Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

houndawg wrote:

SDHornet wrote:Hhmmm...Lisa Page lied about editing the 302's on the Flynn case...interesting...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1187 ... 45792.html

Fake news. False flag deep state disinformation campaign

css75 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Fake news. False flag deep state disinformation campaign

You may have to change your mind when people start going to court. DC lawyers gonna have some major paydays.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

houndawg wrote:

css75 wrote:

You may have to change your mind when people start going to court. DC lawyers gonna have some major paydays.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Just a diversion.

Exactly the move you would expect from somebody with nothing to hide...

houndawg wrote:

css75 wrote:

You may have to change your mind when people start going to court. DC lawyers gonna have some major paydays.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Just a diversion.

Exactly the move you would expect from somebody with nothing to hide...

CID1990 wrote:A lot of this stuff is a sideshow. Yes, there are dirty players on the left and they should be dealt with

But John Bolton is getting ready to testify and he is going to confirm that before he began to be cut out of the loop, there was talk of a quid pro quo with Ukraine

Trump is going to be impeached in the House

But the real question is what Schiff’s committee is going to dig up. It is possible that Bolton could give them enough to force a swing in the Senate. I can already think of a couple GOP Senators right now who would vote to convict Trump. There are three more who would not need much of a push.

SeattleGriz wrote:

CID1990 wrote:A lot of this stuff is a sideshow. Yes, there are dirty players on the left and they should be dealt with

But John Bolton is getting ready to testify and he is going to confirm that before he began to be cut out of the loop, there was talk of a quid pro quo with Ukraine

Trump is going to be impeached in the House

But the real question is what Schiff’s committee is going to dig up. It is possible that Bolton could give them enough to force a swing in the Senate. I can already think of a couple GOP Senators right now who would vote to convict Trump. There are three more who would not need much of a push.

In your honest opinion, do you find Trumps insistence troubling? Is his request out of the norm?

CID1990 wrote:A lot of this stuff is a sideshow. Yes, there are dirty players on the left and they should be dealt with

But John Bolton is getting ready to testify and he is going to confirm that before he began to be cut out of the loop, there was talk of a quid pro quo with Ukraine

Trump is going to be impeached in the House

But the real question is what Schiff’s committee is going to dig up. It is possible that Bolton could give them enough to force a swing in the Senate. I can already think of a couple GOP Senators right now who would vote to convict Trump. There are three more who would not need much of a push.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Oh. Flynn's 302s weren't edited.

I wonder where that originated. I bet a John Solomon article.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Oh. Flynn's 302s weren't edited.

I wonder where that originated. I bet a John Solomon article.

These close connections between the Washington Post’s David Ignatius and people connected to U.S. and U.K. intelligence raise grave concerns about the deep state using media to push propaganda

SeattleGriz wrote:Really? What a joke. Should be embarrassed. Government now saying they mixed up who wrote which 302 on Flynn.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-175478

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has found evidence that an FBI lawyer manipulated a key investigative document related to the FBI's secretive surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser -- enough to change the substantive meaning of the document, according to multiple reports.

The 2016 messages, sent between Lisa Page and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, also revealed that bureau brass circulated at least two anti-Trump blog articles, including a Lawfare blog post sent shortly after Election Day that called Trump possibly "among the major threats to the security of the country."

Fox News is told the texts were connected to the ultimately successful Page application, which relied in part on information from British ex-spy Christopher Steele – whose anti-Trump views are now well-documented – and cited Page’s suspected Russia ties. In its warrant application, the FBI inaccurately assured the FISA court on numerous occasions that media sources independently corroborated Steele's claims, and did not clearly state that Steele worked for a firm hired by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Much of the Steele dossier has been proved discredited or unsubstantiated, including the dossier's claims that the Trump campaign was paying hackers in the United States out of a non-existent Russian consulate in Miami, or that ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen traveled to Prague to conspire with Russians. Special Counsel Robert Mueller also was unable to substantiate the dossier's claims that Carter Page had received a large payment relating to the sale of a share of Rosneft, a Russian oil giant, or that a lurid blackmail tape involving the president existed.

Despite being accused by the FBI of being a Russian agent in the FISA application, and being secretly surveilled for more than a year, Page has not been charged with any wrongdoing. He has since sued numerous actors -- including the DNC -- for defamation related to claims that he worked with Russia.

houndawg wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Really? What a joke. Should be embarrassed. Government now saying they mixed up who wrote which 302 on Flynn.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-175478

Hey look over there!

css75 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Just a diversion.

Exactly the move you would expect from somebody with nothing to hide...

Oh ok.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

SDHornet wrote:

Barr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup

The prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize how U.S. agencies investigated President Trump’s 2016 campaign said he could not offer evidence to the Justice Department’s inspector general to support the suspicions of some conservatives that the case was a setup by American intelligence, people familiar with the matter said.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s office contacted U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor Barr personally tapped to lead a separate review of the 2016 probe into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the people said. The inspector general also contacted several U.S. intelligence agencies.

Among Horowitz’s questions: whether a Maltese professor who interacted with a Trump campaign adviser was actually a U.S. intelligence asset deployed to ensnare the campaign, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the inspector general’s findings have not been made public.

But the intelligence agencies said the professor was not among their assets, the people said. And Durham informed Horowitz’s office that his investigation had not produced any evidence that might contradict the inspector general’s findings on that point.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Awww. Barr is going to have to appoint Durham to investigate the Durham investigation.

Barr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup

The prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize how U.S. agencies investigated President Trump’s 2016 campaign said he could not offer evidence to the Justice Department’s inspector general to support the suspicions of some conservatives that the case was a setup by American intelligence, people familiar with the matter said.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s office contacted U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor Barr personally tapped to lead a separate review of the 2016 probe into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the people said. The inspector general also contacted several U.S. intelligence agencies.

Among Horowitz’s questions: whether a Maltese professor who interacted with a Trump campaign adviser was actually a U.S. intelligence asset deployed to ensnare the campaign, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the inspector general’s findings have not been made public.

But the intelligence agencies said the professor was not among their assets, the people said. And Durham informed Horowitz’s office that his investigation had not produced any evidence that might contradict the inspector general’s findings on that point.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... story.html