Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

And now he's made a total mockery of the Court's naïve belief that super PACs would remain separate from individual campaigns, by officially endorsing his own super PAC and allowing campaign manager Jim Messina and even cabinet officers to speak at his super PAC events. Obama will not appear at such events but he, Michelle Obama, and Vice President Joe Biden will encourage support of the Obama super PAC.

One Obama adviser says Obama's decision to openly endorse his super PAC has had an immediate effect. "Our donors get it," the official said, adding that they now want to "go fight the other side."

Exactly. So now a relative handful of super-rich Democrats want to fight a relative handful of super-rich Republicans. And we call this a democracy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-re ... 62386.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obama's just another pol. That's one thing kalm and I agree on...I think.

Ivytalk wrote:Obama's just another pol. That's one thing kalm and I agree on...I think.

Of course! But we actually agree on many things

The Holy Grail is the greatest movie of all time
Douchebag makes for an outstanding insult
That one blond chick on Fox News is hot
Flyfishing is the sport of kings
Eastern Washington University is the Harvard of the Palouse

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Obama's just another pol. That's one thing kalm and I agree on...I think.

Of course! But we actually agree on many things

The Holy Grail is the greatest movie of all time
Douchebag makes for an outstanding insult
That one blond chick on Fox News is hot
Flyfishing is the sport of kings
Eastern Washington University is the Harvard of the Palouse

Yes as to all ( Fox has more than one hot blonde chick, but I assume you mean Megyn Kelly). Now how do we start a political party out of that? Anarcho-Syndicalist Douchebags for a Better America>? And a Super PAC?

Uh, I call a violation on this thread - Citizens United did not alter what individuals could or couldn't contribute in terms of money to groups like Super PACs that aren't officially connected to any particular campaign. Since Buckley v. Valeo in 1976, individuals have been able to spend whatever amount of money they want, even in cooperation with other individuals, to advocate whatever position or candidate they like, as long as they are independent of an official campaign or candidate. Citizens United in no way changed or altered that. Really rich Democrats and really rich Republicans have been spending really large amounts of money in every election trying to outduel each other. That's what we call status quo and have called it that for 200+ years. And yes, we've called it Democracy that long as well.

GannonFan wrote:Uh, I call a violation on this thread - Citizens United did not alter what individuals could or couldn't contribute in terms of money to groups like Super PACs that aren't officially connected to any particular campaign. Since Buckley v. Valeo in 1976, individuals have been able to spend whatever amount of money they want, even in cooperation with other individuals, to advocate whatever position or candidate they like, as long as they are independent of an official campaign or candidate. Citizens United in no way changed or altered that. Really rich Democrats and really rich Republicans have been spending really large amounts of money in every election trying to outduel each other. That's what we call status quo and have called it that for 200+ years. And yes, we've called it Democracy that long as well.

Leave it to Ganny to create rational buzzkill on what could have been a fun thread.

You guys are crazy. The hottest girl on FoxNews is a brunette...

Andy is truly a dream guy for every slightly pudgy chick in the world. I think he could actually be elected president.

Eat one OB!

andy7171 wrote:You guys are crazy. The hottest girl on FoxNews is a brunette...

Mediocre at best and when it comes to brunettes she doesn't hold a candle to



I'm starting to mistrust your judgement Andy.

kalm wrote:

I'm starting to mistrust your judgement Andy.

Her eyes are too close together. Almost Cycloptic.

andy7171 wrote:

kalm wrote:

I'm starting to mistrust your judgement Andy.

Her eyes are too close together. Almost Cycloptic.

kalm wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Her eyes are too close together. Almost Cycloptic.

MSNBC's Savannah Guthrie ftw

(eyes spread apart enough ya picky somuvabitch?)

kalm wrote:MSNBC's Savannah Guthrie ftw

(eyes spread apart enough ya picky somuvabitch?)

Too manly in the face. She looks like one of these guys...




(D1B in the background)

andy7171 wrote:

Is that a man wearing a dress?

Andy, don't you have vision coverage?

Erin, did you hear what Shrek said? Hit him!!!!!

Cluck U wrote:

andy7171 wrote:

Is that a man wearing a dress?

Andy, don't you have vision coverage?

You guys are all crazy.