Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Chizzang wrote:

The largest limiting factor regarding self driving car safety is humans...
and this should come as no surprise to anybody really

http://fusion.net/story/212208/californ ... t-reports/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

The largest limiting factor regarding self driving car safety is humans...
and this should come as no surprise to anybody really

http://fusion.net/story/212208/californ ... t-reports/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I like your enthusiasm for self driving cars

but it will be 200 years before enough American males develop the vaginas to use them

All of the accidents involved the cars being rear-ended

CAA Flagship wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I like your enthusiasm for self driving cars

but it will be 200 years before enough American males develop the vaginas to use them

All of the accidents involved the cars being rear-ended

This will be worse than humans driving a Prius.
TOO FUCKING SLOW!!!!!!!!

kalm wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:



This will be worse than humans driving a Prius.
TOO FUCKING SLOW!!!!!!!!

Agressive, self important drivers are responsible for rear ending.

Also some homo.

CAA Flagship wrote:

kalm wrote:
Agressive, self important drivers are responsible for rear ending.

Also some homo.

Why do you hate productive people, and homosexual drivers?

Chizzang wrote:Well this thread hasn't exactly gone like I wanted... Hmmm...

CAA Flagship wrote:

kalm wrote:
Agressive, self important drivers are responsible for rear ending.

Also some homo.

Why do you hate productive people, and homosexual drivers?

Chizzang wrote:Well this thread hasn't exactly gone like I wanted... Hmmm...

CID1990 wrote: but it will be 200 years before enough American males develop the vaginas to use them

Hybrids, plug-in cars and gas-sipping small cars may save you money on fuel, but they also make a statement about your attitude towards the environment. This is something younger buyers are becoming quite keen on.

McKinsey & Co's survey revealed that 47 percent of the young--those between 18-39 years old--showed greater willingness to pay extra for an electric car, and are keener to use low-CO2 vehicles.

The younger generations are also more aware of alternative-fuel vehicles. While electric cars have been relatively slow, they're also increasing steadily. There are still concerns over price (always a factor with younger drivers) and for electric vehicles, range anxiety--but the research suggests that once these barriers have been overcome, there's little really stopping an increase in popularity of plug-ins.

The McKinsey findings broadly echo other recent surveys of younger drivers, particularly "millenials" or "Generation Y" customers.

Last year, Deloitte revealed that 6 out of 10 younger drivers worldwide would prefer to drive a hybridthan most other kinds of vehicle.

Another, by GfK, revealed that while many aren't actually that interested in outright fuel efficiency, younger buyers are very much interested in the latest generation of small cars--which arefun to drive, and--wait for it--packed with technology.

Broadly, much of the research seems fairly consistent.

Skjellyfetti wrote:

CID1990 wrote: but it will be 200 years before enough American males develop the vaginas to use them

Naw. They said the same thing about hybrids and electrics.

Like those... we just have to wait for the prior generation that compensates with a 10 mpg truck with offroad tires they only drive on the highway to and from work.

Hybrids, plug-in cars and gas-sipping small cars may save you money on fuel, but they also make a statement about your attitude towards the environment. This is something younger buyers are becoming quite keen on.

McKinsey & Co's survey revealed that 47 percent of the young--those between 18-39 years old--showed greater willingness to pay extra for an electric car, and are keener to use low-CO2 vehicles.

The younger generations are also more aware of alternative-fuel vehicles. While electric cars have been relatively slow, they're also increasing steadily. There are still concerns over price (always a factor with younger drivers) and for electric vehicles, range anxiety--but the research suggests that once these barriers have been overcome, there's little really stopping an increase in popularity of plug-ins.

The McKinsey findings broadly echo other recent surveys of younger drivers, particularly "millenials" or "Generation Y" customers.

Last year, Deloitte revealed that 6 out of 10 younger drivers worldwide would prefer to drive a hybridthan most other kinds of vehicle.

Another, by GfK, revealed that while many aren't actually that interested in outright fuel efficiency, younger buyers are very much interested in the latest generation of small cars--which arefun to drive, and--wait for it--packed with technology.

Broadly, much of the research seems fairly consistent.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Ge ... ctric-cars" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

kalm wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Why do you hate productive people, and homosexual drivers?

Old Bull and young bull. Which one is more productive?

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yissiree. I'll tell you what, boy. Buncha faggots out there on the road. Them vaginized **** probably ain't even got a loaded .44 under their seat neither. Whoooheee!

Skjellyfetti wrote:On the same side of the Atlantic as you.

Gil Dobie wrote:

kalm wrote:
Old Bull and young bull. Which one is more productive?

In my work place, it depends on the individual bull. Some young and some old bulls are more productive than other young and old bulls.

kalm wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:
In my work place, it depends on the individual bull. Some young and some old bulls are more productive than other young and old bulls.

CID1990 wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:On the same side of the Atlantic as you.

I was wondering why it was so loud.

Where are you anyway?

Skjellyfetti wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I was wondering why it was so loud.

Where are you anyway?

Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Scientific research on the acclimitazion of an emasculated, vaginized American to a hyper-masculine society.

Skjellyfetti wrote:

CID1990 wrote: but it will be 200 years before enough American males develop the vaginas to use them

Naw. They said the same thing about hybrids and electrics.

Like those... we just have to wait for the prior generation that compensates with a 10 mpg truck with offroad tires they only drive on the highway to and from work.

Hybrids, plug-in cars and gas-sipping small cars may save you money on fuel, but they also make a statement about your attitude towards the environment. This is something younger buyers are becoming quite keen on.

McKinsey & Co's survey revealed that 47 percent of the young--those between 18-39 years old--showed greater willingness to pay extra for an electric car, and are keener to use low-CO2 vehicles.

The younger generations are also more aware of alternative-fuel vehicles. While electric cars have been relatively slow, they're also increasing steadily. There are still concerns over price (always a factor with younger drivers) and for electric vehicles, range anxiety--but the research suggests that once these barriers have been overcome, there's little really stopping an increase in popularity of plug-ins.

The McKinsey findings broadly echo other recent surveys of younger drivers, particularly "millenials" or "Generation Y" customers.

Last year, Deloitte revealed that 6 out of 10 younger drivers worldwide would prefer to drive a hybridthan most other kinds of vehicle.

Another, by GfK, revealed that while many aren't actually that interested in outright fuel efficiency, younger buyers are very much interested in the latest generation of small cars--which arefun to drive, and--wait for it--packed with technology.

Broadly, much of the research seems fairly consistent.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Ge ... ctric-cars" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

kalm wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:



This will be worse than humans driving a Prius.
TOO FUCKING SLOW!!!!!!!!

Agressive, self important drivers are responsible for rear ending.

Also some homo.

Ibanez wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:
Naw. They said the same thing about hybrids and electrics.

Like those... we just have to wait for the prior generation that compensates with a 10 mpg truck with offroad tires they only drive on the highway to and from work.



http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Ge ... ctric-cars" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I have a hybrid Civic and I wish I didn't. The mpg is only one side of the coin. Yeah, you save money, but you better put that money aside for the $3000 hybrid battery that will fail. Or you better put it aside to spend $2600 on fixing a part of the brake system, that on a normal car only costs a $100-$300. The upkeep and repair of the hybrid specific components is outrageous.

Oh, and the part is a known problem that affects millions of cars, but Honda will not issue a recall. I guess a problem with the brakes isn't a priority.

Ibanez wrote: I have a hybrid Civic and don't like vaginas