Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

dbackjon wrote:

And vice versa. When are they going to find something, Jon? You know, 33,000 deleted emails, or destroyed servers, or something actual criminal?

AZGrizFan wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

And vice versa. When are they going to find something, Jon? You know, 33,000 deleted emails, or destroyed servers, or something actual criminal?

The GOP conducted multiple investigations, as did the DOJ. Nothing came of it. Maybe because NO CRIME was committed?

The GOP did `11 investigations on Benghazi. Zero on the 4 dead Green Berets in Niger.


Stop with the both sides crap. No, the Democrats aren't perfect, but they don't alter evidence, waste millions on multiple investigations of the same subject, or tell 20 lies a day.

dbackjon wrote:Stop with the both sides crap.

Spoken like a true partisan.

89Hen wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Stop with the both sides crap.

Spoken like a true partisan.

The Clinton Foundation was a shining beacon of hope on a golden hilltop for dback.

dbackjon wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And vice versa. When are they going to find something, Jon? You know, 33,000 deleted emails, or destroyed servers, or something actual criminal?

The GOP conducted multiple investigations, as did the DOJ. Nothing came of it. Maybe because NO CRIME was committed?

The GOP did `11 investigations on Benghazi. Zero on the 4 dead Green Berets in Niger.


Stop with the both sides crap. No, the Democrats aren't perfect, but they don't alter evidence, waste millions on multiple investigations of the same subject, or tell 20 lies a day.

I guess racketeering, wire fraud, sending sexually explicit pictures to minors, money laundering, mail fraud, corruption, child pornography, voter fraud, extortion, accepting bribes, ABSCAM, are all acceptable. Because those are just some of the crimes that Democrats in Congress have been convicted of since the 1980s through Obama's Administration.

Trying to justify crime isn't a position anyone should take.

GannonFan wrote:

89Hen wrote: Spoken like a true partisan.

The Clinton Foundation was a shining beacon of dope on a golden shower for dback.

FIFY

dbackjon wrote: Stop with the both sides crap. No, the Democrats aren't perfect, but they don't alter evidence, waste millions on multiple investigations of the same subject, or tell 20 lies a day.

I have some swamp land in Florida for sale.

GannonFan wrote:

89Hen wrote: Spoken like a true partisan.

The Clinton Foundation was a shining beacon of hope on a golden hilltop for dback.

You mean the A rated Clinton Foundation - the one that WASN'T shut down for fraud?


This last two posts illustrate my point exactly.

dbackjon wrote:

GannonFan wrote:
The Clinton Foundation was a shining beacon of hope on a golden hilltop for dback.

You mean the A rated Clinton Foundation - the one that WASN'T shut down for fraud?


This last two posts illustrate my point exactly.

Heck, even ABC News (note, not a right wing news source by most accounts) called them out for fraud back in October of 2016 relative to the whole debacle with Haiti relief and the prioritizing of Friends of Bill for those contracts. And Bill famously said they'd stop receiving foreign money to the Foundation once Hillary was sworn in. And with her not in the White House fundraising for the Foundation has faltered. Hillary is lucky that Trump is so loud and so distracting, especially with the number of crooks in his campaign and administration, and with his 24/7 lying. We don't possibly have the resources to go after every single bad actor. Heck, Mueller is still investigating what people call a stolen election now more than 2+ years from when it happened and we've even had a federal election since that stolen one.

Are you allowed two hecks in one post?

89Hen wrote:Are you allowed two hecks in one post?

By all means, NO.

dbackjon wrote:

GannonFan wrote:
The Clinton Foundation was a shining beacon of hope on a golden hilltop for dback.

You mean the A rated Clinton Foundation - the one that WASN'T shut down for fraud?


This last two posts illustrate my point exactly.

Which company gave them a A rating. If I remember correctly, there was some trickery with that company.

SeattleGriz wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

You mean the A rated Clinton Foundation - the one that WASN'T shut down for fraud?


This last two posts illustrate my point exactly.

Which company gave them a A rating. If I remember correctly, there was some trickery with that company.

I don't know Charity Navigator's rating website rating is, but here you go.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index. ... rgid=16680

Grizalltheway wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Which company gave them a A rating. If I remember correctly, there was some trickery with that company.

I don't know Charity Navigator's rating website rating is, but here you go.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index. ... rgid=16680

Thank you for the link.

dbackjon wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
And vice versa. When are they going to find something, Jon? You know, 33,000 deleted emails, or destroyed servers, or something actual criminal?

The GOP conducted multiple investigations, as did the DOJ. Nothing came of it. Maybe because NO CRIME was committed?

The GOP did `11 investigations on Benghazi. Zero on the 4 dead Green Berets in Niger.


Stop with the both sides crap. No, the Democrats aren't perfect, but they don't alter evidence, waste millions on multiple investigations of the same subject, or tell 20 lies a day.

There are a lot of false equivalencies in there but the biggest problem is with your assertion that there was no crime. Hillary is an un-indicted felon just as I am certain Trump is with his hush money. Except that the emails had national security implications.

I sure do hear a lot of squealing and moaning about the “both sides” arguments coming from the left. It almost would lead one to believe that the lefties are more blindly partisan


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gil Dobie wrote:

Oh Jesus. We should lock up the morons that make memes like this.

Ibanez wrote:Oh Jesus. We should lock up the morons that make memes like this.

Stifling free speech? How liberal of you.

AZGrizFan wrote:

89Hen wrote:Are you allowed two hecks in one post?

By all means, NO.

It's a double heck - I only save those for the rare post.

89Hen wrote:

Ibanez wrote:Oh Jesus. We should lock up the morons that make memes like this.

Stifling free speech? How liberal of you.

I'll be honest...someone people are so partisan and idiotic, they shouldn't be allowed in Gen Pop.

Ibanez wrote:

89Hen wrote: Stifling free speech? How liberal of you.

I'll be honest...someone people are so partisan and idiotic, they shouldn't be allowed in Gen Pop.

The Benghazi comparison is stupid but I get the point - did they really need to send a tactical team to arrest Roger Stone?