What is religious garb? What is satire?

[D1B]

Who are you, D1C?

He's D1F.

Never once defended child molesters. I have warned against witch hunts, like the one that the Philly DA is on.

You lost that one too.

You defend pedophiles and the people and church systems who protect pedophiles.

You minimize their crimes and place blame on victims.

[JoltinJoe]

He's D1F.

Never once defended child molesters. I have warned against witch hunts, like the one that the Philly DA is on.

You lost that one too.

You defend pedophiles and the people and church systems who protect pedophiles.

You minimize their crimes and place blame on victims.

You've twisted and distorted the facts of what actually happened (which were bad enough), because you had an agenda. And that agenda had nothing to figure out what actually happened, in order to protect children going forward. Your agenda was anti-religious, disguised as "concern" for children.

[JoltinJoe]

You lost that one too.

I guess you didn't see the appeals court, on remand from the PA Supreme Court, overturned Monsignor Lynn's conviction again?

http://6abc.com/news/da-seeks-rehearing ... e/1138248/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How many times is this corrupt DA going to keep a man jailed as a result of the DA's distorted version of the "facts"? I'm not sure why Lynn is responsible for the bad acts of others.

There were so many things wrong -- intentionally wrong -- with that trial that I can't understand why any person of good faith would continue the witch hunt. Plus, even the first decision of the PA Supreme Court can still be reviewed in federal court by way of a writ of habeas corpus. Convicting a man under a statute that did not exist at the time of his actions was ridiculous and obviously unconstitutional.

There seems to be a tug of war in the case. The trial judge was clearly an anti-Catholic zealot. The elected members of the PA Supreme Court issued a ridiculous decision that was unconstitutional, but played to popular emotion (largely stoked by distortions).

But the appellate court has called this prosecution out -- twice --as severely flawed. If the PA Supreme Court plays games again, I don't have any doubt a federal court will vacate the state law conviction due to the numerous constitutional violations, when ruling on a writ of habeas corpus.

[D1B]

You lost that one too.

You defend pedophiles and the people and church systems who protect pedophiles.

You minimize their crimes and place blame on victims.

You've twisted and distorted the facts of what actually happened (which were bad enough), because you had an agenda. And that agenda had nothing to figure out what actually happened, in order to protect children going forward. Your agenda was anti-religious, disguised as "concern" for children.

Nobody expects you to understand the ugly truth behind your cult.

[D1B]

You lost that one too.

I guess you didn't see the appeals court, on remand from the PA Supreme Court, overturned Monsignor Lynn's conviction again?

http://6abc.com/news/da-seeks-rehearing ... e/1138248/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How many times is this corrupt DA going to keep a man jailed as a result of the DA's distorted version of the "facts"? I'm not sure why Lynn is responsible for the bad acts of others.

There were so many things wrong -- intentionally wrong -- with that trial that I can't understand why any person of good faith would continue the witch hunt. Plus, even the first decision of the PA Supreme Court can still be reviewed in federal court by way of a writ of habeas corpus. Convicting a man under a statute that did not exist at the time of his actions was ridiculous and obviously unconstitutional.

There seems to be a tug of war in the case. The trial judge was clearly an anti-Catholic zealot. The elected members of the PA Supreme Court issued a ridiculous decision that was unconstitutional, but played to popular emotion (largely stoked by distortions).

But the appellate court has called this prosecution out -- twice --as severely flawed. If the PA Supreme Court plays games again, I don't have any doubt a federal court will vacate the state law conviction due to the numerous constitutional violations, when ruling on a writ of habeas corpus.

Impressive, but Lynn is a pedophile protector and is ruined no matter what.

A win for justice.

Your church is a mess.

[JoltinJoe]

And if he had priest garb on, I'm sure you'd direct him to the nearest truck stop.

The only time priests speed is when they are racing to a scene to perform last rites. I would give him a police escort and get him there in time.

Nothing? No response?

I guess I'm losing my gift for trolling.