Terror attack in Barcelona
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:08 pm
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=47926
CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, Wolf Blitzer wonders if the attacker was inspired by Charlottesville
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/w ... ttesville/
"I think it’s more likely people will ask whether Wolf ate paint chips as a kid."
LAWL
What would I need to spin?andy7171 wrote:I can hardly wait to see how dback spins this one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity.Jjoey52 wrote:Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I see what you are trying to do, but no.Chizzang wrote:BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z
I call bullsh!t
Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)
Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists
OWN YOUR SH!T
This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat
Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES
The KKK has committed one terrorist attack?Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1
Okay,CAA Flagship wrote:I see what you are trying to do, but no.Chizzang wrote:BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z
I call bullsh!t
Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)
Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists
OWN YOUR SH!T
This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat
Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES![]()
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?
Vidav wrote:He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity.Jjoey52 wrote:Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1
And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.
Who cares, he was a fuckheadJohnStOnge wrote:That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1
And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.
Sure, okayALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Who cares, he was a fuckheadJohnStOnge wrote:
That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.
SemanticsChizzang wrote:Sure, okayALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Who cares, he was a fuckhead
But it matters because I ain't even gonna start letting Islamic terrorists off the hook at "Who cares"
![]()
It matters who what where and why
I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.Chizzang wrote:Okay,CAA Flagship wrote: I see what you are trying to do, but no.![]()
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard
Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe
This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that
But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding
Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract
all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing
So you agree with Obama...CAA Flagship wrote:I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.Chizzang wrote:
Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard
Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe
This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that
But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding
Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract
all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing
It's related, yes. That is one generalization that is hard to argue with.Chizzang wrote:So you agree with Obama...CAA Flagship wrote: I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.
Jihadist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam then