Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

They don't need to be told what offends them. That's why Trump won the election.

Trump won the Electoral College
He lost the election

StWrong

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

The Chinese breach is well known and well documented

What is at issue here is that you tied it into Hillary’s security violations. As egregious as she was I haven’t seen any evidence that her intentional spillage of classified had anything to do with the disaster in China


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I find it odd that CIA so casually revealed the disaster and took responsibility for it. This is an organization whose currency is anything but transparency. They are as afraid of bad publicity as the U.S. military is and are always in fear of the next Frank Church.

So who was actually held accountable? Nobody I'm aware of. CIA's admission was the equivalent of an, "Oops, my bad."

We know that CIA is very much a part of the deep state. Clapper, Brennan and many others had a vested interest in seeing Hillary win. CIA's casual acknowledgement seems like a cover for Hillary.

That’s a HUGE stretch based solely on your gut feeling. CIA communications systems are not known to exec branch principals other than the Director. The worst breach on Hillary’s server was geospatial data. That was bad, but there was no nexus with CIA media

This was a case of hacking abilities on the part of our enemies outpacing our own systems. The CIA got stung.

You do remember China hacking into everybody’s SF-86 info don’t you? Anyone who has ever applied for a clearance having their personal info exposed to Beijing? Do you reckon there could be a nexus there? It would be tenuous at best but it is a hell of a lot more plausible than Hillary talking about CIA reporting networks on her emails, which she didn’t do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

I find it odd that CIA so casually revealed the disaster and took responsibility for it. This is an organization whose currency is anything but transparency. They are as afraid of bad publicity as the U.S. military is and are always in fear of the next Frank Church.

So who was actually held accountable? Nobody I'm aware of. CIA's admission was the equivalent of an, "Oops, my bad."

We know that CIA is very much a part of the deep state. Clapper, Brennan and many others had a vested interest in seeing Hillary win. CIA's casual acknowledgement seems like a cover for Hillary.

That’s a HUGE stretch based solely on your gut feeling. CIA communications systems are not known to exec branch principals other than the Director. The worst breach on Hillary’s server was geospatial data. That was bad, but there was no nexus with CIA media

This was a case of hacking abilities on the part of our enemies outpacing our own systems. The CIA got stung.

You do remember China hacking into everybody’s SF-86 info don’t you? Anyone who has ever applied for a clearance having their personal info exposed to Beijing? Do you reckon there could be a nexus there? It would be tenuous at best but it is a hell of a lot more plausible than Hillary talking about CIA reporting networks on her emails, which she didn’t do.

She's become the actual boogeyman
the living embodiment if a fictional character
Habitatin' rent free in the minds of crazed Republicans



Between her and Tits McGee Ocasio we've got a full line card

[CID1990]

That’s a HUGE stretch based solely on your gut feeling. CIA communications systems are not known to exec branch principals other than the Director. The worst breach on Hillary’s server was geospatial data. That was bad, but there was no nexus with CIA media

This was a case of hacking abilities on the part of our enemies outpacing our own systems. The CIA got stung.

You do remember China hacking into everybody’s SF-86 info don’t you? Anyone who has ever applied for a clearance having their personal info exposed to Beijing? Do you reckon there could be a nexus there? It would be tenuous at best but it is a hell of a lot more plausible than Hillary talking about CIA reporting networks on her emails, which she didn’t do.

She's become the actual boogeyman
the living embodiment if a fictional character
Habitatin' rent free in the minds of crazed Republicans



Between her and Tits McGee Ocasio we've got a full line card

She's not a boogeyman to me.

Just an entitled politician with only her own interests at heart. And she broke the law in a way that would see me out of a job and with a criminal record. That tends to chap my ass.

[El Griz]

SHE has broken the law in a way that would get you fired? That would mean that being part of the Trump family would be immediate prison time. Oh wait, money buys time. (but not much longer).

[CID1990]

SHE has broken the law in a way that would get you fired? That would mean that being part of the Trump family would be immediate prison time. Oh wait, money buys time. (but not much longer).

Your whataboutism aside, we are discussing Hillary Clinton.

She allowed for classified info to be stored in an unsecured manner. Since she was my actual boss for 4 years, and held me to a higher standard than she held herself, I think my comments are pertinent without having to caveat all the other unindicted criminals in the country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

SHE has broken the law in a way that would get you fired? That would mean that being part of the Trump family would be immediate prison time. Oh wait, money buys time. (but not much longer).

Yeah, we will keep waiting........and waiting, and waiting.

[Skjellyfetti]

[CID1990]

I gotta tell ya-

The Jews must be doing something right.. both the far right and the far left hate them

[CitadelGrad]

I find it odd that CIA so casually revealed the disaster and took responsibility for it. This is an organization whose currency is anything but transparency. They are as afraid of bad publicity as the U.S. military is and are always in fear of the next Frank Church.

So who was actually held accountable? Nobody I'm aware of. CIA's admission was the equivalent of an, "Oops, my bad."

We know that CIA is very much a part of the deep state. Clapper, Brennan and many others had a vested interest in seeing Hillary win. CIA's casual acknowledgement seems like a cover for Hillary.

That’s a HUGE stretch based solely on your gut feeling. CIA communications systems are not known to exec branch principals other than the Director. The worst breach on Hillary’s server was geospatial data. That was bad, but there was no nexus with CIA media

This was a case of hacking abilities on the part of our enemies outpacing our own systems. The CIA got stung.

You do remember China hacking into everybody’s SF-86 info don’t you? Anyone who has ever applied for a clearance having their personal info exposed to Beijing? Do you reckon there could be a nexus there? It would be tenuous at best but it is a hell of a lot more plausible than Hillary talking about CIA reporting networks on her emails, which she didn’t do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How do you know what was in those emails? Did she let you review them before she scrubbed them?

[CID1990]

Of course not.

I know that Langley commo systems and methods are not known to even most Langley employees - much less DoS principals.

The Chinese incident was a cybersecurity one - the Chinese hacked them through the CIA’s less secure system for new contacts.

On a related note, how did you know your Air Force pilots had been to flight school?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

That’s a HUGE stretch based solely on your gut feeling. CIA communications systems are not known to exec branch principals other than the Director. The worst breach on Hillary’s server was geospatial data. That was bad, but there was no nexus with CIA media

This was a case of hacking abilities on the part of our enemies outpacing our own systems. The CIA got stung.

You do remember China hacking into everybody’s SF-86 info don’t you? Anyone who has ever applied for a clearance having their personal info exposed to Beijing? Do you reckon there could be a nexus there? It would be tenuous at best but it is a hell of a lot more plausible than Hillary talking about CIA reporting networks on her emails, which she didn’t do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How do you know what was in those emails? Did she let you review them before she scrubbed them?

hey - don't forget about me. I'm still waiting for proof that the Chinese murdered every HUMINT asset b/c of HRCs emails.

[Grizalltheway]

How do you know what was in those emails? Did she let you review them before she scrubbed them?

hey - don't forget about me. I'm still waiting for proof that the Chinese murdered every HUMINT asset b/c of HRCs emails.

We all are, Timmy. We all are.

[Chizzang]

[CitadelGrad]

How do you know what was in those emails? Did she let you review them before she scrubbed them?

hey - don't forget about me. I'm still waiting for proof that the Chinese murdered every HUMINT asset b/c of HRCs emails.

There is no proof. That's kind of the point. The deep state will do everything to prevent Hillary from accountability for any consequences of her actions. You have heard of Brennan, Comey and Lynch, haven't you?

[Skjellyfetti]

Is IG Horowitz Deep State or no?

[Ibanez]

hey - don't forget about me. I'm still waiting for proof that the Chinese murdered every HUMINT asset b/c of HRCs emails.

There is no proof. That's kind of the point. The deep state will do everything to prevent Hillary from accountability for any consequences of her actions. You have heard of Brennan, Comey and Lynch, haven't you?

But that's not what you said. You said:

For additional context, Hillary Clinton had more than 30,000 emails on an unsecure server. Those emails were acquired by China. Not long after, every U.S. HUMINT asset in China was arrested and executed. Hillary was exonerated by Comey even before he interviewed her.

Are you saying it's Comey, Lynch and Brennan's fault that you have zero proof? Because the deep state is so powerful?

If there's no proof, then where did you get the idea that, and I quote:

every U.S. HUMINT asset in China was arrested and executed.

[Ibanez]

Is IG Horowitz Deep State or no?

He is, yes, 100%. But we have no proof of that.

But you know he is!

[dbackjon]

hey - don't forget about me. I'm still waiting for proof that the Chinese murdered every HUMINT asset b/c of HRCs emails.

There is no proof. That's kind of the point. The deep state will do everything to prevent Hillary from accountability for any consequences of her actions. You have heard of Brennan, Comey and Lynch, haven't you?

Start calling you ExpandHagood

[dbackjon]

Is IG Horowitz Deep State or no?

He is, yes, 100%. But we have no proof of that.

But you know he is!

Why hasn't the deep state eliminated Citgrad yet? Or Trump? Why didn't Hillary win? Hmmmmm

[Chizzang]

He is, yes, 100%. But we have no proof of that.

But you know he is!

Why hasn't the deep state eliminated Citgrad yet? Or Trump? Why didn't Hillary win? Hmmmmm

reasons

[AZGrizFan]

He is, yes, 100%. But we have no proof of that.

But you know he is!

Why hasn't the deep state eliminated Citgrad yet? Or Trump? Why didn't Hillary win? Hmmmmm

Because she's a fat, evil cunt...

Oh, I'm sorry. Those were rhetorical?

[Ibanez]

Why hasn't the deep state eliminated Citgrad yet? Or Trump? Why didn't Hillary win? Hmmmmm

Because she's a fat, evil cunt...

Oh, I'm sorry. Those were rhetorical?

Because high cholesterol and diabetes will get her?

[Winterborn]

[Winterborn]