Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

In effect, what Band was doing, as the NYT's Nick Confessore summarized, "was selling his clients on idea that giving to foundation was, in essence, a way to bolster their influence. Clinton & Band built a platform for executives to bolster their companies' images, bathe in BC's praise, and do some good, while Teneo extracted earnings for Band and, depending on what you see in these e-mails, Clinton himself. Teneo paid Clinton until late '11."

As Confessore also pointed out, "I guess you can wave it all off as a nothingburger. But Chelsea Clinton and some of Clinton's other aides were clearly freaking out."

And he concluded by saying "Generally, the emails show Clinton's *own closest aides* troubled or horrified by things that her surrogates have spent years waving off."



Today, with this context, we focus on one particular email disclosed in the latest Podesta email release, in which an email from Doug Band to Cheryl Mills and John Podesta dated November 12, 2011, or just days before the abovementioned memo was sent out, admits that "I'm starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed."

Here is the full email:

Need get this asap to them although I'm sure cvc [Chelsea Clinton] won't believe it to be true bc she doesn't want to Even though the facts speak for themselves.

John, I would appreciate your feedback and any suggestions I'm also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed. Dk [Declan Kelly] and I built a business. 65 people work for us who have wives and husbands and kids, they all depend on us. Our business has almost nothing to do with the clintons, the foundation or cgi in any way. The chairman of ubs could care a less about cgi. Our fund clients who we do restructuring and m and a advising the same just as bhp nor tivo do. These are real companies who we provide real advice to through very serious people. Comm head for goldman, dep press secretary to bloomberg, former head of banking, and his team, from morgan stanley for asia and latin am.

I realize it is difficult to confront and reason with her but this could go to far and then we all will have a real serious set of other problems. I don't deserve this from her and deserve a tad more respect or at least a direct dialogue for me to explain these things. She is acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she's doing because she, as she has said, hasn't found her way and has a lack of focus in her life. I realize she will be off of this soon but if it doesn't come soon enough...
Four years later, the story is out, not thanks to Chelsea Clinton as Doug Band was concerned, but due to a hack of John Podesta's email account.

However, in light of the latest FBI scandal involving Anthony Weiner, It remains to be seen if either Band or the Clintons are screwed - it appears that the general public has more than enough distractions to forget about this potential graft scandal involving the Clintons and their influence-peddling clients.

kalm wrote:The Clinton team was freaked out about this stuff getting out. It only takes a little digging to realize that the Clintons are no different and as corrupt as Trump. He leveraged his daddy's fortune and they leveraged their political power. Sad you are not willing to look even a little into their activities.

Or you're still a terrific troll.

In effect, what Band was doing, as the NYT's Nick Confessore summarized, "was selling his clients on idea that giving to foundation was, in essence, a way to bolster their influence. Clinton & Band built a platform for executives to bolster their companies' images, bathe in BC's praise, and do some good, while Teneo extracted earnings for Band and, depending on what you see in these e-mails, Clinton himself. Teneo paid Clinton until late '11."

As Confessore also pointed out, "I guess you can wave it all off as a nothingburger. But Chelsea Clinton and some of Clinton's other aides were clearly freaking out."

And he concluded by saying "Generally, the emails show Clinton's *own closest aides* troubled or horrified by things that her surrogates have spent years waving off."



Today, with this context, we focus on one particular email disclosed in the latest Podesta email release, in which an email from Doug Band to Cheryl Mills and John Podesta dated November 12, 2011, or just days before the abovementioned memo was sent out, admits that "I'm starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed."

Here is the full email:

Need get this asap to them although I'm sure cvc [Chelsea Clinton] won't believe it to be true bc she doesn't want to Even though the facts speak for themselves.

John, I would appreciate your feedback and any suggestions I'm also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed. Dk [Declan Kelly] and I built a business. 65 people work for us who have wives and husbands and kids, they all depend on us. Our business has almost nothing to do with the clintons, the foundation or cgi in any way. The chairman of ubs could care a less about cgi. Our fund clients who we do restructuring and m and a advising the same just as bhp nor tivo do. These are real companies who we provide real advice to through very serious people. Comm head for goldman, dep press secretary to bloomberg, former head of banking, and his team, from morgan stanley for asia and latin am.

I realize it is difficult to confront and reason with her but this could go to far and then we all will have a real serious set of other problems. I don't deserve this from her and deserve a tad more respect or at least a direct dialogue for me to explain these things. She is acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she's doing because she, as she has said, hasn't found her way and has a lack of focus in her life. I realize she will be off of this soon but if it doesn't come soon enough...
Four years later, the story is out, not thanks to Chelsea Clinton as Doug Band was concerned, but due to a hack of John Podesta's email account.

However, in light of the latest FBI scandal involving Anthony Weiner, It remains to be seen if either Band or the Clintons are screwed - it appears that the general public has more than enough distractions to forget about this potential graft scandal involving the Clintons and their influence-peddling clients.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-3 ... re-screwed

Cluck U wrote:No response from JSO.

Surprise.

Ibanez wrote:From what I've read and heard, Chelsea seems to be the only person in that family with scruples.

ASUG8 wrote:

Ibanez wrote:From what I've read and heard, Chelsea seems to be the only person in that family with scruples.

Can't be....100% of her pooled DNA was scruple-free.

Ibanez wrote:From what I've read and heard, Chelsea seems to be the only person in that family with scruples.

Ivytalk wrote:

Ibanez wrote:From what I've read and heard, Chelsea seems to be the only person in that family with scruples.

What have you read, and from whom have you heard? My sources tell me she's a whiny little spoiled beyotch.

Or was that just ?

Spoiler: show

I know nothing about Chelsea. She could honestly be nothing like her parents. Or like Uncle Roger.

SDHornet wrote:Here you go JSO, let a fellow leftists spell it out for you:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApcqXijVzYU[/youtube]

Pay for play. Anyone thinking otherwise is completely delusional.

Not sure if hilldog will get dinged, but there will be people going down for this.

kalm wrote:The Clinton team was freaked out about this stuff getting out. It only takes a little digging to realize that the Clintons are no different and as corrupt as Trump. He leveraged his daddy's fortune and they leveraged their political power. Sad you are not willing to look even a little into their activities.

Chizzang wrote:Trump wears his dishonesty like a pride banner
Clinton furiously tries to sweep hers under the rug

And $3.00 gets you a cup of coffee at Starbucks - Pick your poison

Chizzang wrote:Trump wears his dishonesty like a pride banner
Clinton furiously tries to sweep hers under the rug

And $3.00 gets you a cup of coffee at Starbucks - Pick your poison

CAA Flagship wrote:

Chizzang wrote:Trump wears his dishonesty like a pride banner
Clinton furiously tries to sweep hers under the rug

And $3.00 gets you a cup of coffee at Starbucks - Pick your poison

Time out.

I need a ruling on the cost of coffee at Starbucks.

Ibanez wrote:

Chizzang wrote:Trump wears his dishonesty like a pride banner
Clinton furiously tries to sweep hers under the rug

And $3.00 gets you a cup of coffee at Starbucks - Pick your poison

$3?! That's some inflation, son. Venti coffee is $2.65 (tax including).

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
$3?! That's some inflation, son. Venti coffee is $2.65 (tax including).

They charge Cleets extra for being a pompous douche.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
$3?! That's some inflation, son. Venti coffee is $2.65 (tax including).

They charge Cleets extra for being a pompous douche.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
$3?! That's some inflation, son. Venti coffee is $2.65 (tax including).

They charge Cleets extra for being a pompous douche.

Ibanez wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Time out.

I need a ruling on the cost of coffee at Starbucks.

$2.65 on the EC(b), CLT Vector

Chizzang wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
They charge Cleets extra for being a pompous douche.

Douche Tax:
It's a heinous additional fee but I do pay it with pride...

bandl wrote:

Ibanez wrote: $2.65 on the EC(b), CLT Vector

Starbucks Prices
Food Size Price
Freshly Brewed Coffee Tall $1.85
Freshly Brewed Coffee Grande $2.10
Freshly Brewed Coffee Venti $2.45

Not sure what it costs to add in some extra gay/foofoo shit.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Douche Tax:
It's a heinous additional fee but I do pay it with pride...

What's the cost after you add in the "smug prick" fees?