Page 1 of 1

Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:16 am
by ALPHAGRIZ1

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:25 pm
by Ivytalk
I remember an old Clinton video game from the early 90s where Bill Clinton gobbled hamburgers and tried to avoid the knives and skillets that Hildabitch threw at him. Good stuff!

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:04 pm
by JohnStOnge
I actually don't think that is a particularly effective ad. But we'll see.

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:42 am
by andy7171
JohnStOnge wrote:I actually don't think that is a particularly effective ad. But we'll see.
I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:54 am
by JohnStOnge
andy7171 wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:I actually don't think that is a particularly effective ad. But we'll see.
I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.

That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."

Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.

As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on.

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:56 am
by andy7171
JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.

That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."

Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.

As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on, and that's who I'm voting for.
FIFY

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:06 am
by Ivytalk
JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.

That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."

Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.

As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on.
I saw the video. She said "are." If she had said "aren't," the proper conjunction would have been "but." But she used "and."

You're worse than Josh Earnest. :thumbdown:

Re: Ms Pac-Man

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:16 am
by ALPHAGRIZ1
JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.

That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."

Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.

As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on.

Psssst, shes lying to you!

You see........shes rich, and she is telling the stupid middle class and poor what they want to hear about the evil rich people for votes. She is praying on class warfare and rallying her base, poor people and illegals. She knows she can steal from the people her and her Wall Street buddies took 5 trillion dollars from we the people and nothing happened so she just gonna do it again this time in the form of taxes.

What she is doing is called......lying.......she does that in her free time when she isnt killing people that cross her.



Good on you for supporting that! Merica!