Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Col Hogan wrote:Doesn't the Conservative, Christian negate the Gay...

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was so disturbed by the clash of protesters in Charlottesville that he made a policy decision he may have to reverse: In a speech at the State Department on August 19, he repudiated hatred and racism before addressing what he called “a great diversity gap” in employment and ambassadorships. He meant that there are too few employees and ambassadors who are “diverse” on account of their race, or ethnicity, or sex, or sexual orientation. He did not say how many of this or that diversity group the department needed among its employees or ambassadors to be sufficiently diverse. Tillerson’s point was simply that there must be more.

How to get more? Tillerson said there would be changes in the process used to recruit and hire employees and choose ambassadorships. The most important of those changes concerns ambassador selection.

“Every time we have an opening for an ambassador position, at least one of the candidates must be a minority candidate,” he said. Tillerson seemed to mean candidates who are black and Hispanic, but not Asian or other racial and ethnic minorities. The new policy could result in discrimination against a non-preferred minority candidate. Necessarily it will result in discrimination against someone lacking the “right” race or ethnicity but who is better qualified than the diversity candidate included in the competition for a particular ambassadorship.

Federal civil rights law and the Constitution would not seem to permit racial preferences in the selection of ambassadors and department employees. Someone needs to tell that to Tillerson. Perhaps Attorney General Sessions could do so.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Col Hogan wrote:Doesn't the Conservative, Christian negate the Gay...

Say what?

Skjellyfetti wrote:Thought this was a bit of a surprising statement from Tillerson

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was so disturbed by the clash of protesters in Charlottesville that he made a policy decision he may have to reverse: In a speech at the State Department on August 19, he repudiated hatred and racism before addressing what he called “a great diversity gap” in employment and ambassadorships. He meant that there are too few employees and ambassadors who are “diverse” on account of their race, or ethnicity, or sex, or sexual orientation. He did not say how many of this or that diversity group the department needed among its employees or ambassadors to be sufficiently diverse. Tillerson’s point was simply that there must be more.

How to get more? Tillerson said there would be changes in the process used to recruit and hire employees and choose ambassadorships. The most important of those changes concerns ambassador selection.

“Every time we have an opening for an ambassador position, at least one of the candidates must be a minority candidate,” he said. Tillerson seemed to mean candidates who are black and Hispanic, but not Asian or other racial and ethnic minorities. The new policy could result in discrimination against a non-preferred minority candidate. Necessarily it will result in discrimination against someone lacking the “right” race or ethnicity but who is better qualified than the diversity candidate included in the competition for a particular ambassadorship.

Federal civil rights law and the Constitution would not seem to permit racial preferences in the selection of ambassadors and department employees. Someone needs to tell that to Tillerson. Perhaps Attorney General Sessions could do so.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/why-does- ... le/2009539

CID1990 wrote:I've noticed that around the Foggy Bottom halls there hasn't been a lot of criticism of Trump's picks for Ambassadorships

Partly (probably) because they are pretty good. I haven't seen actual numbers yet, but it seems like there are more career types and less political contributors. Less than with the last three admins for sure. Yes, Callista Gingrich is AMB to the Holy See, but that's relatively insignificant.

Generally speaking, people with real policy chops are getting the nod, like the nominee to go to Berlin (he's gay, too):

https://diplopundit.net/2017/09/05/form ... o-germany/

There are things happening outside the limelight that are at least relatively encouraging. It might be that Americans really don't care that much about who goes to London or Berlin (foreign policy only matters in election years). Perhaps if they DID pay attention, we'd be getting Sarah Palin or Ted Nugent - so maybe it is a good thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

houndawg wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I've noticed that around the Foggy Bottom halls there hasn't been a lot of criticism of Trump's picks for Ambassadorships

Partly (probably) because they are pretty good. I haven't seen actual numbers yet, but it seems like there are more career types and less political contributors. Less than with the last three admins for sure. Yes, Callista Gingrich is AMB to the Holy See, but that's relatively insignificant.

Generally speaking, people with real policy chops are getting the nod, like the nominee to go to Berlin (he's gay, too):

https://diplopundit.net/2017/09/05/form ... o-germany/

There are things happening outside the limelight that are at least relatively encouraging. It might be that Americans really don't care that much about who goes to London or Berlin (foreign policy only matters in election years). Perhaps if they DID pay attention, we'd be getting Sarah Palin or Ted Nugent - so maybe it is a good thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Judging by his cabinet, the policy chops were accidental.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Thought this was a bit of a surprising statement from Tillerson

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was so disturbed by the clash of protesters in Charlottesville that he made a policy decision he may have to reverse: In a speech at the State Department on August 19, he repudiated hatred and racism before addressing what he called “a great diversity gap” in employment and ambassadorships. He meant that there are too few employees and ambassadors who are “diverse” on account of their race, or ethnicity, or sex, or sexual orientation. He did not say how many of this or that diversity group the department needed among its employees or ambassadors to be sufficiently diverse. Tillerson’s point was simply that there must be more.

How to get more? Tillerson said there would be changes in the process used to recruit and hire employees and choose ambassadorships. The most important of those changes concerns ambassador selection.

“Every time we have an opening for an ambassador position, at least one of the candidates must be a minority candidate,” he said. Tillerson seemed to mean candidates who are black and Hispanic, but not Asian or other racial and ethnic minorities. The new policy could result in discrimination against a non-preferred minority candidate. Necessarily it will result in discrimination against someone lacking the “right” race or ethnicity but who is better qualified than the diversity candidate included in the competition for a particular ambassadorship.

Federal civil rights law and the Constitution would not seem to permit racial preferences in the selection of ambassadors and department employees. Someone needs to tell that to Tillerson. Perhaps Attorney General Sessions could do so.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/why-does- ... le/2009539

CID1990 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Judging by his cabinet, the policy chops were accidental.

Like klam, you dont read too carefully



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk