he was pro-choice.

D1B wrote:

Baldy wrote: But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.
The spin cycle is outta control today.

What does this have to do with my statement? Try to stay on topic Baldy.

D1B wrote:I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Oh, you know as good as I that my comment was very much on topic.

But it's good to see you didn't disagree with what I said.

houndawg wrote:

Baldy wrote: But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.
The spin cycle is outta control today.

Sorry, Moldy, independent since 1972.

So is Bernie Sanders, old man.

Maybe she's running for President since Obama did the same thing in '08
worked for him.

---

In 2008, Sen. Obama offered his own response to Bush's State of the Union

Los Angeles Times ^ | 1/25/11 | Michael A. Memoli

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...