Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Just asking....

dbackjon wrote:Just asking....

The answers will be the same as the opposite thread.

Yes.

As long as they are small government, less spending, and don't prefer the government meddling--absolutely.

Appaholic wrote:Yes.

Republican holy alliance with conservative christians is now beginning to work against them. They were able to parlay abortion and hatred against gays into election wins. Not no more. They were exposed as slight of hand shycksters who distracted people with non issues and when they weren't looking, gave away our entire national wealth to investment bankers, the defense industry and Iraq.

I would and have voted republican.

dbackjon wrote:Just asking....

In fact I PREFER pro-choice republicans. Proves they aren't tied to the "party" line.

AZGrizFan wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Just asking....

In fact I PREFER pro-choice republicans. Proves they aren't tied to the "party" line.

Good point..

Yes. Prefer them to the "wrapped in the pages of the bible" variety.

Social issues still being obsessed over by Republicans in state legislatures-

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... yoming.txt

Wedgebuster wrote:Social issues still being obsessed over by Republicans in state legislatures-

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... yoming.txt

CHEYENNE - Committees of the Wyoming House of Representatives plan to consider bills on the polarizing social issues of abortion and same-sex marriage this week.

One of the House bills would let Wyoming voters consider whether to amend the Wyoming Constitution to specify that the state wouldn't recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. House Speaker Colin Simpson, R-Cody, said the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear the bill Tuesday.

Simpson said the House Labor, Health and Social Services Committee will consider two bills Wednesday that would impose additional requirements on people performing or receiving abortions in the state.

"I've just asked the chairmen to give them a fair hearing, and if they come out on the floor, we'll certainly debate them here," Simpson said of the bills.

Matthew Shepard - has Wyoming learned nothing?

dbackjon wrote:Matthew Shepard - has Wyoming learned nothing?

Their elevator does't go all the way to the top, Jon.

No, I would not support a 100% pro-choice Republican.
But I would support a Republican in favor of gay-marriage

ATrain wrote:No, I would not support a 100% pro-choice Republican.
But I would support a Republican in favor of gay-marriage

Everybody's got their "issue", right?

AZGrizFan wrote:

ATrain wrote:No, I would not support a 100% pro-choice Republican.
But I would support a Republican in favor of gay-marriage

Everybody's got their "issue", right?

Yep

I already voted for McCain, while holding my nose. It won't happen again you can rest assured.

catamount man wrote:I already voted for McCain, while holding my nose. It won't happen again you can rest assured.

Sell out. I thought you were voting for Barr.

bobbythekidd wrote:

catamount man wrote:I already voted for McCain, while holding my nose. It won't happen again you can rest assured.

Sell out. I thought you were voting for Barr.

Yeah....no sh!t....a true display of rock-solid conviction.... ....that'll show the two parties....talk about a wasted vote....

dbackjon wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:Social issues still being obsessed over by Republicans in state legislatures-

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... yoming.txt

CHEYENNE - Committees of the Wyoming House of Representatives plan to consider bills on the polarizing social issues of abortion and same-sex marriage this week.

One of the House bills would let Wyoming voters consider whether to amend the Wyoming Constitution to specify that the state wouldn't recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. House Speaker Colin Simpson, R-Cody, said the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear the bill Tuesday.

Simpson said the House Labor, Health and Social Services Committee will consider two bills Wednesday that would impose additional requirements on people performing or receiving abortions in the state.

"I've just asked the chairmen to give them a fair hearing, and if they come out on the floor, we'll certainly debate them here," Simpson said of the bills.

They should bear in mind that it will be just as easy for other states to amend thier Constitutions to not recognize sheep as legitimate spouses.

catamount man wrote:I already voted for McCain, while holding my nose. It won't happen again you can rest assured.

Well, I kept to my convictions. Glad I didn't vote for Señor McCain. That is definitely a wasted vote--especially when you rail against the two parties.

Yeah I know I suck. Why don't you just drive down to South Carolina and fucking put me out of my goddamn misery right now??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

catamount man wrote:Yeah I know I suck. Why don't you just drive down to South Carolina and f**k[*] put me out of my goddamn misery right now??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nah, you're free to think how you want Rich. You're my boy...just getting at you a bit. It's all good.

dbackjon wrote:Just asking....

The abortion issue has no weight on my vote