Page 1 of 1

UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:09 am
by hank scorpio
UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir
By CHELSI MOY
Of the Missoulian

A University of Montana law professor has taken her concerns about a weekly sex column in the student-run newspaper, The Kaimin, to top school administrators.

Professor Kristen Juras wrote a letter last week to UM President George Dennison and School of Journalism Dean Peggy Kuhr, requesting that they meet with the Kaimin editorial staff to "ask them to reconsider their publication of this column."

And, Juras said she'll take her complaints about student Bess Davis' "Bess Sex Column" all the way to state higher education officials if necessary.

"Freedom of speech is not absolute," Juras said. "There is accountability and responsibility. (The Kaimin is) funded by taxpayer dollars and tuition fees for an educational purpose, and they have to stay within that purpose." Another UM law professor, Rob Natelson, recently blogged about the issue under the headline "State-funded porn."

Kaimin editor Bill Oram, however, defended the newspaper's decision to publish a sex column and has no intention of pulling the feature or restricting its content.

While Oram said he is open to talking about policies, he said he'd be concerned if the Kaimin's content was left to the discretion of a board that included people not trained as journalists.

Besides, Oram said, "We have an audience that cares a great deal about the issue of sex."

But Juras finds the column's content inappropriate, especially in a general circulation newspaper "funded in large by student fees and taxpayer money."

Her law school colleague Natelson wrote March 5 in the Electric City blog, "No doubt there are people out there who will explain to me why distributing porn among unmarried post-pubescents is such a critical function of government that people should be forced to pay for it."


Advertising revenue
The Kaimin, which published a story last week about the controversy, is funded primarily through advertising revenue, said Kaimin business manager Joe Licitra. About 35 percent of the newspaper's total operating revenue comes from student fees.

Despite the recent buzz about the sex column, Oram had received only a handful of complaints prior to Wednesday.

Dennison's office received three complaints, and UM legal counsel David Aronofsky said his office received two.

Dennison said he has not yet read the column, but imagines he'll look at it soon. This is a situation where the students are learning how their decisions affect others, he said.

The column gives tips on everything from cheap, stay-in dates to new sexual positions.

Davis, a 21-year-old senior in journalism, describes the column as "vanilla" compared to other sex columns published nationally and on other college campuses.

"I'm shocked this is such an issue," said Davis, who said she is confused and "slightly annoyed" by all the fuss. Many student newspapers print more risque sex columns, she said.

Carol Van Valkenburg, chair of the print journalism department, has been the faculty adviser to the Kaimin for more than 25 years. In that time, there's never been a sex column published in the newspaper, she said.

That's one reason Davis wanted to write one. The Kaimin was behind the times, she said. Plus, "it's something I'm into, like most people. But I'm more honest about it."


Healthy sexuality
Juras said she is not against a sex column in the Kaimin. She understands the students' First Amendment rights provided under the U.S. Constitution and would welcome a column that is about healthy sexuality.

Helena attorney Mike Meloy specializes in First Amendment issues and considers Juras' request to school administrators a slippery slope.

The editor has the authority to dictate the content in the newpspaper, he said.

"It's very, very difficult to draft a rule that governs content that passes constitutional muster," Meloy said.

That's especially true of anything dealing with obscenity, he said. Nothing in Davis' column appears obscene from a legal perspective, he said.

Student reactions to the sex column vary.

For Sara Harvey, a junior in social work, reading Davis' column is "guilty pleasure." She relates to some of the columns and finds them humorous.

"I thought it was funny," said the 21-year-old. "(Sex) shouldn't be taboo or something that's censored. It's a university, for God's sake."

On the other hand, Daniel Viehland, 19, considers sex a spiritual act. So while he thinks a sex column is worthwhile for a student newspaper, he says this particular column "focuses on sex in the lowest-common-denominator way. Sex is an act of making love, and it doesn't treat it as such."

Meanwhile, Davis is mulling over possible topics for her upcoming column. She's toyed with the idea of oral sex, but she's yet to find an angle.

"They need to have a point or it is really just pornography," she said.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:08 pm
by TwinTownBisonFan
AZGriz --- here is the time to voice your complaint about a whiny fringe minority demanding to have its way.

puritans... if the paper loses too much ground... Dan Savage will let them syndicate "savage love" for next to nothing... his column is MUCH more graphic.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:24 pm
by Grizalltheway
The column really is god-awful, I don't how she even got into the journalism school here. That being said, that professor is an uber-Christian nut job who needs a better cause to throw her energy behind.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:30 pm
by dgreco
the Bryant Archway actually has a professor (first lesbian married in RI) and advisor of the Bryant Pride student org. writes the sex column for the paper. It is so over the top I am surprised it is even printed. Especially since she teaches here and she gets even personal sometimes in the columns. I am trying to find one online, but having a tough time the website sucks.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:37 pm
by dgreco
http://media.www.bryantarchway.com/medi ... 8383.shtml

only article I could find. This is a fairly mellow one too.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:17 pm
by Pwns
Sorry, I'm no prude, but I have to agree with Juras on this one, though I disagree with her calling it "porn". Unless the paper is self-sustaining, why take up valuable space with a sex column when you could use it for more conventional journalism that students really need to be practicing?

For those that disgaree, have you ever actually read a sex column in a college newspaper? It's not nearly as exciting as you probably think it is. In fact, sex columns usually have the stupidest bunch of drivel you could possibly imagine. Think of an episode of "Sex and the City" except with absolutely no wit or anything of substance. Even advocates of so-called "comprehensive sex education" have beefs with them as they typically don't know what they are talking about.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:24 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
TwinTownBisonFan wrote:AZGriz --- here is the time to voice your complaint about a whiny fringe minority demanding to have its way.

puritans... if the paper loses too much ground... Dan Savage will let them syndicate "savage love" for next to nothing... his column is MUCH more graphic.
That was exactly my thought while reading this. This is one where I'll line up with ya AZ and say this GD prof. and her little fringe can suck a big one. BTW the guy from Helena is one hell of a law dog and knows his shit. If the girls article is bad that's fine but there is no reason to try and force the moral high ground shit from this professor. You do not have the right to not be offended I hope the prof. gets told to go make a serious attempt at pissing up a rope.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:28 pm
by Ursus A. Horribilis
Pwns wrote:Sorry, I'm no prude, but I have to agree with Juras on this one, though I disagree with her calling it "porn". Unless the paper is self-sustaining, why take up valuable space with a sex column when you could use it for more conventional journalism that students really need to be practicing?

For those that disgaree, have you ever actually read a sex column in a college newspaper? It's not nearly as exciting as you probably think it is. In fact, sex columns usually have the stupidest bunch of drivel you could possibly imagine. Think of an episode of "Sex and the City" except with absolutely no wit or anything of substance. Even advocates of so-called "comprehensive sex education" have beefs with them as they typically don't know what they are talking about.
Yeah they lack quality as do most other sections of a college newspaper. They are in training and trying to learn the art of writing a good article. I'll go ahead and leave it up to the Editor as to what they deem the valuable space best be used for.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:35 pm
by travelinman67
Professor can go suck eggs. If her Christian beliefs are what's provoking her objections, then she's not been paying attention the past 30 years.
I've read TONS of articles published in college papers the past few decades which I strenuously find un-Christian, and personally find objectionable.

But...

So long as the paper allows articles of dissenting opinion without censorship...this is a no harm, no foul situation.

Both views represented. Constitution in abidence. Just walk on.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:19 pm
by TwinTownBisonFan
Pwns wrote:Sorry, I'm no prude, but I have to agree with Juras on this one, though I disagree with her calling it "porn". Unless the paper is self-sustaining, why take up valuable space with a sex column when you could use it for more conventional journalism that students really need to be practicing?

For those that disgaree, have you ever actually read a sex column in a college newspaper? It's not nearly as exciting as you probably think it is. In fact, sex columns usually have the stupidest bunch of drivel you could possibly imagine. Think of an episode of "Sex and the City" except with absolutely no wit or anything of substance. Even advocates of so-called "comprehensive sex education" have beefs with them as they typically don't know what they are talking about.
I'd make two points to this:

1. The quality of the article is frankly immaterial. If she can't write, that's between her and her editor.

2. Yeah, college sex columns tend to be horrible... but when I was in school the one thing everyone read in the Spectrum was the sex column (and the Happy Harry's alcohol ad)... thing is... my senior year, that writer moved on... and the Spectrum became filled with articles culled from the AP.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:13 pm
by griz37
Yes the column is terrible, but so is the Kaimin for the most part. Back in my day '98-02 the Kaimin had good sports writers, namely a mystery guy named "The Bench" who actually made the paper worth reading. Who does this law professor think is being offended, drunk & horny college students?

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:54 pm
by Willie
At least they allowed to be printed at all.

My school is an Evangelical Lutheran based college and up until last year, they were completely oblivious that their students were engaging in sexual activities. They just wouldn't listen, they heard what they wanted to hear. That was until someone wrote a letter to the editor of our school paper and basically told them what was "going down" at this little school.

Since then, they have a weekly sex column, which I don't read, but I've heard it's of decent quality.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:41 pm
by TwinTownBisonFan
Willie wrote:At least they allowed to be printed at all.

My school is an Evangelical Lutheran based college and up until last year, they were completely oblivious that their students were engaging in sexual activities. They just wouldn't listen, they heard what they wanted to hear. That was until someone wrote a letter to the editor of our school paper and basically told them what was "going down" at this little school.

Since then, they have a weekly sex column, which I don't read, but I've heard it's of decent quality.
It's funny because ELCA is known as the more "liberal" of the Lutheran sects (Mo. Synod being very conservative and Wisc. Evang. Luth. Synod being CRAZY right wing)

but yeah, when I was up there Cordhead was known as "the virgin vault" owing to the chastity of their women... allegedly SU was known as "the sausage school" owing to our 50-50 male/female ratio

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:22 am
by Wedgebuster
Did somebody actually use the word "need" and "college newspaper" in the same sentence? My old college rag The Mirror could not have possibly had anything in it that was needed.

Still chuckle about some of those Bong Albright comic adventures that were only found there.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:15 am
by hank scorpio
griz37 wrote:Yes the column is terrible, but so is the Kaimin for the most part. Back in my day '98-02 the Kaimin had good sports writers, namely a mystery guy named "The Bench" who actually made the paper worth reading. Who does this law professor think is being offended, drunk & horny college students?
All I remember from that same time was the "noxious odors" emitting from Jesse Hall in the police report, the fat naked chick streaking to protest bison hazing, and all the negative press our fraternity would get.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:59 am
by hank scorpio
Debate on UM sex column planned
By the Missoulian

MISSOULA - As the controversy continues over a sex column in the University of Montana student newspaper, a UM student group is organizing a debate between law school faculty members to discuss the First Amendment.

Law professor Kristen Juras, who recently took her concerns regarding senior journalism major Bess Davis' "Bess Sex" column to school administrators, verbally accepted an invitation to an educational debate hosted by the UM American Constitutional Society for Law and Policy.

The student group also extended an invitation to law professor Larry Howell, a former Missoulian reporter, who seemed "receptive to the idea," said James Reavis, president of UM's American Constitutional Society.

The student group promotes fundamental rights and access to justice, but is nonpartisan and doesn't take sides on the issue, Reavis said. It is not yet known whether the group will extend invitations to others. No date, time or location has been determined, either. However, the student group hopes to host the event on campus.

Reavis envisions that the format would involve a moderator who asks questions of the panelists before opening up questions to the public, he said.

"I'm hoping the students can learn what the rules are and what the First Amendment is and what it says and then decide what it ought to mean," Capulong said. "That's what teaching is all about."

http://billingsgazette.net/articles/200 ... outsex.txt

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:09 pm
by griz37
hank scorpio wrote:
griz37 wrote:Yes the column is terrible, but so is the Kaimin for the most part. Back in my day '98-02 the Kaimin had good sports writers, namely a mystery guy named "The Bench" who actually made the paper worth reading. Who does this law professor think is being offended, drunk & horny college students?
All I remember from that same time was the "noxious odors" emitting from Jesse Hall in the police report, the fat naked chick streaking to protest bison hazing, and all the negative press our fraternity would get.
What fraternity were you in? I remember that fat naked chick on the front page of the Kaimin.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:23 pm
by Cap'n Cat
TwinTownBisonFan wrote:AZGriz --- here is the time to voice your complaint about a whiny fringe minority demanding to have its way.

puritans... if the paper loses too much ground... Dan Savage will let them syndicate "savage love" for next to nothing... his column is MUCH more graphic.


Reppies for TTBF. Very salient point.

Re: UM newspaper's sex column causes campus stir

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:25 am
by hank scorpio
griz37 wrote:
hank scorpio wrote:
All I remember from that same time was the "noxious odors" emitting from Jesse Hall in the police report, the fat naked chick streaking to protest bison hazing, and all the negative press our fraternity would get.
What fraternity were you in? I remember that fat naked chick on the front page of the Kaimin.
SAE, but I might be trumping it up in my head. For all of the philanthropy we did (Boys & Girls Club, Adopt a Highway, building a playground, food drives, etc.) the only things the Kaimin would ever call about were things like an MIP at the tailgate or a fist fight on the lawn.