Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Gary Johnson threw his hat in the ring today on Fox Business! He's running for the Libertarian Party nomination again. You in?

Of course! As should every fiscally conservative, freedom loving person on this board.

The dude in the coon hat with side flaps shouldn't give him too much trouble

hell a few weeks ago I looked at the Libertarian Party's lineup of candidates and was tempted to announce myself

Think about it...

If Trump wins the nomination, you'll have JSO voting for Hillary and Kalm voting for Gary Johnson.

How awesome is that!

(Shame on JSO...shame)

If Trump gets the GOP nod, I will either vote for Johnson or write in D1B.

Ivytalk wrote:If Trump gets the GOP nod, I will either vote for Johnson or write in D1B.

D1B is too much of a Scott Walker acolyte.

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:If Trump gets the GOP nod, I will either vote for Johnson or write in D1B.

D1B is too much of a Scott Walker acolyte.

Who?

Anyway, if some other jamoke beats out Johnson for the Libertarian nomination, I'll write myself in.

Ivytalk wrote:

kalm wrote:
D1B is too much of a Scott Walker acolyte.

Who?

Anyway, if some other jamoke beats out Johnson for the Libertarian nomination, I'll write myself in.

FTR...Kalm is also a big Bob Barr fan.

As I've said many times, I have no problem with libertarians, but Libertarians are batshit crazy.

89Hen wrote:As I've said many times, I have no problem with libertarians, but Libertarians are batshit crazy.

And Trump isn't? Will you actually pull the "R" lever if Trump is the nominee?

89Hen wrote:As I've said many times, I have no problem with libertarians, but Libertarians are batshit crazy.

all it takes is to look at their slate of candidates on their website to reach that conclusion

that said, I think it is hard to codify a political belief system into an idea that personal liberty should be the cornerstone of politics

all the other groups and parties talk about what we should be doing to mold and shape societies

libertarianism, when you try to make it into a party, naturally winds up looking a bit crazy because there's not much else to talk about outside of protecting your skull from alien rays

since all thing political center on what should not be done vs what should

Ivytalk wrote:

89Hen wrote:As I've said many times, I have no problem with libertarians, but Libertarians are batshit crazy.

And Trump isn't? Will you actually pull the "R" lever if Trump is the nominee?

Probably not. I think abstaining sends just as much of a message as voting for a third party.

CID1990 wrote:

89Hen wrote:As I've said many times, I have no problem with libertarians, but Libertarians are batshit crazy.

all it takes is to look at their slate of candidates on their website to reach that conclusion

that said, I think it is hard to codify a political belief system into an idea that personal liberty should be the cornerstone of politics

all the other groups and parties talk about what we should be doing to mold and shape societies

libertarianism, when you try to make it into a party, naturally winds up looking a bit crazy because there's not much else to talk about outside of protecting your skull from alien rays

since all thing political center on what should not be done vs what should

What's with you and the punctuation thing? Just like Chizzy. I should call you Haiku 2.

89Hen wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:
And Trump isn't? Will you actually pull the "R" lever if Trump is the nominee?

Probably not. I think abstaining sends just as much of a message as voting for a third party.

What message does it send? That you take voting privileges for granted?

Grizalltheway wrote:

89Hen wrote: Probably not. I think abstaining sends just as much of a message as voting for a third party.

What message does it send? That you take voting privileges for granted?

No message. Just like voting third party.

kalm wrote:Of course! As should every fiscally conservative, freedom loving person on this board.

89Hen wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
What message does it send? That you take voting privileges for granted?

No message. Just like voting third party.

I think mine was more accurate.

Grizalltheway wrote:

89Hen wrote: No message. Just like voting third party.

I think mine was more accurate.

That I take voting privileges for granted? Why shouldn't I?

89Hen wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
I think mine was more accurate.

That I take voting privileges for granted? Why shouldn't I?

Because there's billions of people in the world who...ahh fuck it. You don't care.

Grizalltheway wrote:

89Hen wrote: That I take voting privileges for granted? Why shouldn't I?

Because there's billions of people in the world who...ahh fuck it. You don't care.

Why do you keep interjecting in kalm's thread?

Grizalltheway wrote:

89Hen wrote: That I take voting privileges for granted? Why shouldn't I?

Because there's billions of people in the world who...ahh fuck it. You don't care.

Exactly. I was born a US citizen and voting is a birth right, so of course I take it for granted.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Because there's billions of people in the world who...ahh **** it. You don't care.

Why do you keep interjecting in kalm's thread?

It's MY thread, dammit!

Was at a chamber of commerce breakfast today and Chris Cillizza was a guest speaker. He spoke on both parties, who can win, who can't and also a little on why this country won't have a third party in our lifetimes. Was very funny, candid and spot on.