Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Why do they set themselves up here and everywhere for such brutal beatdowns? Are they old fashioned? Blind? Mean? Cold-hearted? All of the above?

God, am I glad I'm a Progressive Liberal. The alternative is just wrong.








***********************

OK, Cap'n, I'll bite. The old dude with the sign reminds me of Harrison Ford with progeria. And Miss World Cankles looks like Delta Burke on the sixth month of a Weightwatchers plan.

First, I'VE got bigger boobs than she does.

Second, we don't set ourselves up for beatdowns...only a DONK would feel that arguing from emotion beats a fact based discussion.

Now, go back to your self congratulatory mode.

So come with me, Joe, where dreams are born, and time is never planned. Just think of happy things, and your heart will fly on wings, forever, in Never Never Land!

wideright82 wrote:

So come with me, Joe, where dreams are born, and time is never planned. Just think of happy things, and your heart will fly on wings, forever, in Never Never Land!

Well widewrong82 nailed one major problem with conks: they are pessimists. Liberals are hopeful for a better world. Liberal believe people and things can and do change for the better. Liberals typically search for the good in people and things, first.

Conks on the other hand are fearful of change and waste efforts trying to ensure that things remain in a permanent state of stagnation. Conks only see the bad in people which is why they're racist, harbor gun fetishes and worship the military. Conks are hardcore christians, therefore they instictively believe man was born bad and that the future on earth is doomed.

D1B wrote:

wideright82 wrote:

So come with me, Joe, where dreams are born, and time is never planned. Just think of happy things, and your heart will fly on wings, forever, in Never Never Land!

Well widewrong82 nailed one major problem with conks: they are pessimists. Liberals are hopeful for a better world. Liberal believe people and things can and do change for the better. Liberals typically search for the good in people and things, first.

.

So you are really a closet conk

AZGrizFan wrote:First, I'VE got bigger boobs than she does.

Second, we don't set ourselves up for beatdowns...only a DONK would feel that arguing from emotion beats a fact based discussion.

Now, go back to your self congratulatory mode.

"Hmmmm. Let's see, let's see, let's see. Looking for fact-based sh*t Z's been involved with in the last year........Nope, not there. Not there, either. Here he tries to use humor, but just ends up smug, so no facts there. Hmmmmmm."

D1B wrote:Well widewrong82 nailed one major problem with conks: they are pessimists. Liberals are hopeful for a better world. Liberal believe people and things can and do change for the better. Liberals typically search for the good in people and things, first.

Conks on the other hand are fearful of change and waste efforts trying to ensure that things remain in a permanent state of stagnation. Conks only see the bad in people which is why they're racist, harbor gun fetishes and worship the military. Conks are hardcore christians, therefore they instictively believe man was born bad and that the future on earth is doomed.

I don't think there is a difference. Both Donks and Conks are Pessimists, optimists, hopeful, believe in change, fear of change, stagnate, progressive, religious. People like Rush Limbaugh like to make people seem different, bringing hate and discount into the world, and have a good time doing it, then go home and relax amoungst the sex and drugs.

D1B wrote:

wideright82 wrote:

So come with me, Joe, where dreams are born, and time is never planned. Just think of happy things, and your heart will fly on wings, forever, in Never Never Land!

Well widewrong82 nailed one major problem with conks: they are pessimists. Liberals are hopeful for a better world. Liberal believe people and things can and do change for the better. Liberals typically search for the good in people and things, first.

Conks on the other hand are fearful of change and waste efforts trying to ensure that things remain in a permanent state of stagnation. Conks only see the bad in people which is why they're racist, harbor gun fetishes and worship the military. Conks are hardcore christians, therefore they instictively believe man was born bad and that the future on earth is doomed.

My name does lend itself quite nicely to that doesn't it?

Gil Dobie wrote:

D1B wrote:Well widewrong82 nailed one major problem with conks: they are pessimists. Liberals are hopeful for a better world. Liberal believe people and things can and do change for the better. Liberals typically search for the good in people and things, first.

Conks on the other hand are fearful of change and waste efforts trying to ensure that things remain in a permanent state of stagnation. Conks only see the bad in people which is why they're racist, harbor gun fetishes and worship the military. Conks are hardcore christians, therefore they instictively believe man was born bad and that the future on earth is doomed.

I don't think there is a difference. Both Donks and Conks are Pessimists, optimists, hopeful, believe in change, fear of change, stagnate, progressive, religious. People like Rush Limbaugh like to make people seem different, bringing hate and discount into the world, and have a good time doing it, then go home and relax amoungst the sex and drugs.

Piggybacking on what Gil wrote, aren't Conks and Donks both trying to turn back the clock? Conks to the 50's and the social mores of Donna Reed? And Donks to the 50's and the economy of Ward Cleaver where every blue collar worker makes $50/hour and has a 4 bedroom house with a boat in the driveway?

UNI88 wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:
I don't think there is a difference. Both Donks and Conks are Pessimists, optimists, hopeful, believe in change, fear of change, stagnate, progressive, religious. People like Rush Limbaugh like to make people seem different, bringing hate and discount into the world, and have a good time doing it, then go home and relax amoungst the sex and drugs.

Piggybacking on what Gil wrote, aren't Conks and Donks both trying to turn back the clock? Conks to the 50's and the social mores of Donna Reed? And Donks to the 50's and the economy of Ward Cleaver where every blue collar worker makes $50/hour and has a 4 bedroom house with a boat in the driveway?

No, I don't think so. Ward Cleaver was a cocksucker if you tune into the undertones of Leave it to Beaver. He was abusive, probably a drunk, yelled at and clubbed Wally and The Beaver and lost his temper at the sight of cookie crumbs, much like every other Conk's dad did from '46 to '92. No way he was a Progressive Liberal Ubermensch. Second, he was an an engineer, it was revealed in one episode, so he was definitely not blue collar.






















*Closed circuit to Conks: Try to recognize the over-the-top humor. If you don't see it, have your wife check your pulse.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:First, I'VE got bigger boobs than she does.

Second, we don't set ourselves up for beatdowns...only a DONK would feel that arguing from emotion beats a fact based discussion.

Now, go back to your self congratulatory mode.

"Hmmmm. Let's see, let's see, let's see. Looking for fact-based sh*t Z's been involved with in the last year........Nope, not there. Not there, either. Here he tries to use humor, but just ends up smug, so no facts there. Hmmmmmm."

Earth to Cap'n...

...did YOU just accuse someone of never posting fact?

Dude, I can't remember the last time I EVER saw you back up any of your rantings with outside sourcing. Hell, your headshot is in Merriam-Webster's next to the word "kneejerk".

And D1B declaring Conks are pessimist and Donks are optimists? Say WHAT????

Donks have the market cornered on pissin' and moanin'. The Queens of Blame Game, Dems, partake in their self pity with ritualistic consistency, yet D1B declares Christians (who KNOW there's hope) consecrated pessimists?

You two crack me up...

travelinman67 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:



"Hmmmm. Let's see, let's see, let's see. Looking for fact-based sh*t Z's been involved with in the last year........Nope, not there. Not there, either. Here he tries to use humor, but just ends up smug, so no facts there. Hmmmmmm."

Earth to Cap'n...

...did YOU just accuse someone of never posting fact?

Dude, I can't remember the last time I EVER saw you back up any of your rantings with outside sourcing. Hell, your headshot is in Merriam-Webster's next to the word "kneejerk".

And D1B declaring Conks are pessimist and Donks are optimists? Say WHAT????

Donks have the market cornered on pissin' and moanin'. The Queens of Blame Game, Dems, partake in their self pity with ritualistic consistency, yet D1B declares Christians (who KNOW there's hope) consecrated pessimists?

You two crack me up...

Tman, Cap'n nor I need to back up anything we say with "outside sources". Our thoughts, if not completely original and therefore outside sources do not exist, are known fact - like 2+2=4 or "all conks are racists."

You may comment but not dispute.

D1B wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Earth to Cap'n...

...did YOU just accuse someone of never posting fact?

Dude, I can't remember the last time I EVER saw you back up any of your rantings with outside sourcing. Hell, your headshot is in Merriam-Webster's next to the word "kneejerk".

And D1B declaring Conks are pessimist and Donks are optimists? Say WHAT????

Donks have the market cornered on pissin' and moanin'. The Queens of Blame Game, Dems, partake in their self pity with ritualistic consistency, yet D1B declares Christians (who KNOW there's hope) consecrated pessimists?

You two crack me up...

Tman, Cap'n nor I need to back up anything we say with "outside sources". Our thoughts, if not completely original and therefore outside sources do not exist, are known fact - like 2+2=4 or "all conks are racists."

You may comment but not dispute.

Fv*k...

I've got nothing...

travelinman67 wrote:

D1B wrote:
Tman, Cap'n nor I need to back up anything we say with "outside sources". Our thoughts, if not completely original and therefore outside sources do not exist, are known fact - like 2+2=4 or "all conks are racists."

You may comment but not dispute.

Fv*k...

I've got nothing...

Then go to your "hitler youth" thread, I need some outside sources.

Cap'n and D1B always provide good entertainment and people keep getting reeled in.

Yeah, hey, Tman and all Conks and Donks, D1B is right -

This forum is one of thoughts and ideas. I'm here to see yours and I'll show you mine.

There is no need for citing every motherfvcking sentence you type. I assume that everyone here is telling the truth when they post something. I assume we're all college graduates or have some college experience. I trust virtually everyone here. What I post is my thought on things and I don't need linkage "support". If you disagree, then disagree. This ain't fvcking grad school and we're not being graded on this stuff, this is merely a tangent political forum on a fvcking football message board. If you're lying about stuff, it will be discovered and you will be shunned in the manners exercised by human behavior.

That's why, T, I said in a post a couple days ago, I'm interested in your words on something, not what a three-mile-long declarative from the San Joaquin Valley Association Of Chambers Of Commerce and Industry, Milburn Drysdale, President, has to say.


Cap'n Cat hath Spoken.

Long Live Cap'n Cat.



"Now carry on, you peasants."




Closed circuit to ASUMountaineer: If you ever had anything good to contribute here, we might even laugh at your posts. Until then......

Cap'n Cat wrote:Yeah, hey, Tman and all Conks and Donks, D1B is right -

This forum is one of thoughts and ideas. I'm here to see yours and I'll show you mine.

There is no need for citing every motherfvcking sentence you type. I assume that everyone here is telling the truth when they post something. I assume we're all college graduates or have some college experience. I trust virtually everyone here. What I post is my thought on things and I don't need linkage "support". If you disagree, then disagree. This ain't fvcking grad school and we're not being graded on this stuff, this is merely a tangent political forum on a fvcking football message board. If you're lying about stuff, it will be discovered and you will be shunned in the manners exercised by human behavior.

That's why, T, I said in a post a couple days ago, I'm interested in your words on something, not what a three-mile-long declarative from the San Joaquin Valley Association Of Chambers Of Commerce and Industry, Milburn Drysdale, President, has to say.


Cap'n Cat hath Spoken.

Long Live Cap'n Cat.



"Now carry on, you peasants."




Closed circuit to ASUMountaineer: If you ever had anything good to contribute here, we might even laugh at your posts. Until then......

Since facts are not required, OL FU is hereby nominated for the most handsome poster.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Yeah, hey, Tman and all Conks and Donks, D1B is right -

This forum is one of thoughts and ideas. I'm here to see yours and I'll show you mine.

There is no need for citing every motherfvcking sentence you type. I assume that everyone here is telling the truth when they post something. I assume we're all college graduates or have some college experience. I trust virtually everyone here. What I post is my thought on things and I don't need linkage "support". If you disagree, then disagree. This ain't fvcking grad school and we're not being graded on this stuff, this is merely a tangent political forum on a fvcking football message board. If you're lying about stuff, it will be discovered and you will be shunned in the manners exercised by human behavior.

That's why, T, I said in a post a couple days ago, I'm interested in your words on something, not what a three-mile-long declarative from the San Joaquin Valley Association Of Chambers Of Commerce and Industry, Milburn Drysdale, President, has to say.


Cap'n Cat hath Spoken.

Long Live Cap'n Cat.



"Now carry on, you peasants."




Closed circuit to ASUMountaineer: If you ever had anything good to contribute here, we might even laugh at your posts. Until then......

Thank god, my bibliography was starting to really lengthen

Cap'n Cat wrote:Yeah, hey, Tman and all Conks and Donks, D1B is right -

This forum is one of thoughts and ideas. I'm here to see yours and I'll show you mine.

There is no need for citing every motherfvcking sentence you type. I assume that everyone here is telling the truth when they post something. I assume we're all college graduates or have some college experience. I trust virtually everyone here. What I post is my thought on things and I don't need linkage "support". If you disagree, then disagree. This ain't fvcking grad school and we're not being graded on this stuff, this is merely a tangent political forum on a fvcking football message board. If you're lying about stuff, it will be discovered and you will be shunned in the manners exercised by human behavior.

That's why, T, I said in a post a couple days ago, I'm interested in your words on something, not what a three-mile-long declarative from the San Joaquin Valley Association Of Chambers Of Commerce and Industry, Milburn Drysdale, President, has to say.


Cap'n Cat hath Spoken.

Long Live Cap'n Cat.



"Now carry on, you peasants."




Closed circuit to ASUMountaineer: If you ever had anything good to contribute here, we might even laugh at your posts. Until then......

Open circuit to Cap'n Cat. 1) I wasn't trying to be funny, I was complimenting your post and ripping those who were all worked up by it, guess it went over your head. 2) You think people care what you think of them. 3) Not sure what your deal is with me--but, who gives a shit? 4) Carry on...we know you will.

As for what I contribute to this site? That's hilarious. This "tangent political forum of a fvcking football message board." You crack me up.

Share your thoughts, eh?

ASUMountaineer wrote: Open circuit to Cap'n Cat. 1) I wasn't trying to be funny, I was complimenting your post and ripping those who were all worked up by it, guess it went over your head. 2) You think people care what you think of them. 3) Not sure what your deal is with me--but, who gives a shit? 4) Carry on...we know you will.

As for what I contribute to this site? That's hilarious. This "tangent political forum of a fvcking football message board." You crack me up.

Share your thoughts, eh?

Guess he told me.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote: Open circuit to Cap'n Cat. 1) I wasn't trying to be funny, I was complimenting your post and ripping those who were all worked up by it, guess it went over your head. 2) You think people care what you think of them. 3) Not sure what your deal is with me--but, who gives a shit? 4) Carry on...we know you will.

As for what I contribute to this site? That's hilarious. This "tangent political forum of a fvcking football message board." You crack me up.

Share your thoughts, eh?

Guess he told me.

Not trying to tell you Cap'n. Just dishing it back. I really don't try to be all hardcore like T-man, and push buttons like D1B (he is one of the funniest dudes on the site). I don't think of myself as having an "identity" here. I know you don't really care for my posts (you've told me before). That's cool. Next time I try to make a funny, I'll strive higher.

As for what I think is wrong with conks. People who agree with and think like this tool.

Nope, you did tell me. I kneejerked to the negative, a very Conk-like thing to do. A thousand pardons, please.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Nope, you did tell me. I kneejerked to the negative, a very Conk-like thing to do. A thousand pardons, please.