Page 1 of 3
Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:09 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
She is running out of holes for Trump and the Republicans to shove shit in.
Tomorrow shes going to wake up with Syria shoved in her ass and then Gorsuch jammed down her throat..........

Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:57 pm
by Chizzang
Yeah that Trump is showing everybody how things are done in Washington DC
He's got everything under control

Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:59 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Agreed
He baits news outlets
Gets his Supreme Court nominee through
Takes care of Syria
He OWNS Washington
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:46 pm
by JohnStOnge
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Agreed
He baits news outlets
Gets his Supreme Court nominee through
Takes care of Syria
He OWNS Washington
it was a given that he was going to get his Supreme Court nominee through. That was never in doubt because the Republicans in the Senate said from the beginning that they were going to change the rules if necessary.
But, while I do think the Syria strike will probably help his approval ratings, he has not "taken care" of Syria. And he does not own Washington.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:28 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Reid changed the rules, nice try Trump hater
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:56 pm
by JohnStOnge
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Reid changed the rules, nice try Trump hater
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Yes Reid changed some rules then McConnell changed a rule. All I'm saying is that there was no doubt that the Supreme Court nominee was going to be confirmed because the Republicans control the Senate and they made it clear they were going to change the rule if necessary.
I have no strong feelings on changing the rules on cloture per se. Frankly what I wish is that there was a Constitutional provision requiring 2/3 super majorities in both houses of Congress to do anything. Make a law. Confirm a nominee. Adopt a budget. Anything. I think we'd have a better country right now if that had always been the case. That way nothing would happen unless there was broad societal consensus that it should happen.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 2:46 am
by houndawg
JohnStOnge wrote:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Reid changed the rules, nice try Trump hater
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Yes Reid changed some rules then McConnell changed a rule. All I'm saying is that there was no doubt that the Supreme Court nominee was going to be confirmed because the Republicans control the Senate and they made it clear they were going to change the rule if necessary.
I have no strong feelings on changing the rules on cloture per se. Frankly what I wish is that there was a Constitutional provision requiring 2/3 super majorities in both houses of Congress to do anything. Make a law. Confirm a nominee. Adopt a budget. Anything. I think we'd have a better country right now if that had always been the case. That way nothing would happen unless there was broad societal consensus that it should happen.
Its one of those things that can hurt you now and help you later. In a couple of years you'll hear conks sniveling about how its killing them
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 3:50 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Wrong again, we deal with it like men, we play by the rules.
Kinda like all you pussys stopping traffic in the streets because you are still cryin after that ass kicking Trump gave you........and continues to give.
We never did that shit when the community organizer was elected.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 5:53 pm
by JohnStOnge
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Wrong again, we deal with it like men, we play by the rules.
Kinda like all you pussys stopping traffic in the streets because you are still cryin after that ass kicking Trump gave you........and continues to give.
We never did that **** when the community organizer was elected.
The "pussys" you're talking about are probably going to win in the long run. And a bunch of conservatives being stupid enough to vote for Trump increased the likelihood.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 7:24 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Guns will win, they always do.............look at Syria.
You guys are on the wrong end of this.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:08 am
by Gil Dobie
Chizzang wrote:Yeah that Trump is showing everybody how things are done in Washington DC
He's got everything under control

Has Trump even been to Washington since the inauguration. All I hear about is his golfing in Florida and how expensive it is to keep Trump Tower staffed with the secret service.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:10 am
by Gil Dobie
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Guns will win, they always do.............look at Syria.
You guys are on the wrong end of this.
Guns don't kill people, people driving and texting on cell phones kill people. Send the Syrians cell phones and automobiles.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:53 pm
by BDKJMU
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 12:03 pm
by andy7171
BDKJMU wrote:

I was about to post this.
She's got to lay off the sauce a bit before her speeches THEN jump on the booze train!
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 12:57 pm
by Skjellyfetti
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
Takes care of Syria
Yeah, I'm sure that is all over and done with now.

Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:39 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
It should be as far as we are concerned. It's none of our business and we need to let them deal with it.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:27 pm
by Skjellyfetti
So, you applaud his escalation... but, think we should not be involved at all there.

Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:57 pm
by dbackjon
So Alphie wants to double penetrate Pelosi? She is a step up from your last.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:00 am
by CitadelGrad
I don't think Nancy is on the sauce. I think she's just fucked in the head, much like Maxine Waters.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:54 pm
by BDKJMU
Feb:
Today

Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 2:00 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Skjellyfetti wrote:So, you applaud his escalation... but, think we should not be involved at all there.

Show me one post where I agreed with bombing Syria EVER!
Its not our problem, we shouldnt be there, I dont care that they are gassing women and children, that means less people trying to blow us up as far as I am concerned. We need to mind our own business but if we really have to kick a countries ass I vote Mexico, bring our troops back and take over that POS so we can enforce immigration.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:17 pm
by AZGrizFan
houndawg wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:
Yes Reid changed some rules then McConnell changed a rule. All I'm saying is that there was no doubt that the Supreme Court nominee was going to be confirmed because the Republicans control the Senate and they made it clear they were going to change the rule if necessary.
I have no strong feelings on changing the rules on cloture per se. Frankly what I wish is that there was a Constitutional provision requiring 2/3 super majorities in both houses of Congress to do anything. Make a law. Confirm a nominee. Adopt a budget. Anything. I think we'd have a better country right now if that had always been the case. That way nothing would happen unless there was broad societal consensus that it should happen.
Its one of those things that can hurt you now and help you later. In a couple of years you'll hear conks sniveling about how its killing them
that's pretty funny. Because when REID changed the rule conks said the same thing..."in a few years when it comes back to bite them in the ass you'll hear them all bitching"....and here you are. Right on que.

Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:33 pm
by cx500d
JohnStOnge wrote:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Reid changed the rules, nice try Trump hater
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Frankly what I wish is that there was a Constitutional provision requiring 2/3 super majorities in both houses of Congress to do anything. Make a law. Confirm a nominee. Adopt a budget. Anything. I think we'd have a better country right now if that had always been the case. That way nothing would happen unless there was broad societal consensus that it should happen.
That is like guaranteeing nothing would ever get done. We couldn't pass shit with a simple majority, how could we expect to ever achieve a supermajority? It's so polarized now, the only way we would get anything done is with term limits so the politicians don't have as much to lose; they know they are done in 6 years, say.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Nancy
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:40 pm
by AZGrizFan
cx500d wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:
Frankly what I wish is that there was a Constitutional provision requiring 2/3 super majorities in both houses of Congress to do anything. Make a law. Confirm a nominee. Adopt a budget. Anything. I think we'd have a better country right now if that had always been the case. That way nothing would happen unless there was broad societal consensus that it should happen.
That is like guaranteeing nothing would ever get done. We couldn't pass shit with a simple majority, how could we expect to ever achieve a supermajority? It's so polarized now, the only way we would get anything done is with term limits so the politicians don't have as much to lose; they know they are done in 6 years, say.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
We're 100x better off when they get nothing done. The LAST time they "got something done" we were saddled with the mess that is Obamacare.
Re: Nancy "Double Penetration" Pelosi
Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 3:53 am
by houndawg
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Wrong again, we deal with it like men, we play by the rules.
Kinda like all you pussys stopping traffic in the streets because you are still cryin after that ass kicking Trump gave you........and continues to give.
We never did that **** when the community organizer was elected.
yeah, sucker-punching girls is less risky.
