What was that Obama was saying about facts and reason again?
Who needs evidence when it's self-evident that police kill black men 'cause racism? Data be all racist n sheeit.


Yeah, preponderance of the evidence be damned.Chizzang wrote:Where's Roger Goodell...
He'll explain how we can assume guilt based on a general feeling

The preponderance of evidence was that the Patriots were deflating balls (no question)Baldy wrote:Yeah, preponderance of the evidence be damned.Chizzang wrote:Where's Roger Goodell...
He'll explain how we can assume guilt based on a general feeling

I dunno, kind of like how the league destroyed all those tapes the Pats gave them of what the Pats were taping during the games of the other sideline. Shocking the league didn't let everyone see the extent or detail of what was on those tapes.Chizzang wrote:The preponderance of evidence was that the Patriots were deflating balls (no question)Baldy wrote: Yeah, preponderance of the evidence be damned.
There is however no evidence that they were deflating them below league specified minimums
The league commissioned a study of ball inflation vs. game use in 2016
and guess what... It'll never make it to the light of day
Why..?

Breaking:GannonFan wrote:I dunno, kind of like how the league destroyed all those tapes the Pats gave them of what the Pats were taping during the games of the other sideline. Shocking the league didn't let everyone see the extent or detail of what was on those tapes.Chizzang wrote:
The preponderance of evidence was that the Patriots were deflating balls (no question)
There is however no evidence that they were deflating them below league specified minimums
The league commissioned a study of ball inflation vs. game use in 2016
and guess what... It'll never make it to the light of day
Why..?

Why would it go away when the Patriots pretty much got away with it? The NFL basically said "go ahead and do it - if you get caught red-handed, we'll fine you and dock you some draft picks, but we'll destroy the evidence so that no one will ever be able to definitively question your legacy".Chizzang wrote:Breaking:GannonFan wrote:
I dunno, kind of like how the league destroyed all those tapes the Pats gave them of what the Pats were taping during the games of the other sideline. Shocking the league didn't let everyone see the extent or detail of what was on those tapes.
The league is still trying to catch teams filming in unsanctioned locations
It's a problem that won't go away

Everybody is free to question the Patriots legacyGannonFan wrote:Why would it go away when the Patriots pretty much got away with it? The NFL basically said "go ahead and do it - if you get caught red-handed, we'll fine you and dock you some draft picks, but we'll destroy the evidence so that no one will ever be able to definitively question your legacy".Chizzang wrote:
Breaking:
The league is still trying to catch teams filming in unsanctioned locations
It's a problem that won't go away
Doesn't matter. That's not why Brady was suspended.Chizzang wrote:The preponderance of evidence was that the Patriots were deflating balls (no question)Baldy wrote: Yeah, preponderance of the evidence be damned.
There is however no evidence that they were deflating them below league specified minimums
The league commissioned a study of ball inflation vs. game use in 2016
and guess what... It'll never make it to the light of day
Why..?

Indeed,Baldy wrote:Doesn't matter. That's not why Brady was suspended.Chizzang wrote:
The preponderance of evidence was that the Patriots were deflating balls (no question)
There is however no evidence that they were deflating them below league specified minimums
The league commissioned a study of ball inflation vs. game use in 2016
and guess what... It'll never make it to the light of day
Why..?



And you voted for the candidate who wanted to do more of these sham investigations...JohnStOnge wrote:I can't prove it but I have always believed that those Justice Department investigations of police departments are a sham. Don't think they have any credibility at all. If they ever do one and end up saying "Nope. The police department is NOT engaging in a pattern of whatever" I might change my mind. But I've pretty much come to believe that they know what they're conclusion's going to be before they start.