Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Chizzang wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

I fully support the right of ALL Americans to own a front-loading musket.

Chizzang wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:Andrew is correct, again. Iz why I laughed at the last assault rifle ban, it was largely directed to imported rifles, especially the dirt cheap SKSs and AK knock-offs. The Ruger Mini-14 does all the same stuff (with fewer jams by the way) as any foreign or domestic semi-automatic assault rifle, and you could buy all of 'em you wanted during that last "ban."

Ironically, all the present day Chuck Norris want-to-be young punk types would not be seen with such a boring looking fire arm as the wood stocked Mini, nah, they gotta have a AK57 UZI RADAR LAZER TRIPLE BARRELED DOUBLE SCOPED HEAT SEAKIN SHOTGUN!

Wedgebuster wrote:Andrew is correct, again. Iz why I laughed at the last assault rifle ban, it was largely directed to imported rifles, especially the dirt cheap SKSs and AK knock-offs. The Ruger Mini-14 does all the same stuff (with fewer jams by the way) as any foreign or domestic semi-automatic assault rifle, and you could buy all of 'em you wanted during that last "ban."

Ironically, all the present day Chuck Norris want-to-be young punk types would not be seen with such a boring looking fire arm as the wood stocked Mini, nah, they gotta have a AK57 UZI RADAR LAZER TRIPLE BARRELED DOUBLE SCOPED HEAT SEAKIN SHOTGUN!

dbackjon wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

I fully support the right of ALL Americans to own a front-loading musket.

CID1990 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
I fully support the right of ALL Americans to own a front-loading musket.

Tired, dead logic.


The Constitution didn't envision computers, either... but here we sit, typing away, protected by the 1st Amendment.


BTW- it's called "muzzle loading". You must be channeling your soul mate: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/f ... -1.2673201

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
Iron Sights

CID1990 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
I fully support the right of ALL Americans to own a front-loading musket.

Tired, dead logic.


The Constitution didn't envision computers, either... but here we sit, typing away, protected by the 1st Amendment.


BTW- it's called "muzzle loading". You must be channeling your soul mate: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/f ... -1.2673201

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Tired, dead logic.


The Constitution didn't envision computers, either... but here we sit, typing away, protected by the 1st Amendment.


BTW- it's called "muzzle loading". You must be channeling your soul mate: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/f ... -1.2673201

Sure. And I've had several debates with Ivytalk on whether a computer/smart phone/emails should be considered personal effects.

Revisionist!

Gil Dobie wrote:So has Obama officially started the "War on Guns"?

My dull looking, wood grain, semi-automatic rifle, was good for shooting varmints on the farm.

Gil Dobie wrote:So has Obama officially started the "War on Guns"?

My dull looking, wood grain, semi-automatic rifle, was good for shooting varmints on the farm.

Democratic leaders came out in force on Wednesday in favor of a proposal to prohibit Americans who are on federal government terrorist watchlists from purchasing firearms. A group of Democratic senators waged a fillibuster on the Senate floor. And after presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump announced that he intends to meet with the powerful National Rifle Association to discuss a similar restriction, presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton welcomed him to the cause.

For Democrats, however, the move amounts to a strong endorsement of a system that civil liberties advocates have called a “Kafkaesque bureaucracy,” and which some Democrats have previously criticized for being secretive, unaccountable, and discriminatory.

Getting your name on a watchlist is much easier than getting it off. According to interagency watchlisting guidelines The Intercept published in 2013, it takes neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence” to add someone’s name as a terror suspect. The guidelines allow the administration to name individuals as representatives of terrorist groups they have no demonstrable connection to, or to name entire “categories” of people on to the no-fly list.