Сделаем Америку снова великой! Trump - Russia megathread

[css75]

Stills big fat juicy nothing burger have a pair jelly.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Skjellyfetti]

Why wasn't the original 302 form for the Flynn investigation not submitted to the judge? How can a 302 form that summarizes an interview of Stzrok and his interview of Flynn be allowed?

I'm a little fuzzy with what is going on here.

Judge Sullivan had set a deadline of 3 pm Friday which Mueller met. He included a cover letter warning the judge not to “minimize” the seriousness of the charges against Flynn. Missing from the documents was the original and crucial FBI 302 report. FBI rules require that a 302 report be prepared within five days of an interview. Instead, Fox News reports that the 302 submitted to Judge Sullivan was dated July 19, 2017 and “specifically came from an interview with Strzok in which the Flynn encounter was discussed — and not the original Flynn interview.” Worse still, this report was heavily redacted. One and a half pages were completely redacted

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaug ... ths-later/

The judge didn't ask for the original Flynn 302 to be included. It may have already been included under seal, we don't know.

The one dated July 19 is not a 302 from the interview with Flynn - but, a 302 from an interview with Strzok. It's the one Flynn's defense brought up in their sentencing document - so, that's the one the judge wanted to see.

Flynn plead guilty, and the judge isn't going to overturn his guilty plea. Mueller and Co. recommended a reduced sentence due to his cooperation, and I bet he just gets probation.

[css75]

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[houndawg]

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There's some people in jail that disagree with you.

[houndawg]

Hmmm.

Mueller's angry Democrats lyin' to federal judges again.

Right, Cid?

I’m not sure what you’re talking about here

But your continued crusade for that big win... and all the real estate I occupy in your head is gratifying

No Russia collusion, Jelly. Mueller has known it all along

It’s an investigation in search of the crime

This is about as important as real estate during the Whitewater investigation.

And it seems to be finding plenty of crime.

And it's entertaining as all hell

[houndawg]

As Trumps personal "fixer" and lawyer for 14 years
Trump can make a legitimate claim he really doesn't know Cohen



I mean, how can you really know somebody..?

Well, truth be told, we've thought for the past 14 years that JSO was a bible-touting, red to the gums conk who would make out with Ted Boobs if Ted was willing. Next thing we know he's actively advocating to write a glowing forward to Hillary Clinton's biography and considers her to be one of the most gifted and fantastic politicians this country has ever produced. Just when you think you know somebody...

JSO is the best troll on this site. The rest of us are playing for second place.


And Hillary Clinton is laughing her ass off.

[CID1990]

I’m not sure what you’re talking about here

But your continued crusade for that big win... and all the real estate I occupy in your head is gratifying

No Russia collusion, Jelly. Mueller has known it all along

It’s an investigation in search of the crime

This is about as important as real estate during the Whitewater investigation.

And it seems to be finding plenty of crime.

And it's entertaining as all hell

Just make sure you follow with the Resistance media and don’t call it the “Russia investigation”

The new hotness is the “Mueller investigation”

100 pages later... ol CID is still right

[houndawg]

This is about as important as real estate during the Whitewater investigation.

And it seems to be finding plenty of crime.

And it's entertaining as all hell

Just make sure you follow with the Resistance media and don’t call it the “Russia investigation”

The new hotness is the “Mueller investigation”

100 pages later... ol CID is still right

So much winning!

[CID1990]

Just make sure you follow with the Resistance media and don’t call it the “Russia investigation”

The new hotness is the “Mueller investigation”

100 pages later... ol CID is still right

So much winning!

I'm like the Bison of this thread!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

Why wasn't the original 302 form for the Flynn investigation not submitted to the judge? How can a 302 form that summarizes an interview of Stzrok and his interview of Flynn be allowed?

I'm a little fuzzy with what is going on here.



https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaug ... ths-later/

The judge didn't ask for the original Flynn 302 to be included. It may have already been included under seal, we don't know.

The one dated July 19 is not a 302 from the interview with Flynn - but, a 302 from an interview with Strzok. It's the one Flynn's defense brought up in their sentencing document - so, that's the one the judge wanted to see.

Flynn plead guilty, and the judge isn't going to overturn his guilty plea. Mueller and Co. recommended a reduced sentence due to his cooperation, and I bet he just gets probation.

I'm reading the judge asked for any 302 related to Flynn and that means the original. Also seeing the original could have been submitted privately to the judge.

[houndawg]

So much winning!

I'm like the Bison of this thread!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You should move up to the big time!

[houndawg]

The judge didn't ask for the original Flynn 302 to be included. It may have already been included under seal, we don't know.

The one dated July 19 is not a 302 from the interview with Flynn - but, a 302 from an interview with Strzok. It's the one Flynn's defense brought up in their sentencing document - so, that's the one the judge wanted to see.

Flynn plead guilty, and the judge isn't going to overturn his guilty plea. Mueller and Co. recommended a reduced sentence due to his cooperation, and I bet he just gets probation.

I'm reading the judge asked for any 302 related to Flynn and that means the original. Also seeing the original could have been submitted privately to the judge.

He's a traitor, SG, and everybody knows it.

[Ivytalk]

Even NPR has thrown in the towel.

[Chizzang]

That's ^ about as inaccurate a post as you could construct regarding JSO

He is conservative - he just hates Trump
His one sin around here was actively arguing that Trump was a worse choice that Clinton

Which was then construed into all variety of mischaracterizations about him
When in reality he was the only Conservative on this forum
willing to openly discuss the fraudster that is now the President

Keep that in mind when the Conservatives on here point out how ME TOO destroys other liberals
While we watch them destroy a conservative right before our very eyes

Triggered much?

Me thinks you have nothing else...

[JohnStOnge]

New NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has this query:

Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement:
Donald Trump has been honest and truthful when it comes to the investigation into Russian interference with
the 2016 presidential election and related matters.

See question 20 of the poll at http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_c ... lease).pdf.

34% of respondents either somewhat or strongly agreed. 62% either somewhat or strongly disagreed.

How in the hell could 34% possibly think that Donald Trump is honest and truthful about ANYTHING? We have a serious "idiot factor" affecting us right now.

[Skjellyfetti]

34% are his Red Hat base that will support him no matter what. That number is also right around his approval rating floor. It never has and never will go below that.

[SeattleGriz]

New NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has this query:

Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement:
Donald Trump has been honest and truthful when it comes to the investigation into Russian interference with
the 2016 presidential election and related matters.

See question 20 of the poll at http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_c ... lease).pdf.

34% of respondents either somewhat or strongly agreed. 62% either somewhat or strongly disagreed.

How in the hell could 34% possibly think that Donald Trump is honest and truthful about ANYTHING? We have a serious "idiot factor" affecting us right now.

Because as President he's been pretty straightforward. Everyone knows he's a business piece if shit, but politically, he isn't doing anything worse than other elected politicians.

[JohnStOnge]

Because as President he's been pretty straightforward.

I can't believe you wrote that. Are you serious?

[SeattleGriz]

Because as President he's been pretty straightforward.

I can't believe you wrote that. Are you serious?

Yes. How hard is it for you to read Trump? He talks like every CEO by saying everything is awesome. Pretty easy to see past that.

Outside that obvious shit, he's doing what he said he would.

[Chizzang]

I can't believe you wrote that. Are you serious?

Yes. How hard is it for you to read Trump? He talks like every CEO by saying everything is awesome. Pretty easy to see past that.

Outside that obvious shit, he's doing what he said he would.

He also tweeted today that saying negatives things about him should be a criminal offense...
What should we think about that - since you know how to "read him"

[SeattleGriz]

Yes. How hard is it for you to read Trump? He talks like every CEO by saying everything is awesome. Pretty easy to see past that.

Outside that obvious shit, he's doing what he said he would.

He also tweeted today that saying negatives things about him should be a criminal offense...
What should we think about that - since you know how to "read him"

Pretty obvious he's pointing out his 91% negative news coverage. How many of these bold media claims has he executed?

Not to mention 95% if his stuff is trolling material as well.

[Chizzang]

He also tweeted today that saying negatives things about him should be a criminal offense...
What should we think about that - since you know how to "read him"

Pretty obvious he's pointing out his 91% negative news coverage. How many of these bold media claims has he executed?

Not to mention 95% if his stuff is trolling material as well.

So who decides when the President of the United States says something
that we should "believe him" or "Ignore him"

I'm not sure I understand where "ignore the President of the United States.."
is now a serious option on a daily basis apparently - even by his own supporters

[css75]

Because as President he's been pretty straightforward.

I can't believe you wrote that. Are you serious?

How many times did Obama hold meetings with Congressional people with an open camera? Your TDS is amazing,


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

So the Special counsel wipes both Stzrok and Pages iPhones and then tells everyone to trust them there weren't any substantive texts.

Its the Hillary Clinton maneuver.

[Skjellyfetti]

So the Special counsel wipes both Stzrok and Pages iPhones and then tells everyone to trust them there weren't any substantive texts.

Its the Hillary Clinton maneuver.

Ugh.

They turned in their phones. They were wiped and reassigned to other agents. The OIG recovered the phones and text messages.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000167 ... 7d48360000