Page 1 of 3

This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:04 pm
by CSUBUCDAD
All along. Took less that 100 days to drop the word WAR. Pitiful. More examples of the lefts inability to call a spade a spade.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:08 pm
by Wedgebuster
Image

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:17 pm
by hank scorpio
Where is an english professor when you need one?

War A conflict involving the organized use of arms and physical force between countries or other large-scale armed groups. The warring parties hold territory, which they can win or lose; and each has a leading person or organization which can surrender, or collapse, thus ending the war.

on in the state of being active, functioning or operating

Terror Extreme or intense fear.
Something that causes such fear.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:21 pm
by slycat
No they dropped the phrase "war on terror". This is a good thing. Bush used to to rally fear about Iraq and start a war there. The only "war on terror " we have is the one in Afghanistan and I'm thinking like the war on drugs it is a war that can not be possibly won.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:33 pm
by CSUBUCDAD
slycat wrote:No they dropped the phrase "war on terror". This is a good thing. Bush used to to rally fear about Iraq and start a war there. The only "war on terror " we have is the one in Afghanistan and I'm thinking like the war on drugs it is a war that can not be possibly won.
You thing Afghanistan is the only country that terrorist operate in? Where the hell have you been for the last 8 years? We have troops and operatives in over 120 countries right now hunting down these bastards. Most of it you never hear about. War is war, no matter who you are fighting and on how many fronts. Left is just to passive to acknowledge it.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:39 pm
by Wedgebuster
Could the change in terminology possibly symbolize de facto and wholesale operational rerouting to the objectives?

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:45 pm
by hank scorpio
CSUBUCDAD wrote:
slycat wrote:No they dropped the phrase "war on terror". This is a good thing. Bush used to to rally fear about Iraq and start a war there. The only "war on terror " we have is the one in Afghanistan and I'm thinking like the war on drugs it is a war that can not be possibly won.
You thing Afghanistan is the only country that terrorist operate in? Where the hell have you been for the last 8 years? We have troops and operatives in over 120 countries right now hunting down these bastards. Most of it you never hear about. War is war, no matter who you are fighting and on how many fronts. Left is just to passive to acknowledge it.
Nope

Image

Image

Image

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:48 pm
by Cleets Part 2
one of the former Generals that became a war analyst for one of the media colossus conglomerations said in like 2005 of the War on Terror:
A blind monkey firing a machine gun in the dark best describes Bush's "War on Terror"

Now that's some funny shit...!!!





:lol:

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:49 pm
by slycat
CSUBUCDAD wrote:
slycat wrote:No they dropped the phrase "war on terror". This is a good thing. Bush used to to rally fear about Iraq and start a war there. The only "war on terror " we have is the one in Afghanistan and I'm thinking like the war on drugs it is a war that can not be possibly won.
You thing Afghanistan is the only country that terrorist operate in? Where the hell have you been for the last 8 years? We have troops and operatives in over 120 countries right now hunting down these bastards. Most of it you never hear about. War is war, no matter who you are fighting and on how many fronts. Left is just to passive to acknowledge it.
Okay okay my statement was misleading. I meant Al Qaeda wasn't in Iraq when we first attacked as we were lead to believe. There are terrorists all over, very true and small SEAL type operations hunting them down.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:51 pm
by Cleets Part 2
slycat wrote:
CSUBUCDAD wrote: You thing Afghanistan is the only country that terrorist operate in? Where the hell have you been for the last 8 years? We have troops and operatives in over 120 countries right now hunting down these bastards. Most of it you never hear about. War is war, no matter who you are fighting and on how many fronts. Left is just to passive to acknowledge it.
Okay okay my statement was misleading. I meant Al Qaeda wasn't in Iraq when we first attacked as we were lead to believe. There are terrorists all over, very true and small SEAL type operations hunting them down.
Yup..
since like: 1959

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:53 pm
by Wedgebuster
Cleets Part 2 wrote:one of the former Generals that became a war analyst for one of the media colossus conglomerations said in like 2005 of the War on Terror:
A blind monkey firing a machine gun in the dark best describes Bush's "War on Terror"

Now that's some funny shit...!!!





:lol:
Especially the "monkey" part!! :lol: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Image

:butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt: :butt:

:mrgreen:

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:56 pm
by UNI88
Cleets Part 2 wrote:one of the former Generals that became a war analyst for one of the media colossus conglomerations said in like 2005 of the War on Terror:
A blind monkey firing a machine gun in the dark best describes Bush's "War on Terror"

Now that's some funny shit...!!!

:lol:
Isn't it repetitive that the monkey is blind and in the dark? :?:



:D

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:56 pm
by hank scorpio
Image

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:34 pm
by houndawg
CSUBUCDAD wrote:All along. Took less that 100 days to drop the word WAR. Pitiful. More examples of the lefts inability to call a spade a spade.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
When did Congress declare war? Sounds like you missed something besides English 101.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:37 pm
by slycat
slycat wrote:
CSUBUCDAD wrote: You thing Afghanistan is the only country that terrorist operate in? Where the hell have you been for the last 8 years? We have troops and operatives in over 120 countries right now hunting down these bastards. Most of it you never hear about. War is war, no matter who you are fighting and on how many fronts. Left is just to passive to acknowledge it.
Okay okay my statement was misleading. I meant Al Qaeda wasn't in Iraq when we first attacked as we were lead to believe. There are terrorists all over, very true and small SEAL type operations hunting them down.
And to think that our Iran-Contra fun lead us to where we are now.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:12 pm
by Cleets Part 2
UNI88 wrote:
Cleets Part 2 wrote:one of the former Generals that became a war analyst for one of the media colossus conglomerations said in like 2005 of the War on Terror:
A blind monkey firing a machine gun in the dark best describes Bush's "War on Terror"

Now that's some funny shit...!!!

:lol:
Isn't it repetitive that the monkey is blind and in the dark? :?:

:D
well first
imagine a blind monkey with a machine gun
second
imagine him firing willy nilly
third
imagine between firing spurts and no flash points... you can't see him...

BTW: You're right but it adds to the hysterical nature of the comment

:mrgreen:

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:30 pm
by travelinman67
houndawg wrote:
CSUBUCDAD wrote:All along. Took less that 100 days to drop the word WAR. Pitiful. More examples of the lefts inability to call a spade a spade.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
When did Congress declare war? Sounds like you missed something besides English 101.
CSUBUCDAD was just reiterating what the Democrats have been acknowledging for the past 5 years...that the Iraq conflict is a war...

...unless, of course, you're admitting that Barack and company don't know what the fuck they're talking about and also missed something beside English 101...

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/iraq/
Barack Obama will responsibly end the war in Iraq:
Immediately upon taking office, Obama will give his Secretary of Defense and military commanders a new mission in Iraq: successfully ending the war. The removal of our troops will be responsible and phased.
[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

...sure sounds like Iraq was a war...oh, wait...

I forgot...everyone else is wrong and houndawg is right!

Right?


Or was Obama just fallaciously throwing around the term "war" to stir up voter sentiment and win the election...

...i.e....lying.



Again.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:36 pm
by houndawg
CSUBUCDAD wrote:All along. Took less that 100 days to drop the word WAR. Pitiful. More examples of the lefts inability to call a spade a spade.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
:o Libs have denied we at war?



Is you sure?

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:52 am
by AZGrizFan
houndawg wrote:
CSUBUCDAD wrote:All along. Took less that 100 days to drop the word WAR. Pitiful. More examples of the lefts inability to call a spade a spade.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
:o Libs have denied we at war?



Is you sure?
Depends what your definition of the word "is" is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:47 am
by wildkyle
why do democrats hate war so much? they liked the miltary operations that clinton started. it is no wonder why alot of miltary is not happy with obama right now.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:50 am
by dbackjon
wildkyle wrote:why do democrats hate war so much? they liked the miltary operations that clinton started. it is no wonder why alot of miltary is not happy with obama right now.
Links? Proof?

Why should anyone NOT hate war? Are you saying you love war? You love thousands of Americans getting killed? Love tens of thousands of Americans permantly disabled?

Clinton's operations had a plan, an exit strategy, and were limited in scope. They worked.


Bush's was a big fat failure.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:00 am
by travelinman67
dbackjon wrote:...a big fat failure.
"Fat"...???

Links? Proof?

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:01 am
by dbackjon
travelinman67 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:...a big fat failure.
"Fat"...???

Links? Proof?

Still going on with no resolution.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:39 pm
by wildkyle
dbackjon wrote:
wildkyle wrote:why do democrats hate war so much? they liked the miltary operations that clinton started. it is no wonder why alot of miltary is not happy with obama right now.
Links? Proof?

Why should anyone NOT hate war? Are you saying you love war? You love thousands of Americans getting killed? Love tens of thousands of Americans permantly disabled?

Clinton's operations had a plan, an exit strategy, and were limited in scope. They worked.


Bush's was a big fat failure.
is that why were still in africa and kosvo. my brother in law is in the miltary and he said alot of the miltary and their familys are getting mad at obama.

Re: This story proves my point that libs have denied we at war

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:20 pm
by slycat
wildkyle wrote:why do democrats hate war so much? they liked the miltary operations that clinton started. it is no wonder why alot of miltary is not happy with obama right now.
I hate unnecessary war. Like the one in Iraq. I can live with the one in Afghanistan. Still wondering when we go to Darfur.