Page 1 of 1

How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:46 pm
by AZGrizFan
A parable:

A Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (Ford Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the American team had 7 people steering and 2 people rowing.

Feeling a deeper study was in order, American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.

Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 2 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 2 people rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First Program,' with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rowers. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses. The pension program was trimmed to 'equal the competition' and some of the resultant savings were channeled into morale-boosting programs and teamwork posters.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off one rower, halted development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses.

The next year, try as he might, the lone designated rower was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles,) so he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe equipment was sold and the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India .

Sadly, the End.

Here's something else to think about: Ford has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the US, claiming they can't make money paying American wages.

TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a dozen plants inside the US . The last quarter's results:

TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits while Ford racked up 9 billion in losses (not sure what quarter this is, but it's surely representative).

Ford folks are still scratching their heads, and collecting bonuses...

IF THIS WEREN'T SO TRUE IT MIGHT BE FUNNY



Yep....let's give em ALL billions of dollars. :shock: :roll: :roll:

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:08 pm
by dbackjon
So true.

And I am impressed - not one bit of blame on the union...

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:53 pm
by AZGrizFan
dbackjon wrote:So true.

And I am impressed - not one bit of blame on the union...
That's because I didn't write it. :D

I got it in a chain email from skjellyfetti. :shock:

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:58 pm
by dbackjon
At least you didn't edit it to do so...lol

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:03 pm
by AZGrizFan
dbackjon wrote:At least you didn't edit it to do so...lol
I think the unions showed their true colors the other day when they refused to take a pay cut. They'd cut their noses off to spite their faces. Talk about not understanding economics.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:57 am
by AshevilleApp
AZGrizFan wrote:A parable:

A Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (Ford Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the American team had 7 people steering and 2 people rowing.

Feeling a deeper study was in order, American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.

Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 2 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 2 people rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First Program,' with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rowers. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses. The pension program was trimmed to 'equal the competition' and some of the resultant savings were channeled into morale-boosting programs and teamwork posters.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off one rower, halted development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses.

The next year, try as he might, the lone designated rower was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles,) so he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe equipment was sold and the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India .

Sadly, the End.

Here's something else to think about: Ford has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the US, claiming they can't make money paying American wages.

TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a dozen plants inside the US . The last quarter's results:

TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits while Ford racked up 9 billion in losses (not sure what quarter this is, but it's surely representative).

Ford folks are still scratching their heads, and collecting bonuses...

IF THIS WEREN'T SO TRUE IT MIGHT BE FUNNY



Yep....let's give em ALL billions of dollars. :shock: :roll: :roll:

A lot of truth there. Of course Toyota posted losses for this past quarter as well.

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:05 am
by houndawg
AZGrizFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:At least you didn't edit it to do so...lol
I think the unions showed their true colors the other day when they refused to take a pay cut. They'd cut their noses off to spite their faces. Talk about not understanding economics.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
They took a cut when Iacoca turned Chrysler around. Of course Iacocca was smart enough to cut exec pay first.

People are looking at this thing the wrong way; American workers are the planet's most productive, if we want the US auto industry to be successful we need to replace management, not unions. If we downsize salaried workers and replace them with Japanese managers who deliver better performance for less pay we'll be right back in the game. If we were really smart we'd send American managers to China and let them screw up someone else's economy.

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:59 am
by AZGrizFan
houndawg wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: I think the unions showed their true colors the other day when they refused to take a pay cut. They'd cut their noses off to spite their faces. Talk about not understanding economics.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
They took a cut when Iacoca turned Chrysler around. Of course Iacocca was smart enough to cut exec pay first.

People are looking at this thing the wrong way; American workers are the planet's most productive, if we want the US auto industry to be successful we need to replace management, not unions. If we downsize salaried workers and replace them with Japanese managers who deliver better performance for less pay we'll be right back in the game. If we were really smart we'd send American managers to China and let them screw up someone else's economy.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Ralph is our first plant. :D

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:36 am
by Col Hogan
AZGrizFan wrote:
houndawg wrote: They took a cut when Iacoca turned Chrysler around. Of course Iacocca was smart enough to cut exec pay first.

People are looking at this thing the wrong way; American workers are the planet's most productive, if we want the US auto industry to be successful we need to replace management, not unions. If we downsize salaried workers and replace them with Japanese managers who deliver better performance for less pay we'll be right back in the game. If we were really smart we'd send American managers to China and let them screw up someone else's economy.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Ralph is our first plant. :D
Image

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:54 am
by Gil Dobie
The auto industry should hire Bernard Madoff to raise funds for their bailout. :roll:

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:24 am
by Ibanez
It's already been said. The unions and management have brought this industry to it's knee's. To beat your competition, you have to watch what they do and act accordingly, not ignore like the Big 3 have.

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:16 pm
by slycat
Very true. Great post AZ.

Re: How an Auto Bailout Would Be Spent

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:37 pm
by AZGrizFan
Gil Dobie wrote:The auto industry should hire Bernard Madoff to raise funds for their bailout. :roll:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah, he could raise $50 billion in a heartbeat! :lol: