Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

After JSO's latest posts in the Trump vs. Clinton thread, it has come to light that he is either the best troll or a complete idiot.

Either way, he can't be taken seriously.

I'm still leaning towards JSO and Superhornet being trolls extraordinaire.

kalm wrote:I'm still leaning towards JSO and Superhornet being trolls extraordinaire.

I think both are D1B and I have for some time

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

kalm wrote:I'm still leaning towards JSO and Superhornet being trolls extraordinaire.

I think both are D1B and I have for some time

You're just jelly.

JSO is no idiot...
He might be a lot of things but idiot ain't one of them

kalm wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
I think both are D1B and I have for some time

You're just jelly.

Nuh ah

Chizzang wrote:JSO is no idiot...
He might be a lot of things but idiot ain't one of them

I agree. I think he actually dislikes Hillary so he goes over the top to justify supporting her. Maybe convincing or fooling himself.

I believe it was JSO who said "It's okay to put peanut butter on your balls and have your dog lick it off because it's YOUR dog"
Yeah, the guy may come off as intelligent at times, but he certainly comes off as an idiot at times as well by not keeping his mouth shut concerning his personal desires

bandl wrote:I believe it was JSO who said "It's okay to put peanut butter on your balls and have your dog lick it off because it's YOUR dog"
Yeah, the guy may come off as intelligent at times, but he certainly comes off as an idiot at times as well by not keeping his mouth shut concerning his personal desires

LAWL I had forgotten about that

btw is it better to use a small dog or a large one? id be afraid a large one would actually chomp down on a nugget


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chizzang wrote:JSO is no idiot...
He might be a lot of things but idiot ain't one of them

That's idiotic.

JSO is a pussy. Plain and simple.
In fact, I think he is a she and her name is Joanne, not John.
Think about it. Has he/she said anything masculine?
Has he/she at anything, ever?
Trust me, he is a she.

CAA Flagship wrote:JSO is a pussy. Plain and simple.
In fact, I think he is a she and her name is Joanne, not John.
Think about it. Has he/she said anything masculine?
Has he/she at anything, ever?
Trust me, he is a she.

If there's anyone on this board (besides WTAG) who I'd trust to know what it's like to be a he->she or a she->he, it's you.

bandl wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:JSO is a pussy. Plain and simple.
In fact, I think he is a she and her name is Joanne, not John.
Think about it. Has he/she said anything masculine?
Has he/she at anything, ever?
Trust me, he is a she.

If there's anyone on this board (besides WTAG) who I'd trust to know what it's like to be a he->she or a she->he, it's you.

Thanks. It's good to see that hard work and experience is recognized. Now, if you will excuse me, I have to get back to vacuuming.

Either way he gets a lot of attention.

Maybe that answers the questions

OL FU wrote:Either way he gets a lot of attention.

Maybe that answers the questions

have you noticed that Brokebackjon kinda disappeared right around the same time JSO started going crazy about trump?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

bandl wrote:I believe it was JSO who said "It's okay to put peanut butter on your balls and have your dog lick it off because it's YOUR dog"
Yeah, the guy may come off as intelligent at times, but he certainly comes off as an idiot at times as well by not keeping his mouth shut concerning his personal desires

LAWL I had forgotten about that

btw is it better to use a small dog or a large one? id be afraid a large one would actually chomp down on a nugget


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*asking for a friend

Grizalltheway wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
LAWL I had forgotten about that

btw is it better to use a small dog or a large one? id be afraid a large one would actually chomp down on a nugget


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*asking for a friend

Gordon Setters have soft mouths.

kalm wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
*asking for a friend

Gordon Setters have soft mouths.

* or so I'm told

kalm wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
*asking for a friend

Gordon Setters have soft mouths.

Their crotch biters like Irish Setters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Gordon Setters have soft mouths.

Their crotch biters like Irish Setters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Their crotch biters like Irish Setters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From the hills Thar

OL FU wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
*there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From the hills Thar

The hills have Is...or at least one.

Depends on what you mean by "troll". If by that you mean someone with an unpopular opinion that can stir the pot then yes. Some of his unpopular opinions are right, though, and for some that might disqualify anyone as a "troll".

Examples:

1. It's BS to equate a 40-year-old dude banging a 16 year old girl to rape or to some Jerry Sandusky that molests prepubescent kids. Age-of-consent-laws are silly magic numbers with no real biological significance. That doesn't mean you have to legally allow any kind of sexual relationship, but age-of-consent laws are another form of banning sexual relationships that lawmakers and society deem "icky".

2. DUI laws don't keep us safer and might be making us less safe. The data speaks for itself. The criteria for assessing if someone is driving impaired needs to change.

3. Don't know if I agree on animal cruelty laws, but he's probably more consistent than a lot of people that want different standards for different animals depending on how cool or majestic or fluffy and cute they are.

4. Don't agree with him on race and IQ, but to me it seems hard to reconcile Godless physicalism with genetic equivalence of all races and nationalities with everything that's known about human genomics and the genetics of race.

5. Dogma probably has influenced research on homosexuality, but I don't think it's relevant to same-sex marriage or gay adoptions or anything like that.

He's the loquacious, message-board iconclast.

Pwns wrote:Depends on what you mean by "troll". If by that you mean someone with an unpopular opinion that can stir the pot then yes. Some of his unpopular opinions are right, though, and for some that might disqualify anyone as a "troll".

Examples:

1. It's BS to equate a 40-year-old dude banging a 16 year old girl to rape or to some Jerry Sandusky that molests prepubescent kids. Age-of-consent-laws are silly magic numbers with no real biological significance. That doesn't mean you have to legally allow any kind of sexual relationship, but age-of-consent laws are another form of banning sexual relationships that lawmakers and society deem "icky".

2. DUI laws don't keep us safer and might be making us less safe. The data speaks for itself. The criteria for assessing if someone is driving impaired needs to change.

3. Don't know if I agree on animal cruelty laws, but he's probably more consistent than a lot of people that want different standards for different animals depending on how cool or majestic or fluffy and cute they are.

4. Don't agree with him on race and IQ, but to me it seems hard to reconcile Godless physicalism with genetic equivalence of all races and nationalities with everything that's known about human genomics and the genetics of race.

5. Dogma probably has influenced research on homosexuality, but I don't think it's relevant to same-sex marriage or gay adoptions or anything like that.

He's the loquacious, message-board iconclast.

Honestly I find the guy fascinating as hell... for all the reasons ^ you post above
The cherry on top for me is this:
He's married to a fundamentalist
So he embraces the illogical mumbo jumbo and washes it down with "I'm agnostic"

Yet,
He staunchly defends pure logic as if it existed in any real way and he is somehow "tapped into it"

CID1990 wrote:

bandl wrote:I believe it was JSO who said "It's okay to put peanut butter on your balls and have your dog lick it off because it's YOUR dog"
Yeah, the guy may come off as intelligent at times, but he certainly comes off as an idiot at times as well by not keeping his mouth shut concerning his personal desires

LAWL I had forgotten about that

btw is it better to use a small dog or a large one? id be afraid a large one would actually chomp down on a nugget


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd suggest the bigger question is creamy pb vs. crunchy...