SWEET! $13 EXTRA A MONTH!
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:41 pm
HELL TO THE YEA!!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT FOR MY EXTRA $7.50 A PAYCHECK!!!!!!!!

FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=3802
Some stimulus!MarkCCU wrote:HELL TO THE YEA!!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT FOR MY EXTRA $7.50 A PAYCHECK!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That started a long time ago and was brought to fruition with your boy Bush. He was the biggest Socialist president we have had since FDR.catamount man wrote:f**k[*] welfare recipients are getting more for doing f**k[*] nothing. You cannot deny it, WE ARE NOW A f**k[*] SOCIALIST NATION. Good job barry!
Eight years of Bush-brand socialism pushed us to the edge...ASUMountaineer wrote:That started a long time ago and was brought to fruition with your boy Bush. He was the biggest Socialist president we have had since FDR.catamount man wrote:f**k[*] welfare recipients are getting more for doing f**k[*] nothing. You cannot deny it, WE ARE NOW A f**k[*] SOCIALIST NATION. Good job barry!
Citdog after that was posted.Col Hogan wrote:another revolution might be in order...

Who is going to lead it? You gonna risk everything to do so?Col Hogan wrote:ASUMountaineer wrote:
That started a long time ago and was brought to fruition with your boy Bush. He was the biggest Socialist president we have had since FDR.
We need to start all over again...another revolution might be in order...
Well, as my high school english teacher was so fond of saying...dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it? You gonna risk everything to do so?Col Hogan wrote:
We need to start all over again...another revolution might be in order...
I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it?
I'll pass on him, thanks.bobbythekidd wrote:I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it?
I expect you would be on the other side anyway.dbackjon wrote:I'll pass on him, thanks.bobbythekidd wrote: I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.
We need to find a Paul disciple with the charisma and speaking abilities of Obama...bobbythekidd wrote:I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it?
The right sidebobbythekidd wrote:I expect you would be on the other side anyway.dbackjon wrote: I'll pass on him, thanks.
There is a reason he was really never a serious candidate...bobbythekidd wrote:I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it?
dbackjon wrote:The right sidebobbythekidd wrote: I expect you would be on the other side anyway.
You're right, it's called the MSM. They like government subsidies and news stories to keep their business going. They don't want someone who wants personal freedom above all, that would hurt their bottom lines, but of course, they're not really a fan of "Capitalism." What a crock of sh!t.clenz wrote:There is a reason he was really never a serious candidate...bobbythekidd wrote: I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.
Yeah, personal freedom would be such a bad thing for those seeking "equality." SMH.dbackjon wrote:I'll pass on him, thanks.bobbythekidd wrote: I nominate Dr. Ron Paul.
If/ when it was possible to get up enough people for a revolt (not necessarily militarily) aboslutely I'll lead it. Why not? I'm not rich so I don't have much to lose. If I lost everything and we lost the revolt, then I could just be a good sheep and live in your utopian society of mooching off the government.dbackjon wrote:Who is going to lead it? You gonna risk everything to do so?Col Hogan wrote:
We need to start all over again...another revolution might be in order...
You are deluding yourself if you just think MSM didn't consider Dr. Paul a serious candidate. The whole Republican Party establishment denegrated him as well - from Limbaugh/Hannity, to the booing at the debates all across the country.ASUMountaineer wrote:You're right, it's called the MSM. They like government subsidies and news stories to keep their business going. They don't want someone who wants personal freedom above all, that would hurt their bottom lines, but of course, they're not really a fan of "Capitalism." What a crock of sh!t.clenz wrote:There is a reason he was really never a serious candidate...
See, I don't think things are as bad as you. We need changes, yes. We need to reclaim the country from the financial elitists. But all in all, things are good in this country. Especially if you are heterosexual.ASUMountaineer wrote:If/ when it was possible to get up enough people for a revolt (not necessarily militarily) aboslutely I'll lead it. Why not? I'm not rich so I don't have much to lose. If I lost everything and we lost the revolt, then I could just be a good sheep and live in your utopian society of mooching off the government.dbackjon wrote:
Who is going to lead it? You gonna risk everything to do so?
Why? Ron Paul is against Gay Adoption and Gay Marriage. He is against Gays in the military. He thinks that sodomy should be illegal.ASUMountaineer wrote:Yeah, personal freedom would be such a bad thing for those seeking "equality." SMH.dbackjon wrote: I'll pass on him, thanks.
Right On! (but boy are you gonna be pissed when you find out it's only $6.50 per paycheck)MarkCCU wrote:HELL TO THE YEA!!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT FOR MY EXTRA $7.50 A PAYCHECK!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I listened to several of the debates, and if I heard any booing towards Paul, it was partially masked by cheers. Take a look at this clip. 1:18-1:40 is IMO the best soundbyte by any wannabe candidate of any party during the entire 2008 election season. He got cheers for saying it and you can't hear any boos.dbackjon wrote:You are deluding yourself if you just think MSM didn't consider Dr. Paul a serious candidate. The whole Republican Party establishment denegrated him as well - from Limbaugh/Hannity, to the booing at the debates all across the country.ASUMountaineer wrote:
You're right, it's called the MSM. They like government subsidies and news stories to keep their business going. They don't want someone who wants personal freedom above all, that would hurt their bottom lines, but of course, they're not really a fan of "Capitalism." What a crock of sh!t.