Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

"44% of Democrats Welcome Refugees from Agrabah, Home of Disney’s Aladdin

Just last week, Democrats in the media were guffawing over a poll which showed 30% of Republican primary voters would bomb the fictional city from Disney’s Aladdin. This week a Republican polling group asked a similar question of Democrats, and the results were even more embarrassing, with 44% of Democrats saying they’d support taking in refugees from Agrabah....."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... s-aladdin/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So looks like dinks have a higher percentage of idiots than conks...

So let's split the difference. 37% of Americans are idiots.

That's lower than I thought.

I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

Vidav wrote:I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

So 93 is right. It is just a matter of degrees

Vidav wrote:I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

All things being equal, I'd rather fantasy foreigners die than fantasy Americans.

93henfan wrote:So let's split the difference. 37% of Americans are idiots.

That's lower than I thought.

I have always told my kids that it is 80%. They now laugh because they think it is higher.

Vidav wrote:I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

lol

well played

AZGrizFan wrote:

Vidav wrote:I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

Not in this context, dumbfuck.

CID1990 wrote:lol

well played

Sure about that?

D1B wrote:

CID1990 wrote:lol

well played

Sure about that?

you mad, bro?


any retard could have seen this coming


If Dems want to have trolly polls that make Republicans look silly then they should be prepared for the same - because stupidity knows no political affiliation

CID1990 wrote:

D1B wrote:
Sure about that?

you mad, bro?


any retard could have seen this coming


If Dems want to have trolly polls that make Republicans look silly then they should be prepared for the same - because stupidity knows no political affiliation

I'm always mad.

I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

Dems have advantage in low informational, knee jerk voters by a margin of 44-30%. That seems about right.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Vidav wrote:I would say being willing to let in refugees from an unknown place is less idiotic than saying you were willing to bomb a place without knowing all about it.

Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

Worse yet is bombing the wrong place.

kalm wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

Worse yet is bombing the wrong place.

unless the wrong place is muslins

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Worse yet is bombing the wrong place.

unless the wrong place is muslins

Unless the wrong place is a secular autocracy.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
unless the wrong place is muslins

Unless the wrong place is a secular autocracy.

Good to see you're acknowledging that we should not tamper with those who know best how to keep the reins on muslin berzerkers

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Unless the wrong place is a secular autocracy.

Good to see you're acknowledging that we should not tamper with those who know best how to keep the reins on muslin berzerkers

Pragmatism has it's place.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

Not in this context, dumbfuck.

Z missed the point entirely. Shocker.

kalm wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Isn't it better to bomb a fictional place than a real one?

Worse yet is bombing the wrong place.

Sometimes its just best to get bombed.

Grizalltheway wrote:

D1B wrote:
Not in this context, dumbfuck.

Z missed the point entirely. Shocker.

No, Z didn't miss the point. Z was trying to make a subtle attempt at humor that apparently your literal mind couldnt wrap its pea-sized brain around...

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: Z missed the point entirely. Shocker.

No, Z didn't miss the point. Z was trying to make a subtle attempt at humor that apparently your literal mind couldnt wrap its pea-sized brain around...

The "I was trying to be funny" gambit.

Nice try.