Ms Pac-Man
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:16 am
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=45991
I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.JohnStOnge wrote:I actually don't think that is a particularly effective ad. But we'll see.
She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.andy7171 wrote:I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.JohnStOnge wrote:I actually don't think that is a particularly effective ad. But we'll see.
FIFYJohnStOnge wrote:She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."
Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.
As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on, and that's who I'm voting for.
I saw the video. She said "are." If she had said "aren't," the proper conjunction would have been "but." But she used "and."JohnStOnge wrote:She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."
Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.
As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on.
JohnStOnge wrote:She didn't say she is going to raise taxes the middle class. I heard the statement in context. She said they're going to fund infrastructure by soaking the rich. Making them pay their "fair share." Then she said "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class.andy7171 wrote: I'm guessing we're at the point where JSO would be the one cheering Hillary raising taxes on the middle class.
That's what I thought when I heard it the first time. Then I saw the video that's been going around with it being said she used the word "are." Couldn't really tell from the video. Then later I saw it reported that she said "aren't." The point of the reporting was criticizing the Trump campaign for...shocker...lying by saying she said "are" when she said "aren't."
Now, she MAY raise taxes on the middle class. Who knows. But she hasn't said she would and that's clearly not how she's presenting her plans. She's very clearly presenting a "soak the rich" plan.
As you know I don't agree with the "soak the rich" approach. But that's the approach she's running on.