Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Oh...wait. Nope.

Interfering with elections is not so bad when they were trying to help Hillary.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/u ... ire-233446

"Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia.

Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections."



Funny...not a peep from Obama. And funnier...it appears the people who helped Hillary were connected, surprise, to the same people who helped the, "people's" uprising against the democratically elected, pro-Russian, government.

Gosh...I can't wait to see what Obama does to punish the Ukrainians involved.

"Yo...DT"

"What up my Cossack"?

"Let's say, hypothetically speaking of course, Ukrainian government was repressing good people of Ukraine and there is call for Russia to intervene on their behalf. And let's say, hypothetically of course, Russia invades the Ukraine on humanitarian mission. How would new government in Washington react?"

"What invasion?"

"Spasibo"

It's appalling to see a country meddling in the affairs of another sovereign country.

kalm wrote:"Yo...DT"

"What up my Cossack"?

"Let's say, hypothetically speaking of course, Ukrainian government was repressing good people of Ukraine and there is call for Russia to intervene on their behalf. And let's say, hypothetically of course, Russia invades the Ukraine on humanitarian mission. How would new government in Washington react?"

"What invasion?"

"Spasibo"

Ukraine wants to be in NATO.

Globalist US politicians want Ukraine (and other basket cases) to be in NATO.

Hillary Clinton is a globalist US politician.

This article is pretty much "the sky is blue".





BTW remember way back when a certain executive branch department funneled money to a political organization dedicated to defeating Bibi Netanyahu in the last election?

Good times

I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Isn't it funny (and ironic) when a negro tells people they have to go to the back of the bus?

93henfan wrote:

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Isn't it funny (and ironic) when a negro tells people they have to go to the back of the bus?

I think observing that being funny falls into a category either of a micro-aggression or unacceptable privilege and should be avoided at all costs.

93henfan wrote:

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Isn't it funny (and ironic) when a negro tells people they have to go to the back of the bus?

93henfan wrote:

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Isn't it funny (and ironic) when a negro tells people they have to go to the back of the bus?

93henfan wrote:

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Isn't it funny (and ironic) when a negro tells people they have to go to the back of the bus?

Obama was uppity, wasn't he.

GannonFan wrote:I remember when a certain President tried to scare the voters of the UK in the run-up to their election by saying that if they voted for Brexit then the UK would go to the back of the line when it came to trade deals with the US. Good times.

Obummer used the word "queue" so the Brits would understand it.

Then the Brits called his scrawny azz on it!