Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -data.html

I am surprised that any media is reporting this. Must be up to something because it is highly unlikely a liberal rag like this is being impartial.

Truth has never been a staple in the left wing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Daily Mail is right wing
The Guardian is left wing

Skjellyfetti wrote:Daily Mail is right wing
The Guardian is left wing

Potato tomato

Yeah, this global warming thing is all a bunch of BS...........................................LOL

It is.

Even if it isnt there is NOTHING humans can do about it. If you idiot global warming people can figure out how to stop a hurricane, tornado or even the common cold then I will entertain a discussion about it. We couldnt up or down the temp the atmosphere is just too voluminous.

But please continue bitching about it, so we can keep laughing.

Well, we did a good job reducing or outright eliminating problems with smog in most of the country.

But, fuck the EPA, amirite?

Skjellyfetti wrote:Well, we did a good job reducing or outright eliminating problems with smog in most of the country.

But, fuck the EPA, amirite?

Are you seriously going to try and compare 20 million tons of smog in the USA to the entire Earths atmosphere?



Please do some research on the sheer volumes of the:
Troposphere
Stratusphere
Mesosphere
Ionosphere
Thermosphere
Exosphere

Then you will see why I am laughing so hard at this!!!

Skjellyfetti wrote:Well, we did a good job reducing or outright eliminating problems with smog in most of the country.

But, fuck the EPA, amirite?

But what about India and China and the rest of the world who laughs off these regulations? Those two countries alone dwarf what good anything we do in America. If the warming and cooling have anything to do with humans in the first place!

andy7171 wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Well, we did a good job reducing or outright eliminating problems with smog in most of the country.

But, fuck the EPA, amirite?

But what about India and China and the rest of the world who laughs off these regulations? Those two countries alone dwarf what good anything we do in America. If the warming and cooling have anything to do with humans in the first place!

Shut up, Andy. We get cheap stuff at Walmart out of this.

kalm wrote:

andy7171 wrote: But what about India and China and the rest of the world who laughs off these regulations? Those two countries alone dwarf what good anything we do in America. If the warming and cooling have anything to do with humans in the first place!

Shut up, Andy. We get cheap stuff at Walmart out of this.

No. You shut up kalmy!

andy7171 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Shut up, Andy. We get cheap stuff at Walmart out of this.

No. You shut up kalmy!

Hey! Your posts DO NOT spread love and cheer.

Andy...sit in a corner and contemplate seafood.

kalm...go sit in on a putting green and contemplate fake seafood.

Cluck U wrote:

andy7171 wrote: No. You shut up kalmy!

Hey! Your posts DO NOT spread love and cheer.

Andy...sit in a corner and contemplate seafood.

kalm...go sit in on a putting green and contemplate fake seafood.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:It is.

Even if it isnt there is NOTHING humans can do about it. If you idiot global warming people can figure out how to stop a hurricane, tornado or even the common cold then I will entertain a discussion about it. We couldnt up or down the temp the atmosphere is just too voluminous.

But please continue bitching about it, so we can keep laughing.

Link? Or should we just take your word for it as a renowned atmospheric scientist?

You peeps complain about everything.

What's wrong with a little global warming?

Yesterday I believed in global warming. (70 degrees)
Today I don't believe in global warming. (Snow flurries)

If it's true it wouldn't surprise me. As I've posted many times: "Science" is an effective process. But anybody who doesn't think there is bias among ScienTISTS and present in the Scientific Journal publication process is kidding themselves. Saying "Science has shown this" and saying "Scientists say this" can be two different things.

Whoops a daisy!

Gullible conks...

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... te-science

kalm wrote:Whoops a daisy!

Gullible conks...

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... te-science

Well, to Alpha's credit... he did say...

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: I am surprised that any media is reporting this.

Grizalltheway wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:It is.

Even if it isnt there is NOTHING humans can do about it. If you idiot global warming people can figure out how to stop a hurricane, tornado or even the common cold then I will entertain a discussion about it. We couldnt up or down the temp the atmosphere is just too voluminous.

But please continue bitching about it, so we can keep laughing.

Link? Or should we just take your word for it as a renowned atmospheric scientist?

Yes

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

First saw this in the WSJ and now on CNN. Could be an interesting proposal - a carbon tax that also returns money to taxpayers in the form of dividends (rather than just going to the government coffers to be spent however).

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/ ... index.html

GannonFan wrote:First saw this in the WSJ and now on CNN. Could be an interesting proposal - a carbon tax that also returns money to taxpayers in the form of dividends (rather than just going to the government coffers to be spent however).

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/ ... index.html

Let's see, make production more expensive and put more money in people's hands. Sounds like a recipe for inflation to me.

Pwns wrote:

GannonFan wrote:First saw this in the WSJ and now on CNN. Could be an interesting proposal - a carbon tax that also returns money to taxpayers in the form of dividends (rather than just going to the government coffers to be spent however).

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/ ... index.html

Let's see, make production more expensive and put more money in people's hands. Sounds like a recipe for inflation to me.

I believe the environmentalists would say that you're not necessarily making production more expensive, you're just adding in the externalities that should be included to reflect the real cost. Did I get that right kalmie???

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Link? Or should we just take your word for it as a renowned atmospheric scientist?

Yes

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Okay

GannonFan wrote:

Pwns wrote:
Let's see, make production more expensive and put more money in people's hands. Sounds like a recipe for inflation to me.

I believe the environmentalists would say that you're not necessarily making production more expensive, you're just adding in the externalities that should be included to reflect the real cost. Did I get that right kalmie???