Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

kalm wrote:Campaign finance driven crony capitalism...

But wait...as Ganny and Chizzy suggest, it doesn't really matter and they're wasting their time and resources.


It's all understandable coming from donk states and governors who hate capitalism, but conks should stick to their "free market" guns.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... -its-cars/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Chizzang wrote:

kalm wrote:Campaign finance driven crony capitalism...

But wait...as Ganny and Chizzy suggest, it doesn't really matter and they're wasting their time and resources.


It's all understandable coming from donk states and governors who hate capitalism, but conks should stick to their "free market" guns.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... -its-cars/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Okay Mr. Smart ass you win this round

JohnStOnge wrote:Well if I understand you correctly I agree with you on this one. Reminds me of a situation we had in Louisiana recently. The State law was that you can't buy a coffin when your loved one dies except from a funeral home. That's ridiculous. There is absolutely no reason to require that. It was clearly just something people who operate funeral homes got put into the law.

But some monks sued and, fortunately, the Supreme Court ruled it's nonsense:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/20/lo ... directors/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There is absolutely no reason to require that someone buy a car through a dealership. None whatsoever.

kalm wrote:Campaign finance driven crony capitalism...

But wait...as Ganny and Chizzy suggest, it doesn't really matter and they're wasting their time and resources.


It's all understandable coming from donk states and governors who hate capitalism, but conks should stick to their "free market" guns.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... -its-cars/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

GannonFan wrote:

kalm wrote:Campaign finance driven crony capitalism...

But wait...as Ganny and Chizzy suggest, it doesn't really matter and they're wasting their time and resources.


It's all understandable coming from donk states and governors who hate capitalism, but conks should stick to their "free market" guns.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... -its-cars/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Silly remnants of the 1950's that you so love to want to get back to - amazing that you don't like certain aspects of yesteryear. Laws that specifically limit a competitor for the sheer purpose of crippling that competitor should be easy to challenge in court, and once Tesla gets one win it will be easier to win elsewhere.

JohnStOnge wrote:Well if I understand you correctly I agree with you on this one. Reminds me of a situation we had in Louisiana recently. The State law was that you can't buy a coffin when your loved one dies except from a funeral home. That's ridiculous. There is absolutely no reason to require that. It was clearly just something people who operate funeral homes got put into the law.

But some monks sued and, fortunately, the Supreme Court ruled it's nonsense:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/20/lo ... directors/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There is absolutely no reason to require that someone buy a car through a dealership. None whatsoever.

Yet, Republicans like you wanted exactly that in North Carolina.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Yet, Republicans like you wanted exactly that in North Carolina.

I'm not a Republican. I'm a Libertarian.

HOWEVER, if it comes down to it, I'd rather have Republicans running the country than Democrats running it. And for now that's what it comes down to as a practical matter.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Yet, Republicans like you wanted exactly that in North Carolina.

I'm not a Republican. I'm a Libertarian.

HOWEVER, if it comes down to it, I'd rather have Republicans running the country than Democrats running it. And for now that's what it comes down to as a practical matter.

houndawg wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
I'm not a Republican. I'm a Libertarian.

HOWEVER, if it comes down to it, I'd rather have Republicans running the country than Democrats running it. And for now that's what it comes down to as a practical matter.

Not a dime's worth of difference between them.

1.3 Personal Relationships
Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion
Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Yet, Republicans like you wanted exactly that in North Carolina.

I'm not a Republican. I'm a Libertarian.

HOWEVER, if it comes down to it, I'd rather have Republicans running the country than Democrats running it. And for now that's what it comes down to as a practical matter.