Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://gizmodo.com/now-jill-stein-think ... 1784664503

Looks like Gawker is in Hillary's pocket too

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Sounds like Chizz should be Jill's choice for head of the FCC.

Ivytalk wrote:Sounds like Chizz should be Jill's choice for head of the FCC.

Yeah. He surely can iron out the problems.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Sounds like Chizz should be Jill's choice for head of the FCC.

Yeah. He surely can iron out the problems.

Spoiler: show

Look,
She's batsh!t crazy and only going to get about 0.5% of the vote - I get that
The point isn't about her - she's harmless and largely irrelevant

it's about how bad the people are who actually get the remaining 99.5% of the votes are
But I deserve this

The only way to beat Shrillary is to force her to fight a two-front war. We can't do that with Stein dropping bombs on her own campaign instead of attacking Hillary.

Pwns wrote:The only way to beat Shrillary is to force her to fight a two-front war. We can't do that with Stein dropping bombs on her own campaign instead of attacking Hillary.

I completely agree...



But this tends to be the overwhelming problem with 3rd party candidates
They have a few great ideas and a pile of garbage behind the curtain

Chizzang wrote:

Pwns wrote:The only way to beat Shrillary is to force her to fight a two-front war. We can't do that with Stein dropping bombs on her own campaign instead of attacking Hillary.

I completely agree...



But this tends to be the overwhelming problem with 3rd party candidates
They have a few great ideas and a pile of garbage behind the curtain

If they were more mainstream candidates, they would be a part of the two major parties

Its a catch-22.

But their voices beed to be heard however.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Chizzang wrote:But this tends to be the overwhelming problem with 3rd party candidates
They have a few great ideas and a pile of garbage behind the curtain

89Hen wrote:

Chizzang wrote:But this tends to be the overwhelming problem with 3rd party candidates
They have a few great ideas and a pile of garbage behind the curtain

Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

kalm wrote:

89Hen wrote:

Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

They just throw it out for everyone to see and 99% of the population eats it up from one side or the other.

kalm wrote:

89Hen wrote:

Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

Different piles. I believe what Cleets is talking about is actual platform garbage in the case of the third party candidate. That's in addition to any personality or indiscretion garbage they may have on top of that.

If you're trying to paint me as a Trump or Clinton sympathizer, you're barking up the wrong tree.

clenz wrote:

kalm wrote:
Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

They just throw it out for everyone to see and 99% of the population eats it up from one side or the other.

This.

89Hen wrote:

kalm wrote:
Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

Different piles. I believe what Cleets is talking about is actual platform garbage in the case of the third party candidate. That's in addition to any personality or indiscretion garbage they may have on top of that.

If you're trying to paint me as a Trump or Clinton sympathizer, you're barking up the wrong tree.

Yup, That's ^ accurate
The Jill Stein's of the 3rd party world have some (some) fantastic ideas
And they have some - completely insane - poorly conceived - dangerously stupid - ideas

89Hen wrote:

kalm wrote:
Good thing there's no garbage behind the curtains of mainstream candidates!

Different piles. I believe what Cleets is talking about is actual platform garbage in the case of the third party candidate. That's in addition to any personality or indiscretion garbage they may have on top of that.

If you're trying to paint me as a Trump or Clinton sympathizer, you're barking up the wrong tree.

kalm:

Chizzang wrote:

89Hen wrote: Different piles. I believe what Cleets is talking about is actual platform garbage in the case of the third party candidate. That's in addition to any personality or indiscretion garbage they may have on top of that.

If you're trying to paint me as a Trump or Clinton sympathizer, you're barking up the wrong tree.

Yup, That's ^ accurate
The Jill Stein's of the 3rd party world have some (some) fantastic ideas
And they have some - completely insane - poorly conceived - dangerously stupid - ideas

Is regulation of wifi signals around children a part of the GP platform? (Never mind...it might actually be! )

I didn't say 3rd parties didn't have their share of lunacy but I guess I'm becoming less and less a fan of the prevailing wisdom. Prevailing wisdom brought us insane deregulation of banks, war in Iraq, prohibition of drugs, reliance on Middle East oil, etc.

kalm wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Yup, That's ^ accurate
The Jill Stein's of the 3rd party world have some (some) fantastic ideas
And they have some - completely insane - poorly conceived - dangerously stupid - ideas

Is regulation of wifi signals around children a part of the GP platform? (Never mind...it might actually be! )

I didn't say 3rd parties didn't have their share of lunacy but I guess I'm becoming less and less a fan of the prevailing wisdom. Prevailing wisdom brought us insane deregulation of banks, war in Iraq, prohibition of drugs, reliance on Middle East oil, etc.

American Political "Prevailing Wisdom" is entirely about MONEY...
Every single point you make ^ there is ultimately about MONEY

Chizzang wrote:

kalm wrote:
Is regulation of wifi signals around children a part of the GP platform? (Never mind...it might actually be! )

I didn't say 3rd parties didn't have their share of lunacy but I guess I'm becoming less and less a fan of the prevailing wisdom. Prevailing wisdom brought us insane deregulation of banks, war in Iraq, prohibition of drugs, reliance on Middle East oil, etc.

American Political "Prevailing Wisdom" is entirely about MONEY...
Every single point you make ^ there is ultimately about MONEY

And can't money drive some "completely insane, poorly conceived, and dangerously stupid" policies?

kalm wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

American Political "Prevailing Wisdom" is entirely about MONEY...
Every single point you make ^ there is ultimately about MONEY

And can't money drive some "completely insane, poorly conceived, and dangerously stupid" policies?

*Love