Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Trump voters, your doofus candidate is going to lose big to someone with these dismal numbers. Thanks a lot.

Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

93henfan wrote:Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

They tried, and got completely mud stomped.

@ establishment conks.

SDHornet wrote:

93henfan wrote:Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

They tried, and got completely mud stomped.

@ establishment conks.

Their boy Bush was one of the first to quit. He was supposed to be an establishment shoe-in. I've never seen such a pathetic pussy of a man run for President since Michael Dukakis.

93henfan wrote:Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

This. All these Republicans like JSO that complain about Trump never blame the party for allowing 1) a field of 18 to exist in the first place and 2) people that have no shot to run. At least the Democrats don't crowd the field with people that have no chance. Ben Carson could not have honestly expected that he would have made it to the convention.

Ibanez wrote:

93henfan wrote:Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

This. All these Republicans like JSO that complain about Trump never blame the party for allowing 1) a field of 18 to exist in the first place and 2) people that have no shot to run. At least the Democrats don't crowd the field with people that have no chance. Ben Carson could not have honestly expected that he would have made it to the convention.

Dude believes the world is 6,000 years old, why would he have any trouble believing that?

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote: This. All these Republicans like JSO that complain about Trump never blame the party for allowing 1) a field of 18 to exist in the first place and 2) people that have no shot to run. At least the Democrats don't crowd the field with people that have no chance. Ben Carson could not have honestly expected that he would have made it to the convention.

Dude believes the world is 6,000 years old, why would he have any trouble believing that?

It'd be nice if they'd add a digit each year, I can't keep track. The world has been 6,000 yrs old for a few years now.

6,930 to be exact.

Ibanez wrote:

93henfan wrote:Non-Trump voters, why didn't you vote your doofus in then if they were better?

This. All these Republicans like JSO that complain about Trump never blame the party for allowing 1) a field of 18 to exist in the first place and 2) people that have no shot to run. At least the Democrats don't crowd the field with people that have no chance. Ben Carson could not have honestly expected that he would have made it to the convention.

Ben Carson started like Obama. Gave one good speech and suddenly he was Mr. Wonderful. Except Obama was able to convince enough fools on his hope and change bullshit that he got elected.

2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

I'm not sure there was any GOP candidate who would've beaten Obama in '08 - the Bush years were clearly a drag on the ticket, Obama ran a great campaign with the Hope and the Change, and he was clearly a super viable minority candidate and that certainly resonated with the voters. Same with '12, although you take out the hope and change and you insert the incumbency factor. This is really the only year in the past three elections where the GOP has really had a chance against the Democratic choice and sent up a really bad candidate.

GannonFan wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

I'm not sure there was any GOP candidate who would've beaten Obama in '08 - the Bush years were clearly a drag on the ticket, Obama ran a great campaign with the Hope and the Change, and he was clearly a super viable minority candidate and that certainly resonated with the voters. Same with '12, although you take out the hope and change and you insert the incumbency factor. This is really the only year in the past three elections where the GOP has really had a chance against the Democratic choice and sent up a really bad candidate.

I don't think the GOP really wants to win this election any more than Trump does. Having to actually do something other than whimper about the donks is obviously much beyond their capabilities. They have a 57% majority in the House of Representatives, they have a 54% majority in the Senate, they have 60% of the state governorships, the have complete control over 60% of State legislatures, they have complete or shared control over 74% of State legislatures, and until Scalia croaked in the company of his catamite they had the SCOTUS! But all they can do is fvck up with metronomic regularity and blame it on "that niqqer in the White House".

They're so unbelievably incompetent that they managed to devise a strategy to lose to the nation's most hated politician in an election that should have been a walk over for the Republicans. That's how stupid these squats are.

houndawg wrote:

GannonFan wrote:
I'm not sure there was any GOP candidate who would've beaten Obama in '08 - the Bush years were clearly a drag on the ticket, Obama ran a great campaign with the Hope and the Change, and he was clearly a super viable minority candidate and that certainly resonated with the voters. Same with '12, although you take out the hope and change and you insert the incumbency factor. This is really the only year in the past three elections where the GOP has really had a chance against the Democratic choice and sent up a really bad candidate.

I don't think the GOP really wants to win this election any more than Trump does. Having to actually do something other than whimper about the donks is obviously much beyond their capabilities. They have a 57% majority in the House of Representatives, they have a 54% majority in the Senate, they have 60% of the state governorships, the have complete control over 60% of State legislatures, they have complete or shared control over 74% of State legislatures, and until Scalia croaked in the company of his catamite they had the SCOTUS! But all they can do is fvck up with metronomic regularity and blame it on "that niqqer in the White House".

They're so unbelievably incompetent that they managed to devise a strategy to lose to the nation's most hated politician in an election that should have been a walk over for the Republicans. That's how stupid these squats are.

What the hell are you talking about? Reading National Enquirer again? By the way, nimrod, you are fond of quoting yourself from thread to thread. Good way to spread the intellectual flatulence around.

HD, how about a link on the Scalia gay lover bombshell? Sounds hilarious, but this is the first I've heard of it. Source?

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

"the mormon" quip is weak

Romney was a pretty good candidate - he'd be killing Clinton right now if not for the kamikaze GOP primary voters in this cycle

oh - if he had run in the first place. I like that he didn't. He's the only person in the GOP right now with any dignity


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ivytalk wrote:

houndawg wrote:
I don't think the GOP really wants to win this election any more than Trump does. Having to actually do something other than whimper about the donks is obviously much beyond their capabilities. They have a 57% majority in the House of Representatives, they have a 54% majority in the Senate, they have 60% of the state governorships, the have complete control over 60% of State legislatures, they have complete or shared control over 74% of State legislatures, and until Scalia croaked in the company of his catamite they had the SCOTUS! But all they can do is fvck up with metronomic regularity and blame it on "that niqqer in the White House".

They're so unbelievably incompetent that they managed to devise a strategy to lose to the nation's most hated politician in an election that should have been a walk over for the Republicans. That's how stupid these squats are.

What the hell are you talking about? Reading National Enquirer again? By the way, nimrod, you are fond of quoting yourself from thread to thread. Good way to spread the intellectual flatulence around.

Don't throw the baby out with the bath water...conks control all those legislative bodies and governorships but we need to make America great again!

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

2008: Palin was a factor. She was a horrible choice but I also believe people didn't want 4(8) more years of a continuation of Bush policies. Which, they got with Obama.

93henfan wrote:HD, how about a link on the Scalia gay lover bombshell? Sounds hilarious, but this is the first I've heard of it. Source?

It was pillow talk. You know how dbj gets after a few cosmos.

Ibanez wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

2008: Palin was a factor. She was a horrible choice but I also believe people didn't want 4(8) more years of a continuation of Bush policies. Which, they got with Obama.

Really? Obama continued the Bush policies??

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

Voter fraud

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Wedgebuster wrote:

Ibanez wrote: 2008: Palin was a factor. She was a horrible choice but I also believe people didn't want 4(8) more years of a continuation of Bush policies. Which, they got with Obama.

Really? Obama continued the Bush policies??

He absolutely did, doubled down in some cases.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

I'm just going to leave this here.

CID1990 wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:2008, the year of the Palin,
2012, the year of the Mormon
2016, Trump..

Wondering why the GOP has been losing elections?

"the mormon" quip is weak

Romney was a pretty good candidate - he'd be killing Clinton right now if not for the kamikaze GOP primary voters in this cycle

oh - if he had run in the first place. I like that he didn't. He's the only person in the GOP right now with any dignity

This ^ sounds familiar..
I remember when the Republican brain trust announced that Romney would win in a LANDSLIDE
and that's the word that was used

I see you're still riding that purple unicorn and frankly I find that adorable

kalm wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:
What the hell are you talking about? Reading National Enquirer again? By the way, nimrod, you are fond of quoting yourself from thread to thread. Good way to spread the intellectual flatulence around.

Don't throw the baby out with the bath water...conks control all those legislative bodies and governorships but we need to make America great again!

You can't make this shit up. When Ivytalk calls you "nimrod" you know you're right...

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
"the mormon" quip is weak

Romney was a pretty good candidate - he'd be killing Clinton right now if not for the kamikaze GOP primary voters in this cycle

oh - if he had run in the first place. I like that he didn't. He's the only person in the GOP right now with any dignity

This ^ sounds familiar..
I remember when the Republican brain trust announced that Romney would win in a LANDSLIDE
and that's the word that was used

I see you're still riding that purple unicorn and frankly I find that adorable

what is wrong with you lately - you miss the most obvious points

I'm responding to the idea that the GOP has put forth whacko candidates for the last three cycles - the argument is valid with Palin and Trump, but WB then has to stick "The Mormon" in there as if to suggest Romney was somehow comparable to the other two, and he most certainly was not. He was a viable candidate - that's it.

jesus are you even you?

password check on clitz