Page 1 of 2

Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:08 pm
by Pwns

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:09 pm
by Pwns
Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:12 pm
by CID1990
Meanwhile, Wolf Blitzer wonders if the attacker was inspired by Charlottesville

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/w ... ttesville/

"I think it’s more likely people will ask whether Wolf ate paint chips as a kid."

LAWL

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:59 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
It's like letting a rapist into your home then being surprised that he rapes your daughter.......... #NoSympathy4TheStupid

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:10 pm
by andy7171
I can hardly wait to see how dback spins this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:14 pm
by Jjoey52
Islam, the religion of peace.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:24 pm
by dbackjon
CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, Wolf Blitzer wonders if the attacker was inspired by Charlottesville

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/w ... ttesville/

"I think it’s more likely people will ask whether Wolf ate paint chips as a kid."

LAWL

Pretty sure he did. What an idiotic comment.

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:25 pm
by dbackjon
andy7171 wrote:I can hardly wait to see how dback spins this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What would I need to spin?

Religious terrorism is terrorism.

Just like the "Christian" Terrorism in Charlottesville. Neither represent the religion they claim to follow.

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:28 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Yep, there it was.....like a fucking top

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:35 pm
by Jjoey52
Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:38 pm
by Vidav
Jjoey52 wrote:Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity. :?

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:54 pm
by Chizzang
BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity and con artists (and to a lesser degree) lunatics

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:00 pm
by CAA Flagship
Chizzang wrote:BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES
I see what you are trying to do, but no. :tothehand:
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:33 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1
The KKK has committed one terrorist attack? :?

What are we working with here? This year?

Why such a vague and worldwide description: "Islamist" vs specific and confined to US: "KKK" ?

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:34 pm
by Chizzang
CAA Flagship wrote:
Chizzang wrote:BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES
I see what you are trying to do, but no. :tothehand:
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?
Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:45 pm
by JohnStOnge
I can remember years ago before this kind of thing started using it as a scenario in which people could take out large numbers of people without having to use a gun. You know, same old thing where people would say guns are the problem. My take has always been that if there were no guns people who wanted to do large casualty attacks could find other ways to do it. And years ago I said/wrote that they could do something like smash into crowds with vehicles.

The weapon of choice or the weapon available is a tool. It's not the problem.

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:57 pm
by Jjoey52
Vidav wrote:
Jjoey52 wrote:Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity. :?

Missed that, thanks


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:59 pm
by Pwns
So is Europe going to do something about these attacks or just shrug their shoulders and write of off as collateral damage for multiculturalism?

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:03 pm
by JohnStOnge
Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.
That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.

Re: RE: Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:44 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
JohnStOnge wrote:
Pwns wrote:Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.
That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.
Who cares, he was a fuckhead

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:22 pm
by Chizzang
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.
Who cares, he was a fuckhead
Sure, okay
But it matters because I ain't even gonna start letting Islamic terrorists off the hook at "Who cares"

:nod:

It matters who what where and why

Re: RE: Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:50 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Chizzang wrote:
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Who cares, he was a fuckhead
Sure, okay
But it matters because I ain't even gonna start letting Islamic terrorists off the hook at "Who cares"

:nod:

It matters who what where and why
Semantics

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:00 am
by CAA Flagship
Chizzang wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: I see what you are trying to do, but no. :tothehand:
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?
Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing
I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:09 am
by Chizzang
CAA Flagship wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing
I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.
So you agree with Obama...
Jihadist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam then

:coffee:

Re: Terror attack in Barcelona

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:27 am
by CAA Flagship
Chizzang wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.
So you agree with Obama...
Jihadist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam then

:coffee:
It's related, yes. That is one generalization that is hard to argue with.

I'm just saying that relating Conservatism to Nazis is a stretch. If you think there is a part of Conservatism that is related to Nazis, then use that part as a label.