Trump pardons Sheriff Arpaio.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:17 pm
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=47967
Solace.∞∞∞ wrote:Awful. Arpaio is convicted for contempt of court; he flat out refused to follow a judge's order, boastingly admitted it, and goes free?
Whatever though, like Trump and co., he's just another person that'll go down in American history as a terrible person and just a piece of **** in general. That's the only solice I take with this administration and friends: history will be extremely unkind to them all.
Ivytalk wrote:Solace.∞∞∞ wrote:Awful. Arpaio is convicted for contempt of court; he flat out refused to follow a judge's order, boastingly admitted it, and goes free?
Whatever though, like Trump and co., he's just another person that'll go down in American history as a terrible person and just a piece of **** in general. That's the only solice I take with this administration and friends: history will be extremely unkind to them all.
You're welcome.
Just continuing to make liberals become completely unhinged..Ivytalk wrote:Pandering to the base...![]()
And a rock-stupid base it is.
BDKJMU wrote:Just continuing to make liberals become completely unhinged..Ivytalk wrote:Pandering to the base...![]()
And a rock-stupid base it is.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this selective outrage∞∞∞ wrote:Awful. Arpaio is convicted for contempt of court; he flat out refused to follow a judge's order, boastingly admitted it, and goes free?
Whatever though, like Trump and co., he's just another person that'll go down in American history as a terrible person and just a piece of **** in general. That's the only solice I take with this administration and friends: history will be extremely unkind to them all.
CID1990 wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this selective outrage∞∞∞ wrote:Awful. Arpaio is convicted for contempt of court; he flat out refused to follow a judge's order, boastingly admitted it, and goes free?
Whatever though, like Trump and co., he's just another person that'll go down in American history as a terrible person and just a piece of **** in general. That's the only solice I take with this administration and friends: history will be extremely unkind to them all.
Given that I dont recall you saying anything about Eric Holder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Arpaio willfully ignored the orders of a federal judge, in direct contradiction of the constitution, and without the advice of the DOJ. Instead of going through the proper channel of appeals, he did what he wanted.CID1990 wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this selective outrage∞∞∞ wrote:Awful. Arpaio is convicted for contempt of court; he flat out refused to follow a judge's order, boastingly admitted it, and goes free?
Whatever though, like Trump and co., he's just another person that'll go down in American history as a terrible person and just a piece of **** in general. That's the only solice I take with this administration and friends: history will be extremely unkind to them all.
Given that I dont recall you saying anything about Eric Holder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which is hardly different∞∞∞ wrote:Arpaio willfully ignored the orders of a federal judge, in direct contradiction of the constitution, and without the advice of the DOJ. Instead of going through the proper channel of appeals, he did what he wanted.CID1990 wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this selective outrage
Given that I dont recall you saying anything about Eric Holder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is not pardoning after time served or following reform; it's a complete dismissal of the law.
From now on, should I worry about law enforcement completely ignoring the law because they believe in the Almighty Trump? Will he just pardon anyone who blindly stands behind him?
Arpaio is far from a saint and IMO should not have been pardoned but Holder wasn't a saint either.∞∞∞ wrote:Arpaio willfully ignored the orders of a federal judge, in direct contradiction of the constitution, and without the advice of the DOJ. Instead of going through the proper channel of appeals, he did what he wanted.CID1990 wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this selective outrage
Given that I dont recall you saying anything about Eric Holder
This is not pardoning after time served or following reform; it's a complete dismissal of the law.
From now on, should I worry about law enforcement completely ignoring the law because they believe in the Almighty Trump? Will he just pardon anyone who blindly stands behind him?
I'm not a fan of Arpaio, either - personally I don't think he deserved a pardonUNI88 wrote:Arpaio is far from a saint and IMO should not have been pardoned but Holder wasn't a saint either.∞∞∞ wrote: Arpaio willfully ignored the orders of a federal judge, in direct contradiction of the constitution, and without the advice of the DOJ. Instead of going through the proper channel of appeals, he did what he wanted.
This is not pardoning after time served or following reform; it's a complete dismissal of the law.
From now on, should I worry about law enforcement completely ignoring the law because they believe in the Almighty Trump? Will he just pardon anyone who blindly stands behind him?
It is interesting and hypocritical how those on the left and right rationalize the actions of political leaders on their "side" while criticizing and calling for criminal prosecution of similar actions by those on the other "side."
Agree with both of you. The VW engineer gets convicted but not one single Wall Street exec.CID1990 wrote:I'm not a fan of Arpaio, either - personally I don't think he deserved a pardonUNI88 wrote: Arpaio is far from a saint and IMO should not have been pardoned but Holder wasn't a saint either.
It is interesting and hypocritical how those on the left and right rationalize the actions of political leaders on their "side" while criticizing and calling for criminal prosecution of similar actions by those on the other "side."
But let's not have any fresh wakes over the rule of law in this country
That ship has been gone from the dock for several years now -
And it's pretty obvious that triplesquiggly has a graduated scale of when contempt for the law is bad, and when it's not so bad
Yeah, but racism!UNI88 wrote:Arpaio is far from a saint and IMO should not have been pardoned but Holder wasn't a saint either.∞∞∞ wrote: Arpaio willfully ignored the orders of a federal judge, in direct contradiction of the constitution, and without the advice of the DOJ. Instead of going through the proper channel of appeals, he did what he wanted.
This is not pardoning after time served or following reform; it's a complete dismissal of the law.
From now on, should I worry about law enforcement completely ignoring the law because they believe in the Almighty Trump? Will he just pardon anyone who blindly stands behind him?
It is interesting and hypocritical how those on the left and right rationalize the actions of political leaders on their "side" while criticizing and calling for criminal prosecution of similar actions by those on the other "side."
Why is that a good thing?Jjoey52 wrote:BDKJMU wrote:
Just continuing to make liberals become completely unhinged..
Which is a good and entertaining thing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's a two way street. The far right and far left are mirror images of each other. Both like to criticize the other sides faults while failing to realize that they share very similar faults. How hypocritical and obtuse both sides are is humorous and a little frightening.Jjoey52 wrote:Because libs are so caught up in their self righteous stupidity they cannot handle reality.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk