Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Awesome this chick is kick-ass !!!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srGlyFyghRk[/youtube]

Can you imagine being married to her?

"JFC, all I did was ask what was for dinner!!!!"

CAA Flagship wrote:Can you imagine being married to her?

"JFC, all I did was ask what was for dinner!!!!"

IIRC, her tax-evading husband cheated on her, and she dumped him.

Ivytalk wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:Can you imagine being married to her?

"JFC, all I did was ask what was for dinner!!!!"

IIRC, her tax-evading husband cheated on her, and she dumped him.

Bitch has a short fuse.

I really like how she lays the wood to Obama and Mitt Romney at the same time - that's quality !!!

Not bad looking for 64...

I'd do it to her.

I'll bet she fvcks like a greyhound bitch....

CAA Flagship wrote:Can you imagine being married to her?

I'd spend a lot of money on stiffy pills. But, she like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh is missing something here. They appear to think the opposition to Donald Trump is the Republican "Establishment." It's partially true. Yes, the Republican "Establishment" is against Trump. But what they are missing is that an awful lot of people who have historically been "insurgent" Republicans are ALSO vehemently anti Trump.

And Romney was spot on with his assessment of what Trump is.

Says the husband of the establishment.

andy7171 wrote:Says the husband of the establishment.

As I've written before, my wife is not "establishment." She was recruited a few years back to run against the "establishment" candidate. She is a Ted Cruz supporter. Whatever you think of Cruz, he is not a favored son of the Republican Establishment.

In the context of the Republican Party, she is not "establishment" at all. She is "insurgent."

In any case, it is NOT just the Republican "establishment" that doesn't want Trump. An awful lot of people who have historically been referenced as being the Republican "base" that was viewed as so unruly don't want him either. And it's not just that they'd rather have some other candidate they favor. They DESPISE trump and absolutely will NOT support him in a general election.

JohnStOnge wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:Can you imagine being married to her?

I'd spend a lot of money on stiffy pills. But, she like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh is missing something here. They appear to think the opposition to Donald Trump is the Republican "Establishment." It's partially true. Yes, the Republican "Establishment" is against Trump. But what they are missing is that an awful lot of people who have historically been "insurgent" Republicans are ALSO vehemently anti Trump.

And Romney was spot on with his assessment of what Trump is.

It's like for the first time, you are realizing what your party has become. You're like little Republican Neo. Truth and awakening can be brutal sometimes.

Establishment apologist!

Ok, I'm 2 minutes into the video and so far Flaggy has absolutely nailed it!

"Those of us working two or three jobs.."

I love it when the anti-establishment establishment go all man on the street!



I'll try and powerfully wade through the rest later...

It's like for the first time, you are realizing what your party has become.

It's not my party, though as a practical matter i view the Republican Party as the only thing that can effectively stem the destructive influence of the Democratic Party so I will pretty much always vote Republican.

Having said that, what's going on now is not what the Republican Party has been. To the extent that there is a "has become" it's a very recent "has become." As noted in an article you linked in starting the thread at http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 10&t=45184 what we're talking about is Trump "attracting" a bunch of people who have not previously been in the Party.

And I don't think these people are coming in order to be in the Republican Party. They're just doing what they need to do in order to vote for Trump.

JohnStOnge wrote:

It's like for the first time, you are realizing what your party has become.

It's not my party, though as a practical matter i view the Republican Party as the only thing that can effectively stem the destructive influence of the Democratic Party so I will pretty much always vote Republican.

Having said that, what's going on now is not what the Republican Party has been. To the extent that there is a "has become" it's a very recent "has become." As noted in an article you linked in starting the thread at http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 10&t=45184 what we're talking about is Trump "attracting" a bunch of people who have not previously been in the Party.

And I don't think these people are coming in order to be in the Republican Party. They're just doing what they need to do in order to vote for Trump.

Oh...I'm sorry. Who is about to win the Republican nomination?

Perhaps I should have phrased it as "who your party attracts..."

Perhaps I should have phrased it as "who your party attracts..."

It's not the Republican Party that attracted Trump voters. It's Trump. As the author of the article you posted in the other thread noted, what's going on is that people who are not Republicans are crossing over in order to vote in Republican primaries for Trump.

The author of the article looked at it as attracting new people to the Republican Party. But that's not what it is.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Perhaps I should have phrased it as "who your party attracts..."

It's not the Republican Party that attracted Trump voters. It's Trump. As the author of the article you posted in the other thread noted, what's going on is that people who are not Republicans are crossing over in order to vote in Republican primaries for Trump.

The author of the article looked at it as attracting new people to the Republican Party. But that's not what it is.

This ^ has been so cute I can hardly stand it...
Technically there's only one way to spell "denial"
Or you can just use a whole bunch of words to dance around it

This ^ has been so cute I can hardly stand it...
Technically there's only one way to spell "denial"
Or you can just use a whole bunch of words to dance around it

Read the article Kalm linked.

JohnStOnge wrote:

andy7171 wrote:Says the husband of the establishment.

As I've written before, my wife is not "establishment." She was recruited a few years back to run against the "establishment" candidate. She is a Ted Cruz supporter. Whatever you think of Cruz, he is not a favored son of the Republican Establishment.

In the context of the Republican Party, she is not "establishment" at all. She is "insurgent."

In any case, it is NOT just the Republican "establishment" that doesn't want Trump. An awful lot of people who have historically been referenced as being the Republican "base" that was viewed as so unruly don't want him either. And it's not just that they'd rather have some other candidate they favor. They DESPISE trump and absolutely will NOT support him in a general election.

I think anybody that takes a look at the conk campaign abortion will prefer the Donald over the Canadian-born Rafael Eduardo Cruz. The glaring difference between them is that Trump doesn't believe his own bullshit. Cruz is a psychopathic true-believer who is despised by 100% of both houses of Congress. If I were President I would sign an executive order making it a minor misdemeanor to kick him in the balls on sight.

JohnStOnge wrote:

andy7171 wrote:Says the husband of the establishment.

As I've written before, my wife is not "establishment." She was recruited a few years back to run against the "establishment" candidate. She is a Ted Cruz supporter. Whatever you think of Cruz, he is not a favored son of the Republican Establishment.

In the context of the Republican Party, she is not "establishment" at all. She is "insurgent."

In any case, it is NOT just the Republican "establishment" that doesn't want Trump. An awful lot of people who have historically been referenced as being the Republican "base" that was viewed as so unruly don't want him either. And it's not just that they'd rather have some other candidate they favor. They DESPISE trump and absolutely will NOT support him in a general election.

She supports a booger-eater.

houndawg wrote:
I think anybody that takes a look at the conk campaign abortion will prefer the Donald over the Canadian-born Rafael Eduardo Cruz. The glaring difference between them is that Trump doesn't believe his own bullshit. Cruz is a psychopathic true-believer who is despised by 100% of both houses of Congress. If I were President I would sign an executive order making it a minor misdemeanor to kick him in the balls on sight.

When you casually read the POLITIFACT cliffs notes on Ted Cruz its a calamitous red-ink disaster...
The guy wouldn't know the truth if it curled up and sat in his lap...



What Cruz did to Ben Carson - the campaign sabotage
was an unforgivable lie and exposed his true character

It's a new day, so let me get this straight...

Your wife was recruited by the local Republican Party to be an "insurgent"

You are completely and totally against Trump and Cruz.

AND you thin what Romney did and said was perfect and true.

...is that where we stand today?

andy7171 wrote:It's a new day, so let me get this straight...

Your wife was recruited by the local Republican Party to be an "insurgent"

You are completely and totally against Trump and Cruz.

AND you thin what Romney did and said was perfect and true.

...is that where we stand today?

So I finished the video and yes, she lays some serious wood. Still tough to listen to her speak though.