Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/2 ... /150409468" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A North Charleston police officer was arrested on a murder charge and the FBI opened a civil rights investigation Tuesday after video surfaced of the lawman shooting eight times at 50-year-old Walter Scott as he ran away.

Scott died Saturday after Patrolman 1st Class Michael Slager, 33, shot him in the back.

The video footage, which The Post and Courier obtained Tuesday from a source who asked to remain anonymous, shows the end of the confrontation between the two on Saturday after Scott ran from a traffic stop. It was the first piece of evidence contradicting a statement that Slager released earlier this week through his attorney.

Don't run from the police.

I think that under current law the policeman is toast. I will say, though, that I personally believe that the law should be such that if you try to run from the police they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. I don't agree with the standard that they can only shoot you if their life is in danger or someone else's life is in danger.

I do think cops are over aggressive in many cases and use excessive force fairly routinely. Nevertheless, when it comes to it, I have always believed that if the police are trying to get you and you flee they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. If you don't want to get shot, don't flee.

This is a non-story. If you watch the video, it's cold-blooded murder and the cop will be doing appropriate jail time.

The only reason it's a story is because of the respective colors of the participants.

Next.

93henfan wrote:This is a non-story. If you watch the video, it's cold-blooded murder and the cop will be doing appropriate jail time.

The only reason it's a story is because of the respective colors of the participants.

Next.

Yeah. Just a routine police execution. Showed that nigger who was boss. Isn't that your old outfit covering the profession with glory, CID?

houndawg wrote:

93henfan wrote:This is a non-story. If you watch the video, it's cold-blooded murder and the cop will be doing appropriate jail time.

The only reason it's a story is because of the respective colors of the participants.

Next.

Yeah. Just a routine police execution. Showed that nigger who was boss. Isn't that your old outfit covering the profession with glory, CID?

So you agree.

93henfan wrote:

houndawg wrote:

Yeah. Just a routine police execution. Showed that nigger who was boss. Isn't that your old outfit covering the profession with glory, CID?

So you agree.

Was dumb in the way he got caught trying to plant evidence. Shoulda killed the guy shooting the video as well.

dbackjon wrote:

93henfan wrote:
So you agree.

Was dumb in the way he got caught trying to plant evidence. Shoulda killed the guy shooting the video as well.

Probably.

It just goes to show that both cops and defendants lie a lot under oath. We see it in this case. We saw it by the "witnesses" in Ferguson.

Really, the biggest thing I took from all of this is that North Charleston police really need to work on their marksmanship training. That fucker couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. He'd have probably done better to throw his sidearm at the black before he got more than five feet away.

93henfan wrote:Really, the biggest thing I took from all of this is that North Charleston police really need to work on their marksmanship training. That fucker couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. He'd have probably done better to throw his sidearm at the black before he got more than five feet away.

Maybe they need to attend more NRA conventions-

dbackjon wrote:

93henfan wrote:Really, the biggest thing I took from all of this is that North Charleston police really need to work on their marksmanship training. That fucker couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. He'd have probably done better to throw his sidearm at the black before he got more than five feet away.

Maybe they need to attend more NRA conventions-

Or maybe just practice a little. Seriously, that was just terrible, terrible marksmanship. It's almost like the guy didn't realize that every miss could mean another dead person.

93henfan wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

Maybe they need to attend more NRA conventions-

Or maybe just practice a little. Seriously, that was just terrible, terrible marksmanship. It's almost like the guy didn't realize that every miss could mean another dead person.

His grip was slippery from the donuts.

JohnStOnge wrote:I think that under current law the policeman is toast. I will say, though, that I personally believe that the law should be such that if you try to run from the police they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. I don't agree with the standard that they can only shoot you if their life is in danger or someone else's life is in danger.

I do think cops are over aggressive in many cases and use excessive force fairly routinely. Nevertheless, when it comes to it, I have always believed that if the police are trying to get you and you flee they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. If you don't want to get shot, don't flee.

Your take-away from a routine traffic violation turned execution-by-cop is ^ this...?
Interesting perspective - If you "try to run" you should be allowed to be executed

93henfan wrote:

houndawg wrote:

Yeah. Just a routine police execution. Showed that n***** who was boss. Isn't that your old outfit covering the profession with glory, CID?

So you agree.

Absolutely. He would have walked easy if it hadn't been for the brass balls of whoever got the video. Now that motherfucker better go underground and stay there. The cop will be out in five years max.

This cracker better hope the warden puts him in a segregated wing. Man, a white cop in jail. Youch.

Hey boy. You sure got a perty mouth!

JohnStOnge wrote:I think that under current law the policeman is toast. I will say, though, that I personally believe that the law should be such that if you try to run from the police they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. I don't agree with the standard that they can only shoot you if their life is in danger or someone else's life is in danger.

I do think cops are over aggressive in many cases and use excessive force fairly routinely. Nevertheless, when it comes to it, I have always believed that if the police are trying to get you and you flee they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. If you don't want to get shot, don't flee.

They can. Happens all the time. Just this pig's bad luck that some witness was willing to risk his own life to get it on film.

And I'd hardly call that "fleeing". Old fuck was moving at a moderate waddle at best.

Didn't watch the video, but the summary says it shows the officer and the deadbeat dad wrestling over something in their hands...and then something falls to the ground.

"The three-minute clip of Saturday’s shooting starts shaky, but it steadies as Slager and Scott appear to be grabbing at each other’s hands.

Slager has said through his attorney that Scott had wrested his Taser from him during a struggle.

The video appears to show Scott slapping at the officer’s hands as several objects fall to the ground. It’s not clear what the objects are.

Scott starts running away. Wires from Slager’s Taser stretch from Scott’s clothing to the officer’s hands."

If it was the taser, then f*ck the guy that got shot. They guy had fled from police before, and had an assault and battery incident on his record. You grab an officer and his weapon, you should get shot, even if you change your mind and run away.

Really...when an officer stops you, just comply. If you fight back, you should be shot.

Cluck U wrote:Didn't watch the video, but the summary says it shows the officer and the deadbeat dad wrestling over something in their hands...and then something falls to the ground.

"The three-minute clip of Saturday’s shooting starts shaky, but it steadies as Slager and Scott appear to be grabbing at each other’s hands.

Slager has said through his attorney that Scott had wrested his Taser from him during a struggle.

The video appears to show Scott slapping at the officer’s hands as several objects fall to the ground. It’s not clear what the objects are.

Scott starts running away. Wires from Slager’s Taser stretch from Scott’s clothing to the officer’s hands."

If it was the taser, then f*ck the guy that got shot. They guy had fled from police before, and had an assault and battery incident on his record. You grab an officer and his weapon, you should get shot, even if you change your mind and run away.

Really...when an officer stops you, just comply. If you fight back, you should be shot.

Do yourself a favor and actually watch all ten seconds of the video. The attorney you quote dropped the cop as a client today as soon as the video was released. There is no defense here.

Cold blooded murder by an angry cop. Eight shots in the back of an old man running away.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXO3Ix_GIyI[/youtube]

93henfan wrote:This is a non-story. If you watch the video, it's cold-blooded murder and the cop will be doing appropriate jail time.

The only reason it's a story is because of the respective colors of the participants.

Next.

This

Next

93henfan wrote:
Do yourself a favor and actually watch all ten seconds of the video. The attorney you quote dropped the cop as a client today as soon as the video was released. There is no defense here.

Cold blooded murder by an angry cop. Eight shots in the back of an old man running away.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXO3Ix_GIyI[/youtube]

OK, so there appears to be a struggle and something fell to the ground. Taser?

Cop reaches for his gun and shoots the guy running away. Mind you, the guy already ran away once...the cop apparently caught up, and that's where the struggle, the beginning of which is not caught on tape, starts.

Don't run, don't grab a cop's taser or anything else.

Was the cop in danger? Probably not...but the guy was a repeat offender and ran from, and then engaged in a struggle with, a police officer.

Shoot the dog dead and save the system the trouble.

houndawg wrote:

93henfan wrote:This is a non-story. If you watch the video, it's cold-blooded murder and the cop will be doing appropriate jail time.

The only reason it's a story is because of the respective colors of the participants.

Next.

Yeah. Just a routine police execution. Showed that n***** who was boss. Isn't that your old outfit covering the profession with glory, CID?

No, Retard.

Read the article- it's NCPD, known for the occasional cowboy, like this guy.

93henfan wrote:This cracker better hope the warden puts him in a segregated wing. Man, a white cop in jail. Youch.

Hey boy. You sure got a perty mouth!

If he goes to prison he will be in permanent solitary. Gen pop is a death sentence for cops.

JohnStOnge wrote:I think that under current law the policeman is toast. I will say, though, that I personally believe that the law should be such that if you try to run from the police they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. I don't agree with the standard that they can only shoot you if their life is in danger or someone else's life is in danger.

I do think cops are over aggressive in many cases and use excessive force fairly routinely. Nevertheless, when it comes to it, I have always believed that if the police are trying to get you and you flee they should be able to shoot you in order to stop you. If you don't want to get shot, don't flee.

So they shouldn't be able to pull you over for a DUI but should be able to shoot you if you in any cases you run? Weird perspective you have...

Unlike everyone on here after every race related shooting (Martin/Zimmerman, Ferguson, Eric Garner, etc), I'm going to wait for the facts to come out in a trial before passing judgement...

BDKJMU wrote:Unlike everyone on here after every race related shooting (Martin/Zimmerman, Ferguson, Eric Garner, etc), I'm going to wait for the facts to come out in a trial before passing judgement...

The video is damning. SLED is also pretty good about investigating officer involved shootings, and so even if the vid didn't exist this guy would be toast- if for no other reason than the bullet placement and the range at which he was shot.

But from the vid it is obvious that the guy isn't a threat, and the fleeing felon rule won't apply here.. The best this guy can do is plead guilty for a deal.