Thankful for SCOTUS

[89Hen]

Who would she have appointed? What makes them not moderate? Would we have had on-demand abortion clinics where we could simultaneously turn in our guns?

You keep digging your liberal hole deeper.

[kalm]

Who would she have appointed? What makes them not moderate? Would we have had on-demand abortion clinics where we could simultaneously turn in our guns?

You keep digging your liberal hole deeper.

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

[Ivytalk]

You keep digging your liberal hole deeper.

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

Anyone who thinks Merrick Garland is a "moderate" is smoking a Gary Johnson special.

[89Hen]

You keep digging your liberal hole deeper.

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

You sound like Rachel Maddow and those weren't questions, they were hyperbole... that was the point.

[Grizalltheway]

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

You sound like Rachel Maddow and those weren't questions, they were hyperbole... that was the point.

Considering how much hyperventilating conks were doing over the prospect of Hillary shaping the future of the court, I don't think so.

[89Hen]

You sound like Rachel Maddow and those weren't questions, they were hyperbole... that was the point.

Considering how much hyperventilating conks were doing over the prospect of Hillary shaping the future of the court, I don't think so.

Ohhh, so the hyperventilating donks are doing over neighbors being taken out of their homes in the middle of the night and the public hanging of gays is not hyperbole. Gotcha.

[Grizalltheway]

Considering how much hyperventilating conks were doing over the prospect of Hillary shaping the future of the court, I don't think so.

Ohhh, so the hyperventilating donks are doing over neighbors being taken out of their homes in the middle of the night and the public hanging of gays is not hyperbole. Gotcha.

WTF does that have to do with the questions kalm asked?

[89Hen]

Ohhh, so the hyperventilating donks are doing over neighbors being taken out of their homes in the middle of the night and the public hanging of gays is not hyperbole. Gotcha.

WTF does that have to do with the questions kalm asked?

Nothing, it was a response to your post that had nothing do with kalm's hyperbole.

[kalm]

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

Anyone who thinks Merrick Garland is a "moderate" is smoking a Gary Johnson special.

Garland was Obama's appointment. Did Hillary say she'd appoint him too? And what about Garland makes him radical? It's your area of expertise so I'm genuinely curious. Or is it that he's to the left of Scalia (who was clearly not an moderate).

And who else would Hillary have appointed?

[kalm]

What hole is it that you think I'm digging?



Try answering my questions...

You sound like Rachel Maddow and those weren't questions, they were hyperbole... that was the point.

And you and Ivy sound like Phillis Schlafly...

A moderate on the court! Boo!!!

[Grizalltheway]

WTF does that have to do with the questions kalm asked?

Nothing, it was a response to your post that had nothing do with kalm's hyperbole.

Right. The massive run on guns and ammo had nothing to do with a prospective Clinton presidency.

[89Hen]

Nothing, it was a response to your post that had nothing do with kalm's hyperbole.

Right. The massive run on guns and ammo had nothing to do with a prospective Clinton presidency.

Keep going down your tangent.

[89Hen]

And I feel strongly that the Supreme Court needs to stand on the side of the American people, not on the side of the powerful corporations and the wealthy. For me, that means that we need a Supreme Court that will stand up on behalf of women’s rights, on behalf of the rights of the LGBT community, that will stand up and say no to Citizens United, a decision that has undermined the election system in our country because of the way it permits dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system.

[Ivytalk]

Anyone who thinks Merrick Garland is a "moderate" is smoking a Gary Johnson special.

Garland was Obama's appointment. Did Hillary say she'd appoint him too? And what about Garland makes him radical? It's your area of expertise so I'm genuinely curious. Or is it that he's to the left of Scalia (who was clearly not an moderate).

And who else would Hillary have appointed?

Hillary has been mum about Garland -- not that it matters now. A review of Garland's record on the DC Circuit shows that he is hostile to gun rights (based, among other things, on his vote to reconsider en banc DC gun restrictions that had been unanimously invalidated by a 3-judge panel) and deferential to federal agencies against business interests, siding with the NLRB 16 times out of 16 and favorable to EPA regulations as well. A New York Times article charted his record against that of the four sitting SCOTUS liberals and found him to the left of Kagan and Breyer and slightly to the right of Sotomayor and Ginsburg. Nothing to suggest that he wouldn't be a solid liberal vote on issues like campaign finance, abortion, and the administrative state.

And bear in mind that Hillary, if elected with a Democratic Senate, would have nominated nobody less liberal than Garland. Picture a Court with 5 Liz Warrens on it.

[kalm]

Picture a Court with 5 Liz Warrens on it.

[SDHornet]

Picture a Court with 5 Liz Warrens on it.

[Grizalltheway]

Right. The massive run on guns and ammo had nothing to do with a prospective Clinton presidency.

Keep going down your tangent.

It's not a tangent. It directly relates to one of the things you dismissed as hyperbole.

[93henfan]

Keep going down your tangent.

It's not a tangent. It directly relates to one of the things you dismissed as hyperbole.

It's hyperbola, dumb ass! You suck at trigonometry!!

At least you got TAN right.

[Grizalltheway]

SIN and COS can KMA.

[89Hen]

Keep going down your tangent.

It's not a tangent. It directly relates to one of the things you dismissed as hyperbole.

Because both your and kalm's posts have the word "guns"?

[kalm]

It's not a tangent. It directly relates to one of the things you dismissed as hyperbole.

Because both your and kalm's posts have the word "guns"?

So who was Hdog going to appoint and which of our liberties were these radicals going to steal?

[89Hen]

Because both your and kalm's posts have the word "guns"?

So who was Hdog going to appoint and which of our liberties were these radicals going to steal?

We will never know, will we. But I can guarantee it would have been a liberal judge.

[kalm]

So who was Hdog going to appoint and which of our liberties were these radicals going to steal?

We will never know, will we. But I can guarantee it would have been a liberal judge.

A moderate liberal or a radical?

(back...where we started...)

[Ivytalk]

We will never know, will we. But I can guarantee it would have been a liberal judge.

A moderate liberal or a radical?

(back...where we started...)

Well, we know that Hildabitch wanted to overrule Citizens United, which makes her a know-nothing radical who would have made that a litmus test for the SCOTUS. But she didn't figure that such a ruling might put the Clinton Foundation out of business.

[89Hen]

We will never know, will we. But I can guarantee it would have been a liberal judge.

A moderate liberal or a radical?

(back...where we started...)

Not quite kalm. Clearly you implied that Hillary would be appointing middle of the road folks maybe even slightly to the right...

a center right politician like Hillary appoint moderates to the court!

Hillary would have appointed judges FIRMLY in the liberal camp. Please tell me you don't suggest otherwise.