MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:51 pm

https://twitter.com/maddow/status/841795163664089089

Pwns · Post by **Pwns** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:13 pm

If this is legit and not some kind of tease, I will predict there will not be any major conflicts of interest but will be some pretty unflattering things.

∞∞∞ · Post by **∞∞∞** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:19 pm

I don't even care if he's done nothing wrong, it should be public information.

I really hope she's not messing around (although I doubt she is).

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:22 pm

Pwns wrote:If this is legit and not some kind of tease, I will predict there will not be any major conflicts of interest but will be some pretty unflattering things.

Anybody with the amount of real estate investments he has is going to have conflicts of interest

That's why I keep saying this is going to be a very interesting 4 years - because our government over time has been designed to make sure that nobody who actually makes things or navigates our financial structures would want the job. It just isn't set up for a Trump or a Gates or a Carnegie or Rockerfeller. Think of it as job security for career politicians who only know how to schmooze Big Defense and Big Labor and not much else

Trump's track record shows he hasn't always been the most adept person at navigating the private sector either - but that's not the point -

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

Establishment politicians both left and right are going to do their best to make sure it doesn't happen

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

∞∞∞ · Post by **∞∞∞** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:32 pm

It's the full 2005 tax return. A little disappointing that it's one year, but it's better than nothing. I'm sure the rest will eventually come out.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:19 pm

The problem is going to be that people not familiar with the tax regulations afforded by real estate transactions will go ape shit. This is likely another diversionary tactic and it will be a shitshow.
If there is smoke over here, there's a fire over there.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:35 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Pwns wrote:If this is legit and not some kind of tease, I will predict there will not be any major conflicts of interest but will be some pretty unflattering things.
Anybody with the amount of real estate investments he has is going to have conflicts of interest

That's why I keep saying this is going to be a very interesting 4 years - because our government over time has been designed to make sure that nobody who actually makes things or navigates our financial structures would want the job. It just isn't set up for a Trump or a Gates or a Carnegie or Rockerfeller. Think of it as job security for career politicians who only know how to schmooze Big Defense and Big Labor and not much else

Trump's track record shows he hasn't always been the most adept person at navigating the private sector either - but that's not the point -

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

Establishment politicians both left and right are going to do their best to make sure it doesn't happen

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

All CEO's are like Trump?

What I DO like about his political ascension is it was a poke in the eye to the PC crowd and how candidates are SUPPOSED to act (Clinton was like this to a much lesser degree)...pomp and circumstance be damned...

That's a good thing.

But there's probably still a few CEO's not as full of shit and self interest out there.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:23 pm

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Anybody with the amount of real estate investments he has is going to have conflicts of interest

That's why I keep saying this is going to be a very interesting 4 years - because our government over time has been designed to make sure that nobody who actually makes things or navigates our financial structures would want the job. It just isn't set up for a Trump or a Gates or a Carnegie or Rockerfeller. Think of it as job security for career politicians who only know how to schmooze Big Defense and Big Labor and not much else

Trump's track record shows he hasn't always been the most adept person at navigating the private sector either - but that's not the point -

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

Establishment politicians both left and right are going to do their best to make sure it doesn't happen

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
All CEO's are like Trump?

What I DO like about his political ascension is it was a poke in the eye to the PC crowd and how candidates are SUPPOSED to act (Clinton was like this to a much lesser degree)...pomp and circumstance be damned...

That's a good thing.

But there's probably still a few CEO's not as full of shit and self interest out there.

He's a CEO the same way Michael Jordan was a Baseball player...

Trump is really excellent at being a billionaire's son
who can put on dads old suit and tie and run a half dozen corporations into the ground

Jordan can win six titles and 5 MVP awards in the NBA
and go on to be a career .202 hitter with zero power in the lowest levels of professional baseball

Hey, they're both on TV a lot... So there's that too

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:32 pm

∞∞∞ wrote:I don't even care if he's done nothing wrong, it should be public information.

I really hope she's not messing around (although I doubt she is).

Why? Seriously?

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:15 pm

Chizzang wrote:
kalm wrote:
All CEO's are like Trump?

What I DO like about his political ascension is it was a poke in the eye to the PC crowd and how candidates are SUPPOSED to act (Clinton was like this to a much lesser degree)...pomp and circumstance be damned...

That's a good thing.

But there's probably still a few CEO's not as full of **** and self interest out there.
He's a CEO the same way Michael Jordan was a Baseball player...

Trump is really excellent at being a billionaire's son
who can put on dads old suit and tie and run a half dozen corporations into the ground

Jordan can win six titles and 5 MVP awards in the NBA
and go on to be a career .202 hitter with zero power in the lowest levels of professional baseball

Hey, they're both on TV a lot... So there's that too

I put that part in there about Trump not exactly being the best CEO out there....

for the express purpose of recognizing that Trump isn't Andrew Carnegie... to save you the time

Which you and Tweedle Dum klam didn't read, of course

I can't tell if I inadvertently just master trolled you two brain surgeons or not. I'll not count this one, mmkay?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:30 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
He's a CEO the same way Michael Jordan was a Baseball player...

Trump is really excellent at being a billionaire's son
who can put on dads old suit and tie and run a half dozen corporations into the ground

Jordan can win six titles and 5 MVP awards in the NBA
and go on to be a career .202 hitter with zero power in the lowest levels of professional baseball

Hey, they're both on TV a lot... So there's that too
I put that part in there about Trump not exactly being the best CEO out there....

for the express purpose of recognizing that Trump isn't Andrew Carnegie... to save you the time

Which you and Tweedle Dum klam didn't read, of course

I can't tell if I inadvertently just master trolled you two brain surgeons or not. I'll not count this one, mmkay?

Saying "not quite the best" isn't really capturing the true essence of it...

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:36 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
I put that part in there about Trump not exactly being the best CEO out there....

for the express purpose of recognizing that Trump isn't Andrew Carnegie... to save you the time

Which you and Tweedle Dum klam didn't read, of course

I can't tell if I inadvertently just master trolled you two brain surgeons or not. I'll not count this one, mmkay?

Saying "not quite the best" isn't really capturing the true essence of it...

Alrighty then Mr. Particular

Let me know when you WB/DR

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:15 am

Chizzang wrote:
kalm wrote:
All CEO's are like Trump?

What I DO like about his political ascension is it was a poke in the eye to the PC crowd and how candidates are SUPPOSED to act (Clinton was like this to a much lesser degree)...pomp and circumstance be damned...

That's a good thing.

But there's probably still a few CEO's not as full of shit and self interest out there.
He's a CEO the same way Michael Jordan was a Baseball player...

Trump is really excellent at being a billionaire's son
who can put on dads old suit and tie and run a half dozen corporations into the ground

Jordan can win six titles and 5 MVP awards in the NBA
and go on to be a career .202 hitter with zero power in the lowest levels of professional baseball

Hey, they're both on TV a lot... So there's that too

There goes Chizz...again.

Trump's dad wasn't a billionaire...not even close.

Post by **HI54UNI** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:38 am

He paid $38 million on $150 million in income. Other libs are slamming Rachel for her epic fail.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:52 am

CID1990 wrote:
Pwns wrote:If this is legit and not some kind of tease, I will predict there will not be any major conflicts of interest but will be some pretty unflattering things.
Anybody with the amount of real estate investments he has is going to have conflicts of interest

That's why I keep saying this is going to be a very interesting 4 years - because our government over time has been designed to make sure that nobody who actually makes things or navigates our financial structures would want the job. It just isn't set up for a Trump or a Gates or a Carnegie or Rockerfeller. Think of it as job security for career politicians who only know how to schmooze Big Defense and Big Labor and not much else

Trump's track record shows he hasn't always been the most adept person at navigating the private sector either - but that's not the point -

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

Establishment politicians both left and right are going to do their best to make sure it doesn't happen

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The President is certainly doing his part to help diminish the mystique of the bidnizman as the ultimate in leadership.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:55 am

HI54UNI wrote: He paid $38 million on $150 million in income. Other libs are slamming Rachel for her epic fail.

$150,000,000 in income? And this guy is supposed to be a billionaire?

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:56 am

houndawg wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Anybody with the amount of real estate investments he has is going to have conflicts of interest

That's why I keep saying this is going to be a very interesting 4 years - because our government over time has been designed to make sure that nobody who actually makes things or navigates our financial structures would want the job. It just isn't set up for a Trump or a Gates or a Carnegie or Rockerfeller. Think of it as job security for career politicians who only know how to schmooze Big Defense and Big Labor and not much else

Trump's track record shows he hasn't always been the most adept person at navigating the private sector either - but that's not the point -

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

Establishment politicians both left and right are going to do their best to make sure it doesn't happen

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The President is certainly doing his part to help diminish the mystique of the bidnizman as the ultimate in leadership.

I'll just loop you in with Winkin and Blinkin on not getting the point

(hint: it isn't about Trump. It's about the idea of A Trump.)

I think I'll name you Stinkin

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:02 am

CID1990 wrote:
houndawg wrote:
The President is certainly doing his part to help diminish the mystique of the bidnizman as the ultimate in leadership.
I'll just loop you in with Winkin and Blinkin on not getting the point

(hint: it isn't about Trump. It's about the idea of A Trump.)

I think I'll name you Stinkin

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

exactly what I addressed.

We need a fourth, you can be Thinkin. You need the practice.

Post by **Ivytalk** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:10 am

What a non-story. Now if Maddow claimed to have turned straight, THAT would be a story.

Post by **HI54UNI** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:26 am

Ivytalk wrote:What a non-story. Now if Maddow admitted to being a tranny, THAT would be a story.

FIFY

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:27 am

2 pages?? Really?? That's it??

#TrumpTroll

Post by **HI54UNI** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:28 am

I wonder if we will see Tripp come back to this thread?

And I wonder what the odds are that Trump's team set this whole thing up...

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:31 am

Ivytalk wrote:What a non-story. Now if Maddow claimed to have turned straight, THAT would be a story.

Or got gender reassigned to a woman

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:32 am

CID1990 wrote:
houndawg wrote:
The President is certainly doing his part to help diminish the mystique of the bidnizman as the ultimate in leadership.
I'll just loop you in with Winkin and Blinkin on not getting the point

(hint: it isn't about Trump. It's about the idea of A Trump.)

I think I'll name you Stinkin

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You first lumped Trump in with Gates, Rockefeller, and Carnegie and then wrote this...

The next 4 years will determine whether the "CEO President" is a viable thing

O...K...

Welcome to the unfairly misunderstood club, I guess...

Post by **Ivytalk** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:33 am

HI54UNI wrote:I wonder if we will see Tripp come back to this thread?

And I wonder what the odds are that Trump's team set this whole thing up...

Linda Tripp? I'd forgotten all about her.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns

Re: MSNBC: We Have Trumps Tax Returns