D1B wrote:
You lost that one too.
I guess you didn't see the appeals court, on remand from the PA Supreme Court, overturned Monsignor Lynn's conviction again?
http://6abc.com/news/da-seeks-rehearing ... e/1138248/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
How many times is this corrupt DA going to keep a man jailed as a result of the DA's distorted version of the "facts"? I'm not sure why Lynn is responsible for the bad acts of others.
There were so many things wrong -- intentionally wrong -- with that trial that I can't understand why any person of good faith would continue the witch hunt. Plus, even the first decision of the PA Supreme Court can still be reviewed in federal court by way of a writ of
habeas corpus. Convicting a man under a statute that did not exist at the time of his actions was ridiculous and obviously unconstitutional.
There seems to be a tug of war in the case. The trial judge was clearly an anti-Catholic zealot. The elected members of the PA Supreme Court issued a ridiculous decision that was unconstitutional, but played to popular emotion (largely stoked by distortions).
But the appellate court has called this prosecution out -- twice --as severely flawed. If the PA Supreme Court plays games again, I don't have any doubt a federal court will vacate the state law conviction due to the numerous constitutional violations, when ruling on a writ of
habeas corpus.