Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf told the Senate Banking Committee he was "deeply sorry" Tuesday over allegations the bank opened millions of accounts without customers' permission in order to meet aggressive sales quotas.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren was having none of it.

The Massachusetts senator has built a reputation for being tough on shady Wall Street dealings and the executives she believes are responsible. But she took it to the next level with Stumpf.

"OK, so you haven't resigned. You haven't returned a single nickel of your personal earnings. You haven't fired a single senior executive," Warren said. "Instead, evidently, your definition of accountable is to push the blame to your low-level employees who don't have the money for a fancy P.R. firm to defend themselves. It's gutless leadership."

Chizzang wrote:If she was Anti-Abortion and Christian
she would be 50 days away from being president of this country

89Hen wrote:What's a hyocrite?

93henfan wrote:

89Hen wrote:What's a hyocrite?

Wasn't he a doctor in Ancient Greece?

SDHornet wrote:

Chizzang wrote:If she was Anti-Abortion and Christian
she would be 50 days away from being president of this country

Not likely. The MSM would have a field day trashing her (like they do everyone else) that has those principles/morals in their platform.

Nice try, but I expect better from you.

Chizzang wrote:

SDHornet wrote: Not likely. The MSM would have a field day trashing her (like they do everyone else) that has those principles/morals in their platform.

Nice try, but I expect better from you.

I'll slow it down for you...
She's a tough talking no nonsense blah blah blah who calls it like she see's it etc. etc.

This very same "pseudo character" described above in an orange wig and fake tan
is half way to the White House

Trump with less intellect and less savvy than Warren is making that whole thing work

Cluck U wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
I'll slow it down for you...
She's a tough talking no nonsense blah blah blah who calls it like she see's it etc. etc.

This very same "pseudo character" described above in an orange wig and fake tan
is half way to the White House

Trump with less intellect and less savvy than Warren is making that whole thing work

I'll slow it down for you...you failed miserably (just like Warren).

Chizzang wrote:

Cluck U wrote:
I'll slow it down for you...you failed miserably (just like Warren).

Um... Hmmm...
She's a mirror image of everything Republicans claim to love
Except she's a Liberal

Chizzang wrote:

SDHornet wrote: Not likely. The MSM would have a field day trashing her (like they do everyone else) that has those principles/morals in their platform.

Nice try, but I expect better from you.

I'll slow it down for you...
She's a tough talking no nonsense blah blah blah who calls it like she see's it etc. etc.

This very same "pseudo character" described above in an orange wig and fake tan
is half way to the White House

Trump with less intellect and less savvy than Warren is making that whole thing work
50% of America is stupid enough to fall in love

Pwns wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
I'll slow it down for you...
She's a tough talking no nonsense blah blah blah who calls it like she see's it etc. etc.

This very same "pseudo character" described above in an orange wig and fake tan
is half way to the White House

Trump with less intellect and less savvy than Warren is making that whole thing work
50% of America is stupid enough to fall in love

Not enough to a straight talker to skewer Hilldog, though.

I could give Warren a pass for supporting Hillary Clinton if she made it clear the point was to defeat Donald Trump and that she thinks Clinton is just another Wall Street-backed candidate who's not going to go against the big financial institutions that are 100% behind her. That's what a progressive tough talker would do.

She needs to be more unenthusiastic about her support for Hillary Clinton. Otherwise you have no credibility as a straight talker.

Chizzang wrote:

Pwns wrote:
Not enough to a straight talker to skewer Hilldog, though.

I could give Warren a pass for supporting Hillary Clinton if she made it clear the point was to defeat Donald Trump and that she thinks Clinton is just another Wall Street-backed candidate who's not going to go against the big financial institutions that are 100% behind her. That's what a progressive tough talker would do.

She needs to be more unenthusiastic about her support for Hillary Clinton. Otherwise you have no credibility as a straight talker.

Agreed,
However if Trump has proven anything, he's proven that authenticity isn't very important



It just has to be delivered with attitude
it need not be substantive or authentic or even true

Chizzang wrote:

Pwns wrote:
Not enough to a straight talker to skewer Hilldog, though.

I could give Warren a pass for supporting Hillary Clinton if she made it clear the point was to defeat Donald Trump and that she thinks Clinton is just another Wall Street-backed candidate who's not going to go against the big financial institutions that are 100% behind her. That's what a progressive tough talker would do.

She needs to be more unenthusiastic about her support for Hillary Clinton. Otherwise you have no credibility as a straight talker.

Agreed,
However if Trump has proven anything, he's proven that authenticity isn't very important



It just has to be delivered with attitude
it need not be substantive or authentic or even true

CAA Flagship wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Agreed,
However if Trump has proven anything, he's proven that authenticity isn't very important



It just has to be delivered with attitude
it need not be substantive or authentic or even true

But that tactic was not a viable option in the past. But Obama made it possible.

Chizzang wrote:If she was Anti-Abortion and Christian
she would be 50 days away from being president of this country

Chizzang wrote:

Pwns wrote:
Not enough to a straight talker to skewer Hilldog, though.

I could give Warren a pass for supporting Hillary Clinton if she made it clear the point was to defeat Donald Trump and that she thinks Clinton is just another Wall Street-backed candidate who's not going to go against the big financial institutions that are 100% behind her. That's what a progressive tough talker would do.

She needs to be more unenthusiastic about her support for Hillary Clinton. Otherwise you have no credibility as a straight talker.

Agreed,
However if Trump has proven anything, he's proven that authenticity isn't very important



It just has to be delivered with attitude
it need not be substantive or authentic or even true

89Hen wrote:What's a hyocrite?