Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://finance.yahoo.com/family-home/ar ... cities-247" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


1. Flint, Mich.
2. Detroit
3. St. Louis
4. New Haven, Conn.
5. Memphis, Tenn.
6. Oakland, Calif.
7. Little Rock, Ark.
8. Baltimore
9. Rockford, Ill.
10. Stockton, Calif.

Not sure if I want to come visit you fools now. Bunch of violent thugs over there. Pretty sure at least one of you will want to murder me.

Just a guess, 9 of the 10 have Donk mayors.

It's simple, there are two Baltimores. The nice areas that are relatively safe, Inner Harbor, Harbor East, Federal Hill, Fells Point and Canton. And the insanely dangerous rest of the city. Stick to the safe places and your fine, mostly. You might as well be living in a Zombie Apocalypse movie in the really bad parts of town. Fools getting into shoot outs in broad day light. For no reason. 78 murders and it's just getting hot out.

Also, Baltimore County enforces the death penalty, the City doesn't use it. MoFo's stay inside the City to do their killing, outside the city is safe.

andy7171 wrote:It's simple, there are two Baltimores. The nice areas that are relatively safe, Inner Harbor, Harbor East, Federal Hill, Fells Point and Canton. And the insanely dangerous rest of the city. Stick to the safe places and your fine, mostly. You might as well be living in a Zombie Apocalypse movie in the really bad parts of town. Fools getting into shoot outs in broad day light. For no reason. 78 murders and it's just getting hot out.

Also, Baltimore County enforces the death penalty, the City doesn't use it. MoFo's stay inside the City to do their killing, outside the city is safe.

Doesn't that description apply to just about every large city?

Baldy wrote:Just a guess, 9 of the 10 have Donk mayors.

I believe it might be 10 of 10.

AZGrizFan wrote:

andy7171 wrote:It's simple, there are two Baltimores. The nice areas that are relatively safe, Inner Harbor, Harbor East, Federal Hill, Fells Point and Canton. And the insanely dangerous rest of the city. Stick to the safe places and your fine, mostly. You might as well be living in a Zombie Apocalypse movie in the really bad parts of town. Fools getting into shoot outs in broad day light. For no reason. 78 murders and it's just getting hot out.

Also, Baltimore County enforces the death penalty, the City doesn't use it. MoFo's stay inside the City to do their killing, outside the city is safe.

Doesn't that description apply to just about every large city?

Pretty much, but there are some areas of Baltimore where it's dangerous to just drive your car mid day.

andy7171 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Doesn't that description apply to just about every large city?

Pretty much, but there are some areas of Baltimore where it's dangerous to just drive your car mid day.

Same in Phoenix. South Central between 24th Street and 42nd Ave, south of Buckeye Road....

Funny, none of the world's most livable cities are conservative strongholds, like one would expect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_mo ... ble_Cities" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Grizalltheway wrote:Funny, none of the world's most livable cities are conservative strongholds, like one would expect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_mo ... ble_Cities" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Important criteria in this non-scientific survey[citation needed] are safety/crime, international connectivity, climate/sunshine, quality of architecture, public transportation, tolerance, environmental issues and access to nature, urban design, business conditions, pro active policy developments and medical care

And? Looks like safety/crime were first on the list of criteria.

Grizalltheway wrote:And? Looks like safety/crime were first on the list of criteria.

And? Looks like not a single one of those cities is in AMERICA. You know, that country YOU live in???

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:And? Looks like safety/crime were first on the list of criteria.

And? Looks like not a single one of those cities is in AMERICA. You know, that country YOU live in???

So, it looks as though these generally more liberal countries do a better job of making their cities safe, clean, and pleasant places to live. Try to keep up, Z.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:And? Looks like safety/crime were first on the list of criteria.

And? Looks like not a single one of those cities is in AMERICA. You know, that country YOU live in???

Grizalltheway wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And? Looks like not a single one of those cities is in AMERICA. You know, that country YOU live in???

So, it looks as though these generally more liberal countries do a better job of making their cities safe, clean, and pleasant places to live. Try to keep up, Z.

Well of COURSE they are. They ALL have AMERICA doing their dirty work for them. It's easy to be safe, clean and pleasant when you don't have to spend a fucking dime on national defense.

Maybe we can get Canada or Australia to start defending us and we can take the $750 billion we spend on the world's defense and start putting it to good use, huh?

AZGrizFan wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Pretty much, but there are some areas of Baltimore where it's dangerous to just drive your car mid day.

Same in Phoenix. South Central between 24th Street and 42nd Ave, south of Buckeye Road....

I got beat up pretty good down there just because I was white.


Love Buckeye, AZ

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Same in Phoenix. South Central between 24th Street and 42nd Ave, south of Buckeye Road....

I got beat up pretty good down there just because I was white.


Love Buckeye, AZ

I thought you were black?

I am..............on the internet.

grizzaholic wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

I got beat up pretty good down there just because I was white.


Love Buckeye, AZ

I thought you were black?

Internet Black

andy7171 wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:
I thought you were black?

Internet Black

Alpha just posted that.

grizzaholic wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Internet Black

Alpha just posted that.

GHolic just posted that........

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:
Alpha just posted that.

GHolic just posted that........

And Andy failed again.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
So, it looks as though these generally more liberal countries do a better job of making their cities safe, clean, and pleasant places to live. Try to keep up, Z.

Well of COURSE they are. They ALL have AMERICA doing their dirty work for them. It's easy to be safe, clean and pleasant when you don't have to spend a fucking dime on national defense.

Maybe we can get Canada or Australia to start defending us and we can take the $750 billion we spend on the world's defense and start putting it to good use, huh?

Yeah, genius, a ~3% difference in national defense spending (as a percentage of GDP) is what's making all of the difference here. Not to mention the fact that WE'RE the ones who started two wars that we can't seem to end, and into which we pour billions every year.

But yeah, keep using that red herring argument. It's never failed to fail, even after all these years.

Grizalltheway wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Well of COURSE they are. They ALL have AMERICA doing their dirty work for them. It's easy to be safe, clean and pleasant when you don't have to spend a fucking dime on national defense.

Maybe we can get Canada or Australia to start defending us and we can take the $750 billion we spend on the world's defense and start putting it to good use, huh?

Yeah, genius, a ~3% difference in national defense spending (as a percentage of GDP) is what's making all of the difference here. Not to mention the fact that WE'RE the ones who started two wars that we can't seem to end, and into which we pour billions every year.

But yeah, keep using that red herring argument. It's never failed to fail, even after all these years.

OK, so now you're admitting not only do they not DEFEND themselves, they don't PRODUCE anything either...thats ALSO done by America. Basically Australia and Canada are the 51st and 52nd states.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Yeah, genius, a ~3% difference in national defense spending (as a percentage of GDP) is what's making all of the difference here. Not to mention the fact that WE'RE the ones who started two wars that we can't seem to end, and into which we pour billions every year.

But yeah, keep using that red herring argument. It's never failed to fail, even after all these years.

OK, so now you're admitting not only do they not DEFEND themselves, they don't PRODUCE anything either...thats ALSO done by America. Basically Australia and Canada are the 51st and 52nd states.

Uhh..they don't?